Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:59:17.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Columns
Information
The Psychiatrist , Volume 37 , Issue 7 , July 2013 , pp. 248
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013

Mental Health Act 1983: use of urgent treatment in clinical practice. The Psychiatrist 2013; 37: . The Method (p. 157) should read: ‘The study was conducted retrospectively covering a 1-year period from January 2009 to December 2009. A list of detained patients, on whom Sections 62 and 64B were applied during the study period, was obtained electronically from the IT department. A complete list of patients on whom T2 or T3 forms were filled and patients who were commenced on a CTO was also obtained electronically. Also, Section 64 and CTO11 forms were obtained from the Mental Health Act office of the trust. Respective case notes were then located and more detailed information was obtained on the circumstances of use of Section 62 and 64B/G.’

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.