Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:50:31.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Treatment with roscovitine and butyrolactone I prior to in vitro maturation alters blastocyst production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2019

Rosiara Rosária Dias Maziero*
Affiliation:
Paranaense University, UNIPAR, Umuarama, Paraná, Brazil São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Carlos Renato de Freitas Guaitolini
Affiliation:
Paranaense University, UNIPAR, Umuarama, Paraná, Brazil São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Daniela Martins Paschoal
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
André Maciel Crespilho
Affiliation:
Santo Amaro University, UNISA, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Bianca Andriolo Monteiro
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
Jonathan Soares de Lima
Affiliation:
Paranaense University, UNIPAR, Umuarama, Paraná, Brazil
Danielle Andressa Oliveira Sestari
Affiliation:
Paranaense University, UNIPAR, Umuarama, Paraná, Brazil
Fernanda da Cruz Landim-Alvarenga
Affiliation:
São Paulo State University, UNESP, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, FMVZ, Department of Animal Reproduction and Veterinary Radiology, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Address for correspondence: Rosiara Rosária Dias Maziero. Paranaense University, Umuarama, Paraná, Brazil. Rua Leonildo Stecca, 2589, Jardim Cruzeiro, Cep: 87504-580. Tel: +55 44991681568. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

This study evaluated the effects of oocyte meiosis inhibitors roscovitine (ROS) and butyrolactone I (BL-I) on in vitro production of bovine embryos. Bovine oocytes were maintained in pre in vitro maturation (pre-IVM) with 25 µM ROS or 100 µM BL-I for 24 h to delay meiosis and for 24 h in in vitro maturation (IVM). Following this treatment, the nuclear maturation index was evaluated. All embryos degenerated following this procedure. In the second set of experiments, oocytes were maintained for 6 or 12 h in pre-IVM with the following three treatments: ROS (25 µM or 12.5 µM), BL-I (100 µM or 50 µM) or a combination of both drugs (6.25 µM ROS and 12.5 µM BL-I). Oocytes were cultivated for 18 or 12 h in IVM. When a meiosis-inducing agent was used during pre-IVM for 24 h, more degenerated oocytes were observed at the end of the IVM period. This effect decreased when the meiotic blocking period was reduced to 6 or 12 h. No significant differences were observed in the blastocyst production rate of oocytes in pre-IVM for 6 h with ROS, BL-I, or ROS + BL-I compared with that of the control group (P > 0.05). However, inhibition of oocytes for 12 h resulted in decreased embryo production compared with that in the controls (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the post-vitrification embryo re-expansion rate between the study groups, showing that the meiotic inhibition for 6 or 12 h did not alter the embryo cryopreservation process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adona, PR and Leal, CLV (2004) Meiotic inhibition with different cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in bovine oocytes and its effects on maturation and embryo development. Zygote 12, 197204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adona, PR, Pires, PRL, Quetglas, MD, Schwarz, KRL and Leal, CLV (2008) Nuclear maturation kinetics and in-vitro embryo development of cattle oocytes prematured with butyrolactone I combined or not combined with roscovitine. Anim Reprod Sci 104, 389–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barreto, LSS, Castro, VSDC, Garcia, JM and Mingoti, GZ (2011) Meiotic inhibition of bovine oocytes in medium supplemented with a serum replacer and hormones: effects on meiosis progression and developmental capacity. Zygote 19, 107–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilodeau-Goeseels, S (2006) Effects of culture media and energy sources on the inhibition of nuclear maturation in bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 66, 297306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, AT, Southgate, J, Brison, DR and Leese, HJ (1999) Analysis of apoptosis in the preimplantation bovine embryo using TUNEL. J Reprod Fert 117, 97105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carabatsos, MJ, Sellitto, C, Goodenough, DA and Albertini, DF (2000) Oocyte-granulosa cell heterologous gap junctions are required for the coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic meiotic competence. Dev Biol 226, 167–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coy, P, Romar, R, Ruiz, S, Cánovas, S, Gadea, J, Vázquez, FG and Matás, C (2005b) Birth of piglets after transferring of in vitro-produced embryos prematured with R-roscovitine. Reproduction 129, 747–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cran, DG and Esper, CR (1990) Cortical granules and the cortical reaction in mammals. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 42, 177–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuello, C, Gomis, J, Alminana, C, Maside, C, Sanchez-Osorio, J, Gil, MA, Sanchez, A, Parrilla, J, Vázquez, JM, Roca, J and Martinez, EA (2013) Effect of MEM vitamins and forskolin on embryo development and vitrification tolerance of in vitro-produced pig embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 136, 296302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downs, SM and Verhoeven, A (2003) Glutamine and the maintenance of meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes: influence of culture medium, glucose, and cumulus cells. Mol Reprod Dev 66, 90–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppig, F (1991) Intercommunication between mammalian oocytes and companion somatic cells. Bioessays 13, 569–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, EM, Vireque, AA, Adona, PR, Meirelles, FV, Ferriani, RA and Navarro, PAAS (2009) Cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes: Structural and biochemical modifications and acquisition of developmental competence. Theriogenology 71, 836–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, RB and Thompson, JC (2007) Oocyte maturation: emerging concepts and technologies to improve developmental potential in vitro . Theriogenology 67, 615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, S, Minami, N, Takaura, R and Imai, H (2002) Bovine immature oocytes acquire developmental competence during meiotic arrest in vitro . Biol Reprod 66, 1696–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyttel, P, Fair, T, Callesen, H and Greve, T (1997) Oocyte growth, capacitation and final maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 47, 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, K, Kobayashi, S, Kaneyama, K, Kojima, T and Nagai, T (2002) Effects of butyrolactone I on GVBD in bovine oocytes and subsequent maturation, fertilization and development in vitro . J Reprod Dev 48, 249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotsuji, F, Kubo, M and Tominaga, T (1994) Effect of interactions between granulosa and thecal cells on meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes. J Reprod Fert 100, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruip, TAM, Cran, DG, Van Beneden, TH and Dieleman, SJ (1983) Structural changes in bovine oocytes during final maturation in vivo . Gamete Res 8, 2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubelka, M, Motlík, J, Schultz, RM and Pavlok, A (2000) Butyrolactone I reversibly inhibits meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes, without influencing chromosome condensation activity. Biol Reprod 62, 292302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagutina, I, Ponderato, N, Lazzari, G and Galli, C (2002) Kinetics of oocyte maturation and subsequent development of IVF, parthenogenetic and NT bovine embryos after meiotic inhibition with roscovitine. Cloning Stem Cells 4, 113–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonergan, P, Dinnyes, A, Fair, T, Yang, X and Boland, M (2000) Bovine oocyte and embryo development following meiotic inhibition with butyrolactone I. Mol Reprod Dev 57, 204–9.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonergan, P, Faerge, I, Hyttel, PM, Boland, M and Fair, T (2003) Ultrastructural modifications in bovine oocytes maintained in meiotic arrest in vitro using roscovitine or butyrolactone. Mol Reprod Dev 64, 369–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, CR 2008. Eclosão assistida a laser em embriões bovinos produzidos in vitro para melhorar os índices de prenhez. Acta Sci Vet 36, 311–8.Google Scholar
Maziero, RRD, Guaitolini, CR, Paschoal, DM, Kievitsbosch, T, Guastali, MD, Moraes, CN and Landim-Alvarenga, FC (2016) Effect of temporary meiotic attenuation of oocytes with butyrolactone I and roscovitine in resistance to bovine embryos on vitrification. Reprod Domest Anim 51, 204–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mermillod, P, Tomanek, M, Marchal, R and Meijer, L (2000) High developmental competence of cattle oocytes maintained at the germinal vesicle stage for 24 h in culture by specific inhibition of MPF kinase activity. Mol Reprod Dev 55, 8995.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paschoal, DM, Sudano, MJ, Schwarz, KR, Maziero, RRD, Guastali, MD, Crocomo, LF and Landim-Alvarenga, FC (2017) Cell apoptosis and lipid content of in vitro-produced, vitrified bovine embryos treated with forskolin. Theriogenology 87, 108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponderato, N, Lagutina, I, Crotti, G, Turini, P, Galli, C and Lazzari, G (2001) Bovine oocytes treated prior to in vitro maturation with a combination of butyrolactone I and roscovitine at low doses maintain a normal developmental capacity. Mol Reprod Dev 60, 579–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponderato, N, Crotti, G, Turini, P, Duchi, R, Galli, C and Lazzari, G (2002) Embryonic and foetal development of bovine oocytes treated with a combination of butyrolactone I and in an enriched medium prior to IVM and IVF. Mol Reprod Dev 62, 513–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quetglas, MD, Adona, PR, de Bem, THC, Pires, PRL and Leal, CLV (2011) Effect of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibition on expression, localization and activity of maturation promoting factor (MPF) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) in bovine oocytes. Reprod Domest Anim 45, 1074–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razza, EM, Sudano, MJ, Fontes, PK, Franchi, FF, Belaz, KRA, Santos, PH, Castilho, ACS, Rocha, DFO, Eberlin, MN, Machado, MF and Nogueira, MFG (2018) Treatment with cyclin adenosine monophosphate modulators prior to in vitro maturation alters the lipid composition and transcript profile of bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes and blastocysts. Reprod Fert Dev 30, 1314–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizos, D, Ward, F, Duffy, P, Boland, M and Lonergan, P (2002) Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization or early embryo development in vitro versus in vivo: Implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol Reprod Dev 61, 234–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirard, MA and First, NL (1988) In vitro inhibition of oocyte nuclear maturation in the bovine. Biol Reprod 39, 229–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirard, MA, Parrish, JJ, Ware, CB, Leibfried-Rutledge, ML and First, NL (1988) The culture of bovine oocytes to obtain developmentally competent embryos. Biol Reprod 39, 546–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sudano, MJ, Paschoal, DM, Rascado, TS, Magalhães, LC, Crocomo, LF, Lima-Neto, JF and Landim-Alvarenga, FC (2011) Lipid content and apoptosis of in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 5, 1211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, GM, Sun, QY, Mao, J, Lai, L, Park, KW, Prather, RS, Didion, BA and Day, BN (2002) High developmental competence of pig oocytes after meiotic inhibition with a specific M-phase promoting factor kinase inhibitor, butyrolactone I. Biol Reprod 67, 170–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed