Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:49:46.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Opioids, transporters and the blood–brain barrier

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2005

B. P. Sweeney
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Poole and Royal Bournemouth Hospitals, Bournemouth, UK
M. Grayling
Affiliation:
Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Conventional teaching holds that drug transport across physiological barriers such as the membrane of the gut or the blood–brain barrier is primarily determined by molecular weight, degree of ionization and lipophilicity. The blood–brain barrier is a physical and metabolic barrier whose main function is to protect the brain from a wide range of toxins and drugs, i.e. xenobiotics and metabolites. It is formed by the endothelial cells lining the brain capillaries. Complex tight junctions link adjacent cells and result in these capillaries being around 100 times less permeable to hydrophilic molecules than peripheral capillaries. Drugs such as the benzodiazepines, anaesthetic agents, nicotine and alcohol are highly lipophilic and easily penetrate the blood–brain barrier. Recently, brain penetration of a number of less lipophilic substances has been found to be largely dependent on a group of substances known as transporters. These are a diverse group of proteins which play a crucial role in drug transport and modulate drug absorption, excretion and redistribution [13].

Transporters are complex molecules that span the lipid bilayer of cell membranes. They may be of two basic types, passive, such as the glucose transporter and ion channels or active, requiring an energy source such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP). One particular class of ATP-powered transport proteins is larger and more diverse than the other classes and is referred to as the ATP-binding cassette, a superfamily of more than one hundred proteins that are found in organisms ranging from bacteria to human beings. These ATP-binding cassettes are found in numerous locations in the human body and have been found to exert a key role in a wide range of conditions including Alzheimer's disease [4], cystic fibrosis [5], stress/depression [6], gastrointestinal disease [7] and Parkinson's disease [8]. Recently, connections have been found with breast cancer [9] and the immune system [10].

The ATP-binding cassette is grouped into families designated by a letter and further subdivided into subfamilies identified by a number. Subtype B1 (also known as P-glycoprotein), which is found mainly in liver, gut and kidney, and which is encrypted by the multidrug-resistant gene-1 (MDR-1) (the mouse orthologue is designated mdr-1), was the first ATP-binding cassette transporter to be cloned and to be functionally investigated. This transporter was initially studied in the context of cancer chemotherapy because of its ability to confer multidrug resistance to cancer cells [11].

Transporters may assist either in the uptake or the excretion of drugs. P-glycoprotein is one of the main efflux transporters and is therefore responsible for the active extrusion of drugs across membranes, i.e. its main effect is to limit the net uptake from the gut or into the central nervous system. Of significance to anaesthetists is the fact that P-glycoprotein is present in the blood–brain barrier and some opiate analgesics including morphine and fentanyl are among its substrates. The implications of these are far reaching. For example, this hitherto unrecognized mechanism may underlie the inter-individual differences in response to analgesics which is well recognized by anaesthetists. Secondly, it may be possible to modulate this system by a number of commonly used medications thus altering the response to analgesics.

The ease with which opiates penetrate the central nervous system will determine their effects. For example, the opiate loperamide used in the treatment of diarrhoeal illnesses does not have any central effects. This is now recognized to be mainly due to the active extrusion of the drug from the central nervous system by the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein. If this transporter is blocked by specific inhibitors then central effects such as respiratory depression ensue [12]. This beneficial effect of P-glycoprotein is also seen with the second generation antihistamine citerizine, which unlike other sedating antihistamines is actively extruded from the central nervous system [13]. In rodents, the brain concentrations of morphine are significantly increased if a P-glycoprotein inhibitor is administered beforehand [14]. If morphine is administered to mice which are selectively bred to be deficient in P-glycoprotein (i.e. gene knockout mice) they have an increased response to the drug [15,16]. In human beings, the plasma concentration of orally administered morphine can be increased by simultaneous administration of P-glycoprotein inhibitors [17]. Similarly, the absorption of fentanyl both at the blood–brain barrier and from the gut has been shown to be dependent on a tranporter-mediated system. The main efflux transporter is P-glycoprotein which can be similarly modulated with blockers [18]. Although not widely used by anaesthetists, methadone is an opiate which is widely used in the treatment of opiate addiction. Both plasma and brain concentrations are increased up to sixfold if P-glycoprotein inhibitors are given simultaneously [19].

The implications for the anaesthetist of drug interaction at the level of P-glycoprotein are now quite clear. Fortuitous or unintentional blocking of P-glycoprotein transport may result in unexpectedly high plasma or brain levels of opiates with a concomitant improved analgesia in some, or the occurrence of side-effects in others. A wide range of commonly used medications is now known to be active inhibitors of P-glycoprotein. These include the anti-arrhythmics verapamil [20] and quinidine, antifungals such as ketoconazole, immunosuppressives such as cyclosporine [16], the antidepressives fluvoxamine and paroxetine [21], and the lipid-lowering agent simvastatin [22].

In addition to the recognition of P-glycoprotein blocking effects of certain drugs a further interesting aspect of transporter activity is their capacity to be induced in much the same way as hepatic enzymes. For example, drug-resistant epilepsy may be caused by an overexpression of P-glycoprotein induced by antiepileptic drugs [23]. Similarly, in rats P-glycoprotein activity can be increased by chronic administration of morphine, suggesting an important role for this mechanism in the development of tolerance to opiates [24]. Interestingly, there is probably co-expression of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein in the brush border of the small intestine as both proteins have similar substrates and are both modulated by similar induction agents [25]. Finally, P-glycoprotein has become the recent focus of attention of those researchers studying the human genome for clues as to the basis of the subtle but important inter-individual differences in response to medications (pharmacogenomics). For example, not only do the plasma levels of protease inhibitors in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients correlate with the P-glycoprotein genotype [26], but it is also now known that variations in the P-glycoprotein (MDR) gene in patients are related to outcome, as reflected in a corresponding CD4 cell count [27]. It is possible, therefore, that similar variations in response to opiates may be caused by variations in the gene encrypting P-glycoprotein.

In summary, therefore, the ATP-binding cassette transporter family is an important class of membrane proteins which translocate a wide variety of substrates across membranes such as the gut and blood–brain barrier. Genetic variation in these genes has implications for the disposition of a number of important drugs, including morphine and may partially explain inter-individual responses to opiates. The blood–brain barrier can no longer be considered as an inert, lipid barrier, but rather it should be considered to be a functional, dynamic interface with highly organized influx and efflux mechanisms. Knowledge of the ATP-binding cassette family continues to expand with regular characterization of new members [28]. A number of inhibitors of P-glycoprotein are frequently encountered in clinical practice and may interfere with drug transport. Deliberate pharmacological modulation of these transporters is now possible. Fuller understanding of the role of transporters at the blood–brain barrier will help clarify the nature of central nervous system complications of some drugs and be utilized to increase the brain concentration of others. The recognition of the importance of the role of transporters at the blood–brain barrier has catalysed innovative and exciting approaches to the therapy of central nervous system disorders such as drug-resistant epilepsy and has opened up revolutionary avenues of drug discovery.

References

Dean M. The human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transport superfamily. National Library of Medicine, 2002, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?call=bv.View..ShowTOC&rid=mono%5F001.TOC&depth=2
Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky S. Transport across cell membranes. In: Lodish HF et al., eds. Molecular Cell Biology, 4th edn. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2000: 578615.
Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM. Overview. ABC transporters and human disease. J Bioenerg Biomembr 2001; 33: 453458.Google Scholar
Hu M, Retz W, Baader M et al. Promoter polymorphism of the 5-HT transporter and Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett 2000; 294: 6365.Google Scholar
McIntosh I, Cutting GR. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and the etiology and pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis. FASEB J 1992; 6: 27752782.Google Scholar
Caspi A, Sugden K, Moffitt TE et al. Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 2003; 301: 386389.Google Scholar
Ho GT, Moodie FM, Satsangi J. Host bacterial interaction in the gut. Multidrug resistance-1 gene (P-glycoprotein 170): an important determinant in gastrointestinal disease?. Gut 2003; 52: 759766.Google Scholar
Lin JJ, Yueh KC, Chang DC et al. The homozygote 10-copy genotype of variable number tandem repeat dopamine transporter gene may confer protection against Parkinson's disease for male, but not to female patients. J Neurol Sci 2003; 209: 8792.Google Scholar
Liu S, Huang H, Lu X et al. Down regulation of thiamine transporter THTR2 gene expression in breast cancer and its association with resistance to apoptosis. Mol Cancer Res 2003; 1: 665673.Google Scholar
Pendse S, Sayegh MH, Frank MH. P-glycoprotein – a novel therapeutic target for immunomodulation in clinical transplantation and autoimmunity? Curr Drug Targets 2003; 4: 469476.Google Scholar
Cole SPC, Deeley RG. Multi drug resistance mediated by the ATP-binding cassette transporter protein MRP. BioEssays 1998; 20: 931940.Google Scholar
Sadeque AJ, Wandel C, Shah S et al. Increased drug delivery to the brain by P-glycoprotein inhibition. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000; 68: 231237.Google Scholar
Polli J, Baughman TM, Humphreys JE et al. P-glycoprotein influences the brain concentration of cetirizine (Zyrtec), a second generation non-sedating antihistamine. J Pharm Sci 2003; 92: 20822089.Google Scholar
Letrent SP, Polli JW, Humphreys JE et al. P-glycoprotein-mediated transport of morphine in brain capillary endothelial cells. Biochem Pharmacol 1999; 58: 951957.Google Scholar
Zong J, Pollack GM. Morphine antinociception is enhanced in mdr-1 gene-deficient mice. Pharm Res 2000; 17: 749753.Google Scholar
Thompson J, Koszidin K, Bernards CM. Opiate-induced analgesia is increased and prolonged in mice lacking P-glyco-protein. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 13921399.Google Scholar
Kharasch ED, Hoffer C, Whittington D et al. Role of P-glycoprotein in the intestinal absorption and clinical effect of morphine. Clin Pharm Ther 2003; 74: 543544.Google Scholar
Kharasch ED, Hoffer C, Altuntas TG et al. Quinidine as a probe for the role of p-glycoprotein in the intestinal absorption and clinical effect of fentanyl. J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 44: 224233.Google Scholar
Rodriguez M, Orteg I, Oengas I et al. Effect of P-glycoprotein inhibition on methadone analgesia and brain distribution in the rat. J Pharm Pharmacol 2004; 56: 367374.Google Scholar
Muller C, Bailly JD, Goubin F et al. Verapamil decreases P-glycoprotein expression in multidrug-resistant human leukemic cell lines. Int J Cancer 1994; 56: 749754.Google Scholar
Weiss J, Dorman M, Martin-Facklam M et al. Inhibition of P-glycoprotein by newer antidepressants. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 305: 197204.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt M, Lindenmaier H, Burhenne J et al. Influence of lipid lowering fibrates on P-glycoprotein in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 2004; 67: 285292.Google Scholar
Weiss J, Kerpen CJ, Lindenmaier H et al. Interaction of antiepileptic drugs with human P-glycoprotein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 307: 262267.Google Scholar
Aquilante CL, Letrent P, Pollack GM et al. Increased brain P-glycoprotein in morphine tolerant rats. Life Sci 2000; 66: 4751.Google Scholar
Watkin PB. The barrier function of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein in the small bowel. Adv Drug Deliv Res 1997; 27: 161170.Google Scholar
Savolainen J, Edwards JE, Morgan ME et al. Effects of P-glycoprotein inhibitor on brain and plasma concentrations of anti-human immunodeficiency virus drugs administered in combination in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 2002; 30: 479482.Google Scholar
Fellay J, Marzolini C, Meaden ER et al. Response to antiretroviral treatments in HIV-1 infected individuals with allelic variants of the multidrug resistance transporter 1: a pharmacogenetics study. Lancet 2002; 359: 3036.Google Scholar
Eisenblatter T, Huwel S, Galla HJ. Characterisation of the brain multidrug resistance protein (BMDP/ABCG2/BCRP) expressed at the blood brain barrier. Brain Res 2003; 971: 221231.Google Scholar