Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:31:16.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Precise Timing of Embryo Splitting for Monozygotic Dichorionic Diamniotic Twins: When Does Embryo Splitting for Monozygotic Dichorionic Diamniotic Twins Occur? Evidence for Splitting at the Morula/Blastocyst Stage From Studies of In Vitro Fertilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Koichi Kyono*
Affiliation:
Kyono ART Clinic, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
*
address for correspondence: Koichi Kyono, Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1 3F Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-0014, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

There is a long-held credo, as illustrated in Langman's Medical Embryology (11th ed., Sadler, 2010), that dichorionic diamniotic (DD) twins develop after embryo splitting in the early stages of embryonic development. However, from our clinical experiences of the examination of data from single-embryo transfers in 16 fertility clinics in Japan and from various reports, the majority of occurrences of DD twins have been found in the blastocyst stages.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

There is a long-held credo that the timing of embryo division governs the ultimate placental configuration of monozygotic twins (MZTs): within three days of fertilization, dichorionic diamniotic (DD); between four and eight days, monochorionic diamniotic (MD); and after eight days, monochorionic monoamniotic (MM; Benirschke & Kim, Reference Benirschke and Kim1973; Hall, Reference Hall, Rimoin, Connor and Pyeritz2001, Reference Hall2003; Redline, Reference Redline2003; Sadler, Reference Sadler2010). The percentage of all twin pregnancies surviving to birth is 25–30% in DD, 70–75% in MD, and 1–2% in MM twins (Hall, Reference Hall2003; Redline, Reference Redline2003). Benirschke and Kim (Reference Benirschke and Kim1973) showed a diagram correlating the timing of embryologic events in the first part of zygote development with types of placenta developing when twinning occurs. However, they never thought that a single blastocyst would split into two half-blastocysts, both with inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm components in the blastocyst stage.

Two-cell embryos have been artificially divided into two embryos which developed into DD twins in sheep, cows, and mice (Tsunoda & McLaren, Reference Tsunoda and McLaren1983; Willadesen, Reference Willadesen1979; Willadesen et al., Reference Willadesen, Lehn-Jensen, Fehilly and Newcomb1981). In humans, the blastomeres of a four-cell stage embryo are also flexible and able to develop into blastocysts with ICM and trophectoderm (Van de Velde et al., Reference Van de Velde, Cauffman, Tournaye, Devroey and Liebarers2008). However, we have never observed an embryo spontaneously splitting in half before the blastocyst stage in over 30 years of laboratory experience. I would like to show that the majority of occurrences of monozygotic DD twins have been found in the blastocyst stages, at least in vitro, according to various reports and our own data.

Clinical Experience 1

A single, warmed blastocyst (morula stage three hours earlier) was transferred on the fourth day after progesterone supplementation during the luteal phase. This resulted in DD twins — healthy female infants weighing 2,080 g and 2,005 g at gestational 33 weeks 0 days. A λ sign was recognized under ultrasonography at seven weeks gestation, and monozygosity was confirmed by DNA fingerprinting (short tandem repeat). This suggested that there was a 99.9999528% probability that these twins were monozygotic.

Blood E2 level was 208 pg/mL, blood progesterone level was 0.2 ng/mL, and endometrial thickness was 11.5 mm. No follicles of more than 10 mm in diameter were detected in either ovary when the progesterone injection was started. We confirmed no ovulation in the patient at that time and no intercourse between the couple during the treatment cycle (Doshida et al., Reference Doshida, Toya, Araki and Kyono2012).

Clinical Experience 2

We transferred a single, vitrified-warmed blastocyst, which divided into two half-blastocysts, both with trophectoderm and ICM components in spontaneously hatching zona pellucida on the fifth day after progesterone administration. Six milligrams per day of oral estradiol was administered from day 1, and 50 mg per day of progesterone was administered from day 14 (blood E2 level: 415.7 pg/mL; blood progesterone level: 0.2 ng/mL; maximum follicular diameter of both ovaries: less than 10 mm; endometrial thickness: 9.1 mm). Two gestational sacs and fetuses with heartbeats showing a λ sign under ultrasonography were recognized at seven weeks of gestation and the patient gave birth to two healthy female infants weighing 1,530 g and 1,388 g at gestational 33 weeks. The pathological examination demonstrated that the DD twin placentas had fused in the third trimester (Shibuya & Kyono, Reference Shibuya and Kyono2012).

Analysis of Data From 16 Facilities

Following these cases, we examined incidence, chorionicity, and amnionicity of MZT pregnancies after single-embryo transfer (SET) in a 16-clinic multicenter study. We asked all 25 centers of the Japanese Institute for Standardizing Assisted Reproductive Technology (JISART) for their cooperation in a study of DD twins following a SET. Sixteen of these centers agreed to support us.

Ultrasonography to examine chorionicity and amnionicity for MZT pregnancy was performed at 7–9 weeks gestation, which is the standard timing in Japan as we refer patients to hospitals for prenatal care at 8–10 weeks.

A total of 15,355 In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles resulting in pregnancy following SET (52,135 cycles) from January 2006 through December 2010 at 16 centers in Japan were reviewed retrospectively. The study was approved by a local institutional review board. Two hundred and seven MZTs (1.4%) were diagnosed after first-trimester ultrasound evaluation. The criteria for determining DD twins were the presence of the twin peak (λ) sign; 27.0% (56/207) of MZTs were DD, 65.2% (135/207) MD, 4.8% (10/207) MM, and 2.9% (6/207) other (see Figure 1 of Kyono et al., Reference Kyono, Shiotani, Watanabe, Oka, Takahashi and Hayashi2011). These percentages are reasonably consistent with data of natural conceptions (DD: 25–30%; MD: 70–75%; and MM: 1–2%; Hall, Reference Hall, Rimoin, Connor and Pyeritz2001). The numbers of deliveries, ongoing pregnancies, and miscarriages were 37 (66.1%), 9 (16.1%), and 10 (17.9%) in DD; 97 (71.9%), 13 (9.6%), and 25 (18.5%) in MD; 4 (40%), 1 (10%), and 5 (50%) in MM; and 4 (66.7%), 0 (0%), and 2 (33.3%) in others, respectively. In 37 DD twin births, both babies were born alive in 20 cases. In the remaining 17 cases of DD twins, only one baby was born alive. This was due to vanishing (16) and reduction (1) in the first trimester. In 18/20 DD twin cases with both babies born alive, morula to blastocyst stage embryos on days 4–6 had been transferred. Three of these were different-gender twins, thus actually dizygotic. Around 6/18 cases might have occurred due to the combination of a transferred blastocyst and a natural pregnancy, because three cases were different-sex babies, and it is reasonable to assume that the same situation occurred in an equal number of same-sex DD twins. However, these data indicate that at least in the remaining 12 cases, the embryo splitting took place after day 4 (Figure 1; Kyono, Reference Kyono2012). Although there was DNA analysis in only one case in this multicenter study, the fact that every case was a SET and the λ sign was observed in each case strongly suggests that 12 cases were DD twins. Cases of monozygotic DD twins might be related to extended culture (Kyono et al., Reference Kyono, Shiotani, Watanabe, Oka, Takahashi and Hayashi2011).

FIGURE 1 Eighteen cases of two DD twin babies born alive from D4-5 transfer (Kyono, Reference Kyono2012).

This examination suggests that the splitting of the transferred embryos took place during or after the blastocyst stage, and that the popular credo stating that the timing of embryo division governs the placental configuration of MZTs must be re-examined as to its veracity, at least in vitro and also possibly in vivo.

Discussion

Although the majority of ART-related multiple pregnancies are thought to be dizygotic (derived from two or more fertilized eggs), numerous reports suggest an increase in MZT pregnancies (Alikani et al., Reference Alikani, Cekleniak, Walters and Cohen2003; Aston et al., Reference Aston, Peterson and Carrell2008; Blickenstein et al., Reference Blickenstein, Verhoeven and Keith1999; Derom et al., Reference Derom, Vlietinck, Derom, Van Den Berghe and Thiery1987; Edwards et al., Reference Edwards, Mettler and Walters1986; Sills et al., Reference Sills, Moomjy, Naninovic, Veeck, McGee, Palermo and Rosenwaks2000). Currently, approximately 1.5–2% of all clinical pregnancies that occur after ovulation induction using exogenous gonadotropin therapy (with or without IVF and embryo transfer) are reported as MZT pregnancies, and the incidence of those is four times higher than that of spontaneously conceived MZT pregnancies which eventuated in live births (Alikani et al., Reference Alikani, Cekleniak, Walters and Cohen2003; Derom et al., Reference Derom, Vlietinck, Derom, Van Den Berghe and Thiery1987; Edwards et al., Reference Edwards, Mettler and Walters1986; Schachter et al., Reference Schachter, Raziel, Friedler, Strassburger, Bern and Ron-El2001; Wenstrom et al., Reference Wenstrom, Syrop, Hammitt and Van Voorhis1993).

Some authors have identified ovarian hyperstimulation (Derom et al., Reference Derom, Vlietinck, Derom, Van Den Berghe and Thiery1987, Reference Derom, Leroy, Vlietinck, Fryns and Derom2006; Schachter et al., Reference Schachter, Raziel, Friedler, Strassburger, Bern and Ron-El2001; Sills et al., Reference Sills, Moomjy, Naninovic, Veeck, McGee, Palermo and Rosenwaks2000), assisted hatching (Abusheikha et al., Reference Abusheikha, Salha, Sharma and Brinsden2000; Alikani et al., Reference Alikani, Noyes, Cohen and Rosenwaks1994; Hershlag et al., Reference Hershlag, Paine, Cooper, Scholl, Rawlinson and Kvapil1999; Saito et al., Reference Saito, Tsutsumi, Noda, Ibuki and Hiroi2000; Schieve et al., Reference Schieve, Meikle, Peterson, Jeng, Burnett and Wilcox2000; Skiadas et al., Reference Skiadas, Missmer, Benson, Gee and Racowsky2008; Slotnik & Ortega, Reference Slotnik and Ortega1996; Tarlatzis et al., Reference Tarlatzis, Qublan, Sanopoulou, Zepiridis, Brimbizis and Bontis2002), and/or extended culture (Behr et al., Reference Behr, Fisch, Racowsky, Miller, Pool and Milki2000; Da Costa et al., Reference Da Costa, Abdelmassih, De Oliveira, Abdelmassih, Abdelmassih and Nagy2001; Jain et al., Reference Jain, Boostanfar, Slater, Francis and Paulson2004; Kyono et al., Reference Kyono, Shiotani, Watanabe, Oka, Takahashi and Hayashi2011; Milki et al., Reference Milki, Jun, Behr, Giudice and Westphal2003; Rijinders et al., Reference Rijinders, van Os and Hansen1998; Sheiner et al., Reference Sheiner, Har-Vardi and Potashnik2001; Vitthala et al., Reference Vitthala, Gelbaya, Brison, Fitzgerald and Nardo2009; Wright et al., Reference Wright, Schieve, Vahgratian and Reynold2004) as possible reasons for monozygotic twinning.

Our aim is to clarify the precise timing of embryo splitting resulting in monozygotic DD twins. First, there have been some reports which suggested that embryo splitting occurred in the blastocyst stages.

There are various reports of atypical hatching leading to twinning in the literature, in particular those of Van Langendonckt et al. (Reference Van Langendonckt, Wyns, Godin, Toussaint-Demylle and Donnez2000), Meintjes et al. (Reference Meintjes, Guerami, Rodriguez, Crider-Pirkle and Madden2001), and Behr and Milki (Reference Behr and Milki2003), but our case was the first that reported successful birth of same-sex DD twins after a single-blastocyst transfer (Doshida et al., Reference Doshida, Toya, Araki and Kyono2012). Van Langendonckt et al. (Reference Van Langendonckt, Wyns, Godin, Toussaint-Demylle and Donnez2000) reported a case of atypical hatching of a human blastocyst leading to monozygotic twinning. They showed a half-blastocyst in the zona pellucida and a half-blastocyst herniated through the zona pellucida in one blastocyst. After a two-blastocyst transfer, they confirmed one gestational sac and fetus with a fetal heartbeat, and two gestational sacs and fetuses without fetal heartbeats, and it was concluded that this was a dizygotic trichorial triamniotic triplet pregnancy. Meintjes et al. (Reference Meintjes, Guerami, Rodriguez, Crider-Pirkle and Madden2001) reported a trichorionic heterozygotic triplet pregnancy with dichorionic monozygotic twins following transfer of two expanded blastocysts, one of which had two distinct ICMs. We speculate that one blastocyst had two distinct ICMs in one trophectoderm that formed two half-blastocycts with two ICMs and two trophectoderms, which developed into monozygotic DD twins. One of the triplets was ongoing at 33 weeks at the time of the original publication.

Behr and Milki (Reference Behr and Milki2003) reported a case of atypical hatching of a human blastocyst in vitro forming two identical embryos. On day 5, they observed two trophoblast populations sharing an ICM from a single blastocyst. On the afternoon of day 5, the now completely hatched blastocysts of similar size, both of which had a visible trophectoderm and ICM, connected together. On day 6, the two blastocysts separated completely. However, the blastocysts were not cryopreserved or transferred. Tokunaga et al. (Reference Tokunaga, Shibahara, Shimada, Hirano, Suzuki, Takamizawa and Suzuki2010) reported monozygotic DD twins (two healthy girls) following a single warmed blastocyst (Grade 5BC) with assisted hatching.

Knopman et al. (Reference Knopman, Krey, Lee, Fino, Novetsky and Noyes2010) reported 98 MZTs confirmed on transvaginal ultrasonography at 7–12 weeks gestation (2% incidence). Only one DD MZT pregnancy was clearly diagnosed in their cohort. However, their diagnosis of DD gestations is limited, because DNA analysis, the gold standard for diagnosing monozygotic siblings, was not performed on the fetuses or children.

Knopman et al. (Reference Knopman, Krey, Lee, Fino, Novetsky and Noyes2010) also reported that they had not seen an embryo splitting in half spontaneously before the blastocyst stage in over 15 years of laboratory experience. In their one case of DD monozygosity, no embryo splitting was noted in a daily microscopic examination during development from zygote to blastocyst.

Second, there are our two cases in which embryo splitting occurred during blastocyst stages. In our two cases, ultrasonography showed a λ sign between two gestational sacs and fetuses with fetal heartbeats at seven weeks of gestation. The diagnosis was a single zygote with two chorions and two amnions. Carroll et al. (Reference Carroll, Soothill, Abdel-Tattah, Porter, Montague and Kyle2002) reported that the most reliable indicator for dichorionicity was a combination of the λ sign and two separate placentae with a sensitivity and specificity of 97.4% and 100%, respectively. The pathological finding was that the DD twin placentas had fused in the third trimester in the second case. DNA fingerprinting (short tandem repeat) confirmed that the two babies originated from the same zygote in the first case.

In the second reported case of DD twins from an embryo that splits in the blastocyst stage, the embryo had been chosen due to its grade being higher than that of the other cryopreserved embryos. When we found the abnormality (two half-blastocysts) in the warmed embryo, we informed the patients, who decided to proceed with the embryo transfer as they did not want to waste the embryo or wait for another embryo to warm. In our laboratory, we measure the pH of media (7.20–7.40), CO2 levels (5.5–6.5%), O2 levels (4.5–5.5%), and temperature (36.5–37.5 °C) every day, and as far as we can ascertain, there were no irregularities. We speculate that this development was neither laboratory-specific nor patient-specific.

It is interesting to note that a human blastocyst has been observed to cleave spontaneously into two complete blastocysts, both with ICM and trophectoderm components during the hatching process in vitro, a phenomenon that would also result in a DD pregnancy (Behr & Milki, Reference Behr and Milki2003; Shibuya & Kyono, Reference Shibuya and Kyono2012; Van Langendonckt et al., Reference Van Langendonckt, Wyns, Godin, Toussaint-Demylle and Donnez2000). Massip et al. (Reference Massip, Mulnard, Vanderzwalmen, Hanzen and Ectors1982) confirmed this fact in cows using cinematographic and morphometric analysis.

Monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer is typically monochorionic, resulting from the division of the ICM within a single trophectoderm (Chida, Reference Chida1990; Milki et al., Reference Milki, Hinvkley, Grumet and Chitkara2001; Mio, Reference Mio2008). When we diagnose DD twins under ultrasonography at 7–11 weeks gestation, we must discriminate between (1) monozygotic DD twins (two half-blastocysts, both with ICM and trophectoderm components from a SET), (2) dizygotic DD twins (a SET with a natural pregnancy: Kyono et al., Reference Kyono, Nakajo, Doshida, Toya and Araki2009; Sugawara et al., Reference Sugawara, Hukuchi, Maeda, Komaba and Araki2010; Van der Hoorn et al., Reference Van der Hoorn, Helmerhorst, Claas and Scherjon2011), and (3) dizygotic DD twins (a two-embryo transfer). In MD twins, we must discriminate between (1) monozygotic MD twins (a SET) and (2) dizygotic MD twins (dual-embryo transfer: blood chimerism; Hackmon et al., Reference Hackmon, Jormark, Cheng, Green and Divon2009; Kuhl-Burmeister et al., Reference Kuhl-Burmeister, Simeoni, Weber-Matthiesen, Milde, Herwartz, Neppert and Suttorp2000; Machin, Reference Machin2009; Miura & Niikawa, Reference Miura and Niikawa2005; Souter et al., Reference Souter, Kapur, Nyholt, Skogerboe, Myerson, Ton and Glass2003; Williams et al., Reference Williams, Wallace, Drury, Kipersztok, Edwards, Williams and Zori2004). We can discriminate by histochemical analysis of placenta, chromosome analysis (blood, skin biopsy specimen, umbilical cord tissue, buccal smear), blood type, enzyme polymorphisms, and human leukocyte antigen types.

The vascular connections can also be expected to lead to the sharing of hematopoietic stem cells, microchimerism between dizygotic twins, and mosaicism if genetic discordance arises between the monozygotic twins. More fetal–maternal microchimerism takes place with complications of pregnancy, such as pre-eclampsia or bleeding, which typically has been seen in twin pregnancies. However, Jang et al. (Reference Jang, Jung, Kim, Park and Kim2010) reported a very rare case of blood chimerism in dichorionic placentas. It is very important for reproductive doctors and obstetricians to exchange information in cases of twin pregnancy.

One possible reason for the common belief that embryo splitting occurs in the two-cell stage is that it is widely known that we can produce monozygotic DD twins by splitting an embryo artificially at the two-cell stage. For example, monozygotic twins have been produced by separation of the blastomeres of two-cell embryos in sheep (Willadesen, Reference Willadesen1979), cows (Willadesen et al., Reference Willadesen, Lehn-Jensen, Fehilly and Newcomb1981), and mice (Tsunoda & McLaren, Reference Tsunoda and McLaren1983). However, natural splitting in two-cell embryos has never been observed. We have shown that, without this technique, natural splitting of embryos leading to monozygotic DD twins occurs during the blastocyst stage after day 5 post-fertilization.

Conclusion

In conclusion, previous cases, along with our own reports, suggest that the splitting of transferred embryos took place during the blastocyst stage, and the popular credo related to the timing of embryo splitting outlined above must be re-examined as to its veracity.

References

Abusheikha, N., Salha, O., Sharma, V., & Brinsden, P. (2000). Monozygotic twinning and IVF/ICSI treatment: A report of 11 cases and review of the literature. Human Reproduction Update, 6, 396403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alikani, M., Cekleniak, N. A., Walters, E., & Cohen, J. (2003). Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: An analysis of 81 consecutive cases. Human Reproduction, 18, 19371943.Google Scholar
Alikani, M., Noyes, N., Cohen, J., & Rosenwaks, Z. (1994). Monozygotic twinning in the human is associated with the zona pellucida architecture. Human Reproduction, 9, 13181321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, K. I., Peterson, C. M., & Carrell, D. T. (2008). Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: A review. Reproduction, 136, 377386.Google Scholar
Behr, B., Fisch, J. D., Racowsky, C., Miller, K., Pool, T. B., & Milki, A. A. (2000). Blastocyst-ET and monozygotic twinning. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17, 349351.Google Scholar
Behr, B., & Milki, A. (2003). Visualization of atypical hatching of a human blastocyst in vitro forming two identical embryos. Fertility and Sterility, 80, 15021503.Google Scholar
Benirschke, K., & Kim, C. K. (1973). Multiple pregnancy 1. New England Journal of Medicine, 288, 12761284.Google Scholar
Blickenstein, I., Verhoeven, H. C., & Keith, L. G. (1999). Zygotic splitting after assisted reproduction. New England Journal of Medicine, 340, 738739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. G. M., Soothill, P. W., Abdel-Tattah, S. A., Porter, H., Montague, I., & Kyle, P. M. (2002). Prediction of chorionicity in twin pregnancies at 10–14 weeks of gestation. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109, 182186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chida, S. (1990). Monozygous double inner cell masses in mouse blastocysts following fertilization in vitro and in vivo. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 7, 177179.Google Scholar
Da Costa, A. L. E., Abdelmassih, S., De Oliveira, F. G., Abdelmassih, V., Abdelmassih, R., & Nagy, Z. P. (2001). Monozygotic twins and transfer at the blastocyst stage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reproduction, 16, 333336.Google Scholar
Derom, C., Leroy, F., Vlietinck, R., Fryns, J. B., & Derom, R. (2006). High frequency of iatrogenic monozygotic twins with administration of clomiphene citrate and a change in chorionicity. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 755757.Google Scholar
Derom, C., Vlietinck, R., Derom, R., Van Den Berghe, H., & Thiery, R. (1987). Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet, 1, 12361238.Google Scholar
Doshida, M., Toya, M., Araki, Y., & Kyono, K. (2012). A review of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies by the single embryo transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 14.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. G., Mettler, L., & Walters, D. E. (1986). Identical twins and in vitro fertilization. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, 3, 114117.Google Scholar
Hackmon, R., Jormark, S., Cheng, V., Green, C. O., & Divon, M. Y. (2009). Monochorionic dizygotic twins in a spontaneous pregnancy: A rare case report. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 22, 708710.Google Scholar
Hall, J. G. (2001). Twins and twinning. In Rimoin, D. L., Connor, J. M. & Pyeritz, R. E. (Eds.), Emery and Rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 501513). New York: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Hall, J. G. (2003). Twinning. Lancet, 362, 735743.Google Scholar
Hershlag, A., Paine, T., Cooper, G. W., Scholl, G. M., Rawlinson, K., & Kvapil, G. (1999). Monozygotic twinning associated with mechanical assisted hatching. Fertility and Sterility, 71, 144146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jain, J. K., Boostanfar, R., Slater, C. C., Francis, M. M., & Paulson, R. J. (2004). Monozygotic twins and triplets in association with blastocyst transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 21, 103107.Google Scholar
Jang, J. H., Jung, H., Kim, J. H., Park, W. S., & Kim, S. H. (2010). Blood chimerism in a dizygotic dichorionic pregnancy. Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 30, 521524.Google Scholar
Knopman, J., Krey, L. C., Lee, J., Fino, M. E., Novetsky, A. P., & Noyes, N. (2010). Monozygotic twinning: An eight-year experience at a large IVF center. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 502510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl-Burmeister, R., Simeoni, E., Weber-Matthiesen, K., Milde, A., Herwartz, C., Neppert, J., & Suttorp, M. (2000). Equal distribution of congenital blood cell chimerism in dizygotic triplets after in vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 15, 12001204.Google Scholar
Kyono, K. (2012). New mechanism of twinning: A mini-review from the facts confirmed practically (Japanese). Journal of Japan Society of Assisted Reproduction, 15, 1319.Google Scholar
Kyono, K., Nakajo, Y., Doshida, M., Toya, M., & Araki, Y. (2009). A birth of twins — one boy and one girl — from a single embryo transfer and a possible natural pregnancy. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 26, 553554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyono, K., Shiotani, M., Watanabe, H., Oka, C., Takahashi, K., & Hayashi, N. (2011). When is the actual splitting time of the embryo to develop monozygotic dichorionic diamniotic (DD) twins following a single embryo transfer? Fertility and Sterility, 96 (Suppl.), S275.Google Scholar
Machin, G. (2009). Non-identical monozygotic twins, intermediate twin types, zygosity testing, and the non-random nature of monozygotic twinning: A review. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 151C, 110127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massip, A., Mulnard, J., Vanderzwalmen, P., Hanzen, C., & Ectors, F. (1982). The behavior of cow blastocyst in vitro: Cinematographic and morphometric analysis. Journal of Anatomy, 134, 399405.Google Scholar
Meintjes, M., Guerami, A. R., Rodriguez, J. A., Crider-Pirkle, S. S., & Madden, J. D. (2001). Prospective identification of an in vitro-assisted monozygotic pregnancy based on a double-inner-cell-mass blastocyst. Fertility and Sterility, 76 (Suppl. 1), S172S173.Google Scholar
Milki, A. A., Hinvkley, M. D., Grumet, F. C., & Chitkara, U. (2001). Current IVF and spontaneous conception resulting in a quadruplet pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 16, 23242326.Google Scholar
Milki, A. A., Jun, S. H., Behr, B., Giudice, L. C., & Westphal, L. M. (2003). Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 79, 503506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mio, Y. (2008). Dynamic morphological analysis of human embryonic development using timelapse cinematography. Acta Obstetrica Et Gynaecologica Japonica, 60, 389398.Google Scholar
Miura, K., & Niikawa, N. (2005). Do monochorionic dizygotic twins increase after pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology? Journal of Human Genetic, 50, 16.Google Scholar
Redline, R. W. (2003). Nonidentical twins with a single placenta — Disproving dogma in perinatal pathology. New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 111114.Google Scholar
Rijinders, P. M., van Os, H. C., & Hansen, C. A. (1998). Increased incidence of monozygotic twinning following the transfer of blastocysts in human IVF/ICSI. Fertility and Sterility, 70, S15S16.Google Scholar
Sadler, T. W. (2010). Langman's medical embryology (11th ed., pp. 106108). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Saito, H., Tsutsumi, O., Noda, Y., Ibuki, Y., & Hiroi, M. (2000). Do assisted reproductive technologies have effects on the chemotherapy of monozygotic twinning? Fertility and Sterility, 74, 178179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, M., Raziel, A., Friedler, S., Strassburger, D., Bern, O., & Ron-El, R. (2001). Monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technologies: A phenomenon independent of micromanipulation. Human Reproduction, 16, 12641269.Google Scholar
Schieve, L. A., Meikle, S. F., Peterson, H. B., Jeng, G., Burnett, N. M., & Wilcox, L.S. (2000). Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 74, 288294.Google Scholar
Sheiner, E., Har-Vardi, I., & Potashnik, G. (2001). The potential association between blastocyst transfer and monozygotic twinning. Fertility and Sterility, 75, 217218.Google Scholar
Shibuya, Y., & Kyono, K. (2012). A successful birth of healthy monozygotic dichorionic diamniotic (DD) twins of the same gender following a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 29, 255257.Google Scholar
Sills, E. S., Moomjy, M., Naninovic, N., Veeck, L., McGee, M., Palermo, G. D., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2000). Human zona pellucida micromanipulation and monozygotic twinning frequency after IVF. Human Reproduction, 15, 890895.Google Scholar
Skiadas, C., Missmer, S. A., Benson, C. B., Gee, R. E., & Racowsky, C. (2008). Risk factors associated with pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair following assisted reproductive technologies. Human Reproduction, 23, 13661371.Google Scholar
Slotnik, R. N., & Ortega, J. E. (1996). Monoamniotic twinning and zona manipulation: A survey of U.S. IVF centers correlating zona manipulation procedures and high-risk twinning frequency. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 13, 381385.Google Scholar
Souter, V. L., Kapur, R. P., Nyholt, D. R., Skogerboe, K., Myerson, D., Ton, C. C., . . . Glass, I. A. (2003). A report of dizygous monochorionic twins. New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 154158.Google Scholar
Sugawara, N., Hukuchi, H., Maeda, M., Komaba, R., & Araki, Y. (2010). Sex-discordant twins despite single embryo transfer: A report of two cases. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 9, 162172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarlatzis, B. C., Qublan, H., Sanopoulou, T., Zepiridis, L., Brimbizis, B., & Bontis, J. (2002). Increase in the monozygotic twinning rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and blastocyst stage embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility, 77, 196198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tokunaga, M., Shibahara, H., Shimada, K., Hirano, Y., Suzuki, T., Takamizawa, S., . . . Suzuki, M. (2010). Monozygotic DD twins following single blastocyst transfer. Journal of Mammalian Ova Research, 27, S60.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Y., & McLaren, A. (1983). Effect of various procedures on the viability of mouse embryos containing half the normal number of blastomeres. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 69, 315322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van de Velde, H., Cauffman, G., Tournaye, H., Devroey, P., & Liebarers, I. (2008). The four blastomeres of a 4-cell stage human embryo are able to develop individually into blastocysts with inner cell mass and trophectoderm. Human Reproduction, 23, 17421747.Google Scholar
Van der Hoorn, M. L., Helmerhorst, F., Claas, F., & Scherjon, S. (2011). Dizygotic twin pregnancy transfer of one embryo. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 805e1–805e3.Google Scholar
Van Langendonckt, A., Wyns, C., Godin, P. A., Toussaint-Demylle, D., & Donnez, J. (2000). Atypical hatching of a human blastocyst leading to monozygotic twinning: A case report. Fertility and Sterility, 74, 10471050.Google Scholar
Vitthala, S., Gelbaya, T. A., Brison, D. R., Fitzgerald, C. T., & Nardo, L. G. (2009). The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 15, 4555.Google Scholar
Wenstrom, K. D., Syrop, C. H., Hammitt, D. G., & Van Voorhis, B. J. (1993). Increased risk of monozygotic twinning associated reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 60, 510514.Google Scholar
Willadesen, S. M. (1979). A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature, 277, 298300.Google Scholar
Willadesen, S. M., Lehn-Jensen, H., Fehilly, C. B., & Newcomb, R. (1981). The production of monozygotic twins of preselected parentage by micromanipulation of non-surgically collected cow embryos. Theriogenology, 15, 2329.Google Scholar
Williams, C. A., Wallace, M. R., Drury, K. C., Kipersztok, S., Edwards, R. K., Williams, R. S., . . . Zori, R. T. (2004). Blood lymphocyte chimerism associated with IVF and monochorionic dizygous twinning. Case report. Human Reproduction, 12, 28162821.Google Scholar
Wright, V., Schieve, L. A., Vahgratian, A., & Reynold, M. A. (2004). Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF. Human Reproduction, 19, 18311836.Google Scholar
Figure 0

FIGURE 1 Eighteen cases of two DD twin babies born alive from D4-5 transfer (Kyono, 2012).