Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:48:56.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographical Indications: Can China Reconcile the Irreconcilable Intellectual Property Issue between EU and US?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2019

Shujie Feng
Shujie Feng*
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geographical indications (GIs), signs used on products that identify their geographical origin and special quality or reputation, are atypical intellectual property. The conflicts of interest between the New World and Old World and the diversity of legal regimes have obstructed the international harmonization of GI protection. Neither the Lisbon Agreement nor the TRIPS Agreement have been able to establish a widely accepted international GI registration or protection system. Though the Geneva Act has remarkably improved the treaty regime of GIs, the different approaches of the European Union and United States still seem irreconcilable. This article examines the Chinese dual GI system from a treaty perspective and explores the common functions of GIs and Trademarks, concluding that China's Trademark Law can ensure GI protection that is compliant with the TRIPS Agreement and the Geneva Act. The Chinese solution can be a reference for other countries which protect GIs with a trademark system.

Keywords

Geographical IndicationGeneva ActLisbon AgreementChinese Geographical IndicationTRIPS
Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 424 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © Shujie Feng 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is grateful to the editing assistance from Tsinghua Law School students: Kristina DaCosta, Andrew McNaught, and Fang Fang.

References

Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) (2017) ‘Announcement on Approving the Protection of National Geographical Indication Products for 70 Products Including Bupleurum’, National Intellectual Property Administration of PRC (4 January 2017) http://www.cgi.gov.cn/Home/Detail/1103/.Google Scholar
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) ‘Measures on the Protection of Foreign GI Products’, promulgated on 28 March 2016.Google Scholar
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) ‘Rule on the Protection of GI Products’, promulgated on 16 May 2005.Google Scholar
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) ‘Regulation on the Protection of Appellation of Origin Products’, adopted on 30 July 1999.Google Scholar
Blakeney, M (2012) ‘Geographical Indications and TRIPS’, University of Western Australia-Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2012-09, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2177435.Google Scholar
Blakeney, M (2017) ‘Geographical Indications and Environmental Protection’, Frontiers of Law in China 12(2): 162–174.Google Scholar
Blakeney, M and Mengistie, G (2016) ‘Geographical Indications in Africa: Opportunities, Experiences and Challenges’, European Intellectual Property Review 38(5): 290–306.Google Scholar
Calboli, I (2015) ‘Of Markets, Culture and Terror: The Unique Economic and Culture-Related Benefits of Geographical Indications of Origin’, in Gervais, DJ (ed.), International Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 433–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calissons D'Aix (2017) Trademark Opposition Decision No. 0000045753, Chinese Trademark Office (2017).Google Scholar
Changsha Intermediate People's Court, Margaux (2016) Xiang 01 Min Chu No. 1775 [2016].Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union (2005) Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark v. Commission of the European Communities, Joined cases C-465/02 and C-466/02, 25 October 2005, European Court Reports 2005 I-09115, paras. 194–196.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture Product Quality Safety Center, http://www.aqsc.agri.cn/ncpdlbz/cpcx/.Google Scholar
Diplomatic Conference (2015) Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, adopted on 20 May 2015.Google Scholar
Diplomatic Conference Regulations under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications, adopted on 20 May 2015.Google Scholar
Dong, X, Song, X, Wang, C, and Xia, J (2017) ‘How to Understand and Apply the Judicial Interpretation on Trademark Registration and Invalidation of 2016’, The People's Judicature 10: 35–43.Google Scholar
Enshi Yulu (2013) Gao Xing Zhong Zi No.1201 [2013], Beijing High People's Court.Google Scholar
European Commission (2003) Why do Geographical Indications Matter to Us? Brussels, 30 July 2003 (MEMO/03/160).Google Scholar
Feng, S (2017a) ‘On the Legal Nature, Function and Infringement of Geographical Indications’, Intellectual Property 8: 3–10.Google Scholar
Feng, S (2017b) 商标法原理与应用 (Trademark Law: Theory And Practice), Beijing: Renmin University Press, pp. 92–94.Google Scholar
Fiji Pure Mahogany (2016) Jing Xing Zhong Zi No. 1511 [2016], Beijing High People's Court.Google Scholar
Gangjee, D (2007) ‘Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts between Trade Marks and GIs’, Chicago-Kent Law Review 82(3): 1253–1291.Google Scholar
Gangjee, D (2012) Relocating the Law of Geographical Indications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervais, D (2015) ‘Irreconcilable Differences? The Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement and the Common Law’, Houston Law Review 53(2): 341–371.Google Scholar
Heath, C and Marie-Viven, D (2015) ‘Geographical Indications and the Principles of Trade mark Law – a Distinctly European Perspective’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 46(7): 819–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibele, E (2009) ‘The Nature and Function of Geographical Indications in Law’, The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 10(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Li, Q (2018) 国家知识产权局首次集中发布专利、商标、地理标志统计数据 (For the First Time, the State Intellectual Property Office Released Statistics on Patents, Trademarks, and Geographical Indications), National Intellectual Property Administration of PRC, http://www.sipo.gov.cn/zscqgz/1126122.htm.Google Scholar
Ministry of Commerce Press Office (2017) 钟山部长于欧委会贸易委员马尔姆斯特伦签署相关合作文件 (Minister Zhong Shan and the Trade Commission of the European Commission, Malmstrom, Signed Relevant Cooperation Documents), Ministry of Commerce of the PRC, http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ae/ai/201706/20170602585455.shtml.Google Scholar
Micara, A (2016) ‘The Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration: An Assessment of a Controversial Agreement Eyeglasses’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 47(6): 673–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napa Valley (2016) Jing Xing Zhong No. 2295 [2016], Beijing High People's Court.Google Scholar
National People's Congress, Agriculture Law of PRC, adopted on 2 July 1993 and revised 28 December 2002, 27 August 2009, and 28 December 2012.Google Scholar
National People's Congress, Agriculture Law of PRC Trademark Law of PRC of 23 August 1982, revised 22 February 1993, 27 October 2001, and 30 August 2013.Google Scholar
National People's Congress, Agriculture Law of PRC Anti-Unfair Competition Law of PRC of 2 September 1993, revised 4 November 2017.Google Scholar
National People's Congress, Agriculture Law of PRC Consumer Protection Law of PRC of 31 October 1993 and revised 25 October 2013.Google Scholar
National Supreme People's Court (2017) Judicial Interpretation of the Chinese Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Concerning Trademark Registration and Invalidation (Fa Shi 2017-2) of 12 December 2017.Google Scholar
NIPA, ‘China Protected Geographical Indication Products’, National Intellectual Property Administration of PRC, www.cgi.gov.cn/.Google Scholar
Passa, J (2006) Droit de la propriété industrielle, Paris : L.G.D.J, pp. 53–55.Google Scholar
Pomerol (2014) Gao Xing Zhong Zi No.1567 [2014], Beijing High People's Court.Google Scholar
Sanders, A (2015) ‘Geographical Indications of Origin: When GIs Become Commodities, All Gloves Come Off’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 46(7): 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spennemann, C and Vivas-Eugui, D (2006) ‘The Treatment of Geographical Indications in Recent WTO Discussions and in Regional and Bilateral Trade Agreements’, UNCTAD, October 2006, www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/downloads/2009/01/gis20dv2020cs20rev2020sa20dialogue-pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) (2003) ‘Rule on the Registration and Administration of Collective Trademarks and Certification Trademarks’, promulgated 7 April 2003, http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62513.htm (5 July 2003).Google Scholar
State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) ‘Rule on the Registration and Administration of Collective Trademarks and Certification Trademarks’, promulgated on 30 December 1994, http://www.law-lib.com/law/law_view.asp?id=59594 (5 July 2019).Google Scholar
State Council of PRC, ‘Regulation for the Implementation of PRC Trademark Law’, adopted 3 August 2002.Google Scholar
US Mission Geneva (2015) ‘US Statement on the Adoption of the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement’, US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, https://geneva.usmission.gov/2015/05/20/u-s-statement-on-the-adoption-of-the-geneva-act-of-the-lisbon-agreement/.Google Scholar
Wang, X (2018) ‘Absolute Protection for Geographical Indications: Protectionism or Justified Rights’, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property 8(2): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (1979) Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration, promulgated 4 November 1983 and amended 28 September 1979.Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2004) WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law And Use, 2nd edn, Geneva: WIPO Publication, 2004.Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2009) Possible Improvement of the Procedures under the Lisbon Agreement, 10 February 2009 (LI/WG/DEV/1/2 Rev).Google Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2016) Regulations under the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1 January 2016).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) (negotiated 1994, effective 1 January 1995).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2005) EC–Geographical Indications (15 March 2005) (WT/DS 174, WT/DS 290).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2008) Communication from Albania, Brazil, China, Colombia, Ecuador, the European Communities, Iceland, India, Indonesia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Liechtenstein, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Pakistan, Peru, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, 19 July 2008 (TN/C/W/52).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2005) Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Special Session, Side-by-Side Presentation of Proposals prepared by the Secretariat, 14 September 2005 (TN/IP/W/12).Google Scholar
Yangliuqing (2009), Gao Xing Zhong Zi No. 1437 [2009], Beijing High People's Court.Google Scholar