Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:39:25.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sperm-mediated gene transfer: effect on bovine in vitro embryo production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2012

Renata Simões ,
Alessandra Corallo Nicacio ,
Mario Binelli ,
Fabiola Freitas de Paula-Lopes ,
Marcella Pecora Milazzotto ,
José Antonio Visintin  and
Mayra Elena Ortiz D'Ávila Assumpção
Renata Simões
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Federal University of ABC (UFABC); Santo André-SP; Brazil.
Alessandra Corallo Nicacio
Affiliation:
Embrapa Beef Cattle Research Center, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Mario Binelli
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Department of Animal Reproduction, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiola Freitas de Paula-Lopes
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Science of Federal University of São Paulo; Diadema-SP; Brazil.
Marcella Pecora Milazzotto
Affiliation:
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Federal University of ABC (UFABC); Santo André-SP; Brazil.
José Antonio Visintin
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Department of Animal Reproduction, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayra Elena Ortiz D'Ávila Assumpção*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87–Cidade Universitária–05508-270–São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
*
All corresponding to: Mayra Elena Ortiz D'Avila Assumpção. Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Dr. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87–Cidade Universitária–05508-270–São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Tel: +55 11 3091 7915. Fax: +55 11 3091 7412. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The technique of sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT) can be used to delivery exogenous DNA into the oocyte. However, it has low repeatability and produces inconsistent results. In order to optimize this technique, it is necessary to study the mechanism by which DNA enters the sperm cell and integrates in the sperm genome. Furthermore, studies must focus in the maintenance of sperm cell viability and function. The aim of this study was to evaluate different SMGT protocols of sperm electroporation or capacitation (CaI) aiming to maintain sperm viability in the production of bovine embryos in vitro. Frozen–thawed semen was divided in two experimental groups (electroporation or CaI) and one control group (non-treated cells). For the electroporation method, five different voltages (100, 500, 750, 1000 or 1500 V) with 25 μF capacitance were used. For CaI treatment, combinations of two CaI concentrations (250 nM or 500 nM), two incubation periods of sperm cells with CaI (1 or 5 min) and two incubation periods that mimicked time of sperm cell interaction with exogenous DNA molecules (1 or 2 h) were evaluated. According to our data, electroporation and CaI treatments do not prevent sperm penetration and oocyte fertilization and can be an alternative method to achieve satisfactory DNA delivery in SMGT protocols.

Keywords

BovineCalcium ionophoreElectroporationSMGTIVP embryo
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 2013 , pp. 325 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Camaioni, A., Russo, M.A., Odorisio, T., Gandolfi, F., Fazio, V.M. & Siracusa, G. (1992). Uptake of exogenous DNA by mammalian spermatozoa: specific localization of DNA on sperm heads. J. Reprod. Fertil. 96, 203–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canovas, S., Adan, A.G. & Gadea, J. (2010). Effect of exogenous DNA on bovine sperm functionality using the sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT) technique. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77, 687–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, J.O., Sartori, R., Machado, G.M., Mourão, G.B. & Dode, M.A.N. (2010). Quality assessment of bovine cryopreserved sperm after sexing by flow cytometry and their use in in vitro embryo production. Theriogenology 74, 1521–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C., Smye, S.W., Robinson, M.P. & Evans, J.A. (2006). Membrane electroporation theories: a review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feitosa, W.B., Milazzotto, M.P., Simões, R., Rovegno, M., Nicacio, A.C., Nascimento, A.B., Gonçalves, J.S.A., Visintin, J.A. & Assumpçào, M.E.O.A. (2009). Bovine sperm cells viability during incubation with or without exogenous DNA. Zygote 17, 315–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagné, M.B., Pothierm, F. & Sirard, M.A. (1991). Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry foreign DNA in oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 29, 6–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galli, C., Crotti, G., Notari, P., Duchi, T.R. & Lazzari, G. (2003). Embryo production by ovum pick up from live donors. Theriogenology 55, 1341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humblot, P., Bourhis, D., Fritz, S., Colleau, J.J., Gonzalez, C., Joly, C.G., Malafosse, A., Heyman, Y., Amigues, Y., Tissier, M. & Ponsart, C. (2010). Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle. Vet. Med. Int. 2010, 192787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iranpour, F.G., Nasr-Esfahani, M.H., Valokerdi, M.R. & Al-Taraihi, T.M. (2000). Chromomycin A3 staining as a useful tool for evaluation of male fertility. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 17, 60–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonák, J. (2000). Sperm-mediated preparation of transgenic Xenopus laevis and transmission of transgenic DNA to the next generation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 298–300.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsov, A.V., Kuznetsova, I.V. & Schit, I.Y. (2000). DNA interaction with rabbit sperm cells and its transfer into ova in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 292–7.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landim-Alvarenga, F.C., Graham, J.K., Alvarenga, M.A. & Squires, E.L. (2004). Calcium influx into equine and bovine spermatozoa during in vitro capacitation. Anim. Reprod. 1, 96–105.Google Scholar
Lavitrano, M., Busnelli, M., Cerrito, M.G., Giovannoni, R., Manzini, S. & Vargiolu, A. (2006). Sperm-mediated gene transfer. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müller, F., Ivics, Z., Erdélvi, F., Papp, T., Váradi, L., Horváth, L. & Maclean, N. (1992). Introducting foreign genes into fish eggs with electroporation sperm as carrier. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotechnol. 1, 276–81.Google Scholar
Nishikage, S., Koyama, H., Miyata, T., Ishii, S., Hamada, H. & Shigematsu, H. (2004). In vivo electroporation enhances plasmid-based gene transfer of basic fibroblast growth factor for the treatment of ischemic limb. J. Surg. Res. 120, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrish, J.J., Susko-Parrish, J.L., Winer, M.A. & First, N.L. (1988). Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol. Reprod. 38, 1171–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, R.J.T.A., Tuli, R.K., Wallenhorst, S. & Holtz, W. (2000). The effect of heparin, caffeine and calcium ionophore A 23187 on in vitro induction of the acrosome reaction in frozen–thawed bovine and caprine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 54, 185–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, A.C.F., Wakayama, T., Kishikawa, H., Kasai, T., Okabe, M., Toyoda, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1999). Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Science 284, 1180–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rieth, A., Pothier, F. & Dirard, M.A. (2000). Electroporation of bovine spermatozoa to carry DNA containing highly repetitive sequences into oocytes and detection of homologous recombination events. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 57, 338–45.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sin, F.Y.T., Mukherjee, U.K., Mckenzie, J.C. & Sin, I.L. (1995). Electroporation of abalone sperm enhances sperm-DNA association. J. Fish Biol. 47, 20–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sin, F.Y., Walker, S.P., Symonds, J.E., Mukherjee, U.K., Khoo, J.G. & Sin, I.L. (2000). Electroporation of salmon sperm for gene transfer: efficiency, reliability, and fate of transgene. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 285–8.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G. & Rowson, L.E. (1972). Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30, 493–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, H.J. (2000). Electroporated sperm mediation of a gene transfer system for finfish and shellfish. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 281–4.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamada, C., Caetano, H.V., Simões, R., Nicacio, A.C., Feitosa, W.B., Assumpção, M.E.O.A. & Visintin, J.A. (2007). Immature bovine oocyte cryopreservation: comparison of different associations with ethylene glycol, glycerol and dimethylsulfoxide. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 99, 384–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed