Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:04:47.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Music Archaeology: Some Methodological and Theoretical Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Extract

In its broadest sense, music archaeology is the study of the phenomenon of past musical behaviours and sound. This cross-disciplinary discipline comprises a series of approaches, including archaeological and musicological perspectives. The basis of research is music-related material finds, such as excavated and otherwise conserved sound artefacts (or ancient tools for sound and music production), as well as depictions of instrumentalists, singers, and dancers showing musical instruments and performance postures, sometimes including views of the original settings. As various archaeological cultures left such finds, many of the sociocultural contexts and meanings of past music can be studied. Today it is widely accepted that finds and depictions of ancient musical instruments are not only markers of musical traditions in space and time—especially when the archaeological contexts are well documented—but also a valuable means for experimentally testing ancient playing techniques. In the case of original sound artefacts (or their replicas), their acoustic function and the basic acoustic characteristics of a once performed music can also be reproduced and analysed. Additionally, acoustic spaces, such as architectural structures, caves, and other natural places, are the subject of music archaeological studies. The information obtained from the archaeological record can be deepened considerably when ancient scripts, historical treaties, and other written sources concerning music are related. Such documents offer notes on performance practices and their sociocultural contexts. For some cultures, hints concerning ancient music theory and musical aesthetics may also be found and, if ancient notations are related, even clues to aspects of musical structures are provided. Finally, the study of contemporary music cultures in which past musical traditions are preserved is valuable for comparative studies. In this paper the virtues of studying these sources are defined, but the limits of music archaeological research are also considered.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ascher, Robert 1961Experimental Archaeology.” American Anthropologist 63:793816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962Archaeology as Anthropology.” American Antiquity 28/2:217–25.Google Scholar
Blacking, John 1973 How Musical Is Man? Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Blacking, John 1976 “Dance, Conceptual Thought and Production in the Archaeological Record.” In Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, ed. G. G. Sieveking, I. H. Longworth, and K. E. Wilson, 313. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Blacking, John 1988Ethnomusicology and Prehistoric Music Making.” In Hickmann and Hughes 1988:329–35.Google Scholar
Both, Arnd Adje 2005Aerófonos Mexicas de las Ofrendas del Recinto Sagrado de Tenochtitlán.” PhD thesis, Lateinamerika-Institut, Freie Universität Berlin. http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000002638.Google Scholar
Blacking, John 2007Aztec Music Culture.” In “Music Archaeology: Mesoamerica,” ed. Arnd Adje Both and Julia L. J. Sanchez, special issue, The World of Music 49/2:91104.Google Scholar
Both, Arnd Adje, Eichmann, Ricardo, Hickmann, Ellen, and Koch, Lars-Christian 2008 Ed. Challenges and Objectives in Music Archaeology: Papers from the 5th Symposium of the International Study Group on Music Archaeology at the Ethnological Museum, State Museum Berlin, 19–23 September, 2006. Studien zur Musikarchäologie, 6. Orient-Archäologie, 22. Rahden, Westfalen: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Buckley, Ann 1994Music and Humanisation as Long-Term Process.” In Otte 1994:275–86. Buckley, Ann 1998 “Music Archaeology: Its Contribution to ‘Cultural’ Musicology and ‘Historical’ Ethnomusicology.” In Studies in Socio-Musical Sciences, ed. Joachim Braun and Uri Sharvit, 109–16. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Kwang-Chih 1967Major Aspects of the Interrelationship of Archaeology and Ethnology.” Current Anthropology 8:227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Ellen 1983 Aims, Problems and Terminology: Current Research in European Archaeomusicology. Ed. Graeme Lawson. Cambridge Music-Archaeological Reports, 6. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hickmann, Ellen, and Eichmann, Ricardo 2004 Ed. Music Archaeological Sources: Papers from the 3rd Symposium of the International Study Group on Music Archaeology at Monastery Michaelstein, 9–16 June 2002. Studien zur Musikarchäologie, 4. Orient-Archäologie, 15. Rahden, Westfalen: Verlag Marie Leidorf.Google Scholar
Hickmann, Ellen, and Hughes, David W. 1988 Ed. The Archaeology of Early Music Cultures: 3rd International Meeting of the ICTM Study Group on Music Archaeology. Bonn: Verlag für Systematische Musikwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1982 The Present Past. London: B. T. Batsford.Google Scholar
Kurath, Gertrude Prokosch, and Marti, Samuel 1964 Dances of Anáhuac: The Choreography of Precortesian Dances. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, 38. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
Lawson, Graeme 2004Music, Intentionality and Tradition: Identifying Purpose and Continuity of Purpose in the Music-Archaeological Record.” In Hickmann and Eichmann 2004:6198.Google Scholar
Lieven, Alexandra von 2004Music Archaeology—Music Philology: Sources on Ancient Egyptian Music and Their Inherent Problems.” In Hickmann and Eichmann 2004:99105.Google Scholar
Lund, Cajsa S. 1986 Ed. Second Conference of the ICTM Study Group on Music Archaeology. 2 vols. Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.Google Scholar
Lund, Cajsa S. 1988On Animal Calls in Ancient Scandinavia: Theory and Data.” In Hickmann and Hughes 1988:289303.Google Scholar
Lund, Cajsa S. 1998 “Strövtåg i den fornnordiska terrängen.” In Musik i Norden, ed. Greger Andersson, 33–50. Kungl. musikaliska akademiens skriftserie, 85. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lund, Cajsa S. 2008Prehistoric Soundscapes in Scandinavia.” In Sounds of History: Publications from Sound Environment, ed. Frans Mossberg, 1229. Lund: Sound Environment Centre at Lund University.Google Scholar
McLean, Mervyn 2007Turning Points: Has Ethnomusicology Lost Its Way?Yearbook for Traditional Music 39:132–39.Google Scholar
Megaw, J. V. S. 1968 “Problems and Non-Problems in Palaeo-Organology: A Musical Miscellany.” In Studies in Ancient Europe: Essays Presented to Stuart Piggott, ed. J. M. Coles and D. D. A. Simpson, 333–58. Leicester.Google Scholar
Mendívil, Julio 2004Flutes and Food for the Ancestors: From the Tradition of Discoveries to the Discovery of Traditions in Archaeology.” In Hickmann and Eichmann 2004:107–16.Google Scholar
Merriam, Alan P. 1960Ethnomusicology: Discussion and Definition of the Field.” Ethnomusicology 4/3:107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Alan P. 1964 The Anthropology of Music. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moberg, Carl-Axel 1986On Music Archaeology.” In Lund 1986: vol. 1, 237–39Google Scholar
Morley, Iain 2003The Evolutionary Origins and Archaeology of Music or An Investigation into the Prehistory of Human Musical Capacities and Behaviours, Using Archaeological, Anthropological, Cognitive and Behavioural Evidence.” PhD thesis, Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Cambridge University. http://www.dar.cam.ac.uk/dcrr/dcrr002.pdf.Google Scholar
Nettl, Bruno 1955Change in Folk and Primitive Music: A Survey of Methods and Studies.” Journal of the American Musicological Society 8/2: 101–9.Google Scholar
Nettl, Bruno 1958Historical Aspects of Ethnomusicology.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 60/3:518–32.Google Scholar
Nettl, Bruno 2004Some Considerations on the Relationship of Music Archaeology and Ethnomusicology: Informal Comments on Constructing the Past from the Present.” In Hickmann and Eichmann 2004:117–24.Google Scholar
Olsen, Dale A. 1988The Magic Flutes of El Dorado: A Model for Research in Music Archaeology as Applied to the Sinú of Ancient Colombia.” In Hickmann and Hughes 1988:305–28.Google Scholar
Olsen, Dale A. 1990The Ethnomusicology of Archaeology: A Model for the Musical/Cultural Study of Ancient Material Culture.” In “Issues in Organology,” ed. Eran Fraenkel and Sue Carol DeVale, Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology 8:175200.Google Scholar
Olsen, Dale A. 2002 Music of El Dorado: The Ethnomusicology of Ancient South American Cultures. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Olsen, Dale A. 2007The Complementarity and Interdisciplinarity of Archaeomusicology: An Introduction to the Field and This Volume.” In “Music Archaeology: Mesoamerica,” ed. Arnd Adje Both and Julia L. J. Sanchez, special issue, The World of Music 49/2:1115.Google Scholar
Otte, Marcel 1994 Ed. Sons originelles: Préhistoire de la musique. Liege: Université de Liège. Scarre, Chris, and Graeme LawsonGoogle Scholar
Otte, Marcel 2006 Archaeoacoustics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Schneider, Albrecht Otte, Marcel 1973 “Analogie und Rekonstruktion: Wege zur Erforschung der Ur- und Frühgeschichte der Musik.” In 400 Jahre Kurfürst-Salentin-Gymnasium Andernach 1573–1973, ed. Ferdinand Broemser, 51–63. Andernach.Google Scholar
Otte, Marcel 1986Apxaioλoγeω: Some Comments on Methods and Sources in Music Archaeology.” In Lund 1986: vol. 1, 195224.Google Scholar
Stiles, Daniel 1977Ethnoarchaeology: A Discussion of Methods and Applications.” Man (n.s.) 12/1:87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendrix, Philippe 1994Archéo-musicologie ou musico-archéologie.” In Otte 1994:710.Google Scholar