Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:19:50.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ectopic autologous transplantation of ovarian tissue as a feasible technique to assess ovarian morphophysiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2021

Bárbara Rodrigues Nascimento
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Reprodução e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei. Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 – Dom Bosco, São João del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil
Guilherme Antonio de Gouvêa Lopes
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Reprodução e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei. Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 – Dom Bosco, São João del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil
Danielle Storino de Freitas
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Reprodução e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei. Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 – Dom Bosco, São João del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil
Paulo Henrique Almeida Campos-Junior*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Pesquisa em Reprodução e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei. Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 – Dom Bosco, São João del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Paulo Henrique Almeida Campos-Junior. Universidade Federal de São João del Rei. Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 – Dom Bosco, São João del Rei, MG, 36301-160, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

The cryopreservation of murine ovarian tissue and its transplantation can be a promising technique for the preservation of fertility and an alternative for the future reconstitution of scientific valuable strains of mice. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to describe the entire surgical procedure for ovariectomy and dorsal subcutaneous autotransplantation in mice, and also some data about the efficiency of this procedure. Female C57Bl/6J mice (n = 18) were anaesthetised and bilaterally ovariectomized. After surgery, ovaries were autotransplanted in small subcutaneous pouches in the dorsal region of the forelimbs. The animals were inspected daily and, 23 days after transplantation, euthanasia and recovery of ovarian tissues were performed. Postoperative recovery, oestrous cyclicity, and folliculogenesis progression were evaluated. At 23 days after transplantation, the recovery of the ovaries was feasible, all classes (primordial to antral) of follicles were observed. Additionally, satisfactory efficiency rates were obtained, with 100% of anaesthesia survival rate, survival, graft recovery, folliculogenesis progression and oestrous cyclicity. In general, this short article describes ovarian ectopic autologous transplantation as an effective technique for maintaining rodent oogenesis and endocrine ovarian function. Even more broadly, we can still assume that the application of this technique may reduce the number of breeding matrices and experimental animals in the near future.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byers, SL, Wiles, MV, Dunn, SL and Taft, RA (2012) Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PLoS One 7, e35538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos-Junior, PH, Alves, TJ, Dias, MT, Assunçao, CM, Munk, M, Mattos, MS, Kraemer, LR, Almeida, BG, Russo, RC, Barcelos, L, Camargo, LS and Viana, JH (2016). Ovarian grafts 10 days after xenotransplantation: folliculogenesis and recovery of viable oocytes. PLoS One 11, e0158109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, H and Lin, W (2019). A systematic study on reproductive endocrine function recovery from subcutaneous ovarian autotransplantation in mice after 2 weeks. Transplant Proc 51, 2099–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champlin, AK, Dorr, DL and Gates, AH (1973). Determining the stage of the estrous cycle in the mouse by the appearance of the vagina. Biol Reprod 8, 491–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero, L, Fazzotta, S, Palumbo, VD, Cassata, G and Lo Monte, AI (2018). Anaesthesia protocols in laboratory animals used for scientific purposes. Acta Biomed 89, 337–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Donfack, N, Alves, K, Araújo, V, Cordova, A, Figueiredo, J, Smitz, J, and Rodrigues, A (2017). Expectations and limitations of ovarian tissue transplantation. Zygote 25, 391403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart-Johnson, S and Mankelow, K (2021). Archiving genetically altered animals: a review of cryopreservation and recovery methods for genome edited animals. Lab Anim 13, 236772211007306.Google Scholar
Lotz, L, Maktabi, A, Hoffmann, I, Findeklee, S, Beckmann, MW and Dittrich, R (2016). Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and retransplantation—what do patients think about it? Reprod Biomed Online 32, 394400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, LAAC, Nascimento, BR, Jorge, EC, Segatelli, TM, Coutinho, LL, Viana, JHM and Campos-Junior, PHA (2020). Vitrification leads to transcriptomic modifications of mice ovaries that do not affect folliculogenesis progression. Reprod Biol 20, 264–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, VR, Mendes, E, Casaro, M, Antiorio, ATFB, Oliveira, FA and Ferreira, CM (2019). Description of ovariectomy protocol in mice. Methods Mol Biol 1916, 303–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugishita, Y, Okamoto, N, Uekawa, A, Yamochi, T, Nakajima, M, Namba, C, Igarashi, S, Sato, T, Ohta, S, Takenoshita, M, Hashimoto, S, Tozawa, A, Morimoto, Y and Suzuki, N (2018). Oocyte retrieval after heterotopic transplantation of ovarian tissue cryopreserved by closed vitrification protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 2037–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terren, C, Fransolet, M, Ancion, M, Nisolle, M and Munaut, C (2019). Slow freezing versus vitrification of mouse ovaries: from ex vivo analyses to successful pregnancies after auto-transplantation. Sci Rep 9, 19668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterhouse, T, Cox, SL, Snow, M, Jenkin, G and Shaw, J (2004). Offspring produced from heterotopic ovarian allografts in male and female recipient mice. Reproduction 127, 689–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, F, Meng, X, Lu, S, Hyde, LA, Kennedy, ME, Houghton, AK, Evelhoch, JL and Hines, CDG (2020). fMRI study of olfactory processing in mice under three anesthesia protocols: insight into the effect of ketamine on olfactory processing. Neuroimage 213, 116725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed