Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:51:14.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stunning methods for poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Mohan Raj  and
Angeliki Tserveni-Gousi
Mohan Raj*
Affiliation:
Division of Food Animal Science, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UKand
Angeliki Tserveni-Gousi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Aristotle University, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
All correspondence should be addressed to Dr M. Raj ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Electrical waterbath stunning is the most common method used to stun poultry under commercial conditions. The voltage supplied to a multiple bird waterbath stunner must be adequate to deliver the required minimum current to each bird. High frequency (> 300 Hz) electrical waterbath stunning needs further investigation to determine its efficiency. It should always be followed by a prompt neck cutting procedure where all the major blood vessels in the neck are severed. Irrespective of the waveform or frequency of the currents employed, constant current stunners should be installed under commercial conditions to ensure that the minimum currents are delivered to individual birds in waterbath stunners. Head only electrical stunning of poultry is being investigated in detail and there is scope for commercial development. Important features include (a) a constant current capable of delivering a preset current, (b) a bird restraining conveyor and head presentation devices enabling the stunning tongs to be accurately placed, (c) more effective electrical stunning tongs in terms of delivering necessary currents while using low voltages, and (d) induction of cardiac arrest immediately after stunning to eliminate wing flapping. Stunning/killing of poultry still in their transport containers using gas mixtures would appear to be the best future option as far as bird welfare is concerned. However, birds can also be stunned/killed on a conveyor using gas mixtures, thereby eliminating the stress associated with the shackling of live birds before electrical stunning. Under the conveyor system birds should be presented to the gas mixtures in a single layer. Within gas mixtures a minimum of 90% argon in air would appear to be the first choice. A mixture of 30% carbon dioxide and 60% argon in air is better than using a high concentration of carbon dioxide in air, and is therefore considered to be the second choice. A two stage system that involves firstly stunning broilers with a low concentration of carbon dioxide and then killing them with a high concentration of carbon dioxide can be used by those who wish to use this gas for economic reasons. The two stages should be distinctly separated so that the birds are stunned well before exposure to a high concentration of carbon dioxide in air. In comparison with carbon dioxide alone, a mixture of 30% oxygen and 40% carbon dioxide in air prolongs the induction of anaesthesia and the exposure time required to kill the birds. The addition of oxygen to carbon dioxide may therefore not have any benefit to bird welfare or the processors. Mechanical stunning of poultry using penetrating captive bolts or non-penetrating mushroom headed bolts has been developed. However, stunning with these devices results in very severe wing flapping and further research is necessary to find ways of alleviating this problem.

Keywords

Methodspoultrystunning
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 291 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilgili, S.F. (1992) Electrical stunning of birds – basic concepts and carcase quality implications: a review. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 1: 135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, F. (1994) Humane slaughter of poultry: the case against the use of electrical stunning devices. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 7: 221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda, C., Radisanljevic, Z., Peacock, W., Levine, M.S. and Buchwald, N.A. (1992) Differential modulation by dopamine of responses evoked by excitatory amino acids in human cortex. Synapse 11: 330–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, C.J., Devine, C.E., Tavener, A. and Gilbert, K.V. (1992) Contribution of amino acid transmitters to epileptiform activity and reflex suppression in electrically head stunned sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 52: 48–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, P., Hugelin, A. and Bonvallet, M. (1961) Effects of hypoxia on the reticular and cortical diffuse systems. In: Cerebral Anoxia and the Electroencephalograrm (Gastaut, H. and Meyer, J.S., Eds), Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, pp. 46–58Google Scholar
Ernsting, J. (1965) The effect of anoxia on the central nervous system. In: A Text Book of Aviation Physiology (Gillies, J.A., Ed.) Pergamon Press, London, pp. 270–289Google Scholar
FAWC (1982) Report on the welfare of poultry at the time of slaughter. Farm Animal Welfare Council, Government Buildings, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1987) Effect of electrical stunning on the electroencephalogram in chickens. British Veterinary Journal 143: 175–183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1988) Turkey slaughtering procedures: time to loss of brain responsiveness after exsanguination or cardiac arrest. Research in Veterinary Science 44: 183–185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1989) Effect of electrical stunning on somatosensory evoked potentials in chickens. British Veterinary Journal 145: 159–164Google Scholar
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1990a) Effect of stunning on spontaneous physical activity and evoked activity in the brain. British Poultry Science 31: 215–220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1990b) An evaluation of the effectiveness of hand held stunners for stunning chickens. Veterinary Record 126: 290–291Google Scholar
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1991a) Effect of a 350Hz DC stunning current on evoked responses in the chicken's brain. Research in Veterinary Science 50: 250–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1991b) Effect of electrical stunning on somatosensory evoked responses in the turkey's brain. British Veterinary Journal 147: 270–274Google Scholar
Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1992) Effect of incomplete immersion of the head in waterbath stunners on the effectiveness of electrical stunning in ducks. Research in Veterinary Science 53: 269–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N.G., Raj, A.B.M., Audsley, A.R.S. and Daly, C.C. (1990) Effects of carbon dioxide on man. In: The Use of Carbon Dioxide for the Stunning of Slaughter Pigs. Report of a Meeting of Experts held in Heeze on 26–27 January 1990.Fleischwirtschaft 1173–1174Google Scholar
Gregory, N.G., Wilkins, L.J. and Wotton, S.B. (1991) Effect of electrical stunning frequency on ventracular fibrillation, downgrading and broken bones in broilers, hens and quails. British Veterinary Journal 147: 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillebrand, S.J.W., Lambooij, E. and Veerkamp, C.H. (1996) The effects of alternative electrical and mechanical stunning methods on haemorrhaging and meat quality of bird breast and thigh muscles. Poultry Science 75: 664–671CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HMSO (1995) The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Rebwlations, 1995, No. 731. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, R.R., Stokes, J.W. and Downing, P. (1992) Anaesthesia and inert gases with special reference to xenon. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 20: 66–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, A.S. and McLelland, J. (1984) Birds. Their Structure and Function. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Kotula, A.W. and Helbacka, N.V. (1966) Blood retained by chicken carcases and cut-up parts as influenced by slaughter method. Poultry Science 45: 404–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldrum, B. (1975) Epilepsy and GABA-mediated inhibition. lnternational Review of Neurobiology 17: 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldrum, B. (1984) Amino acid neurotransmitters and new approaches to anticonvulsant drug action. Epilepsia 25(Supplement): S140–S149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mouchoniere, M., Le Pottier, G. and Fernandez, X. (1999) The effect of current frequency during waterbath stunning on the physical recovery and rate and extent of bleed out in turkeys. Poultrty Science 77: 485–489.Google Scholar
Radisavljevic, Z., Cepeda, C., Peacock, W., Buchwald, N.A. and Levine, M.S. (1994) Norepinephrine modulates excitatory amino acid-induced responses in developing human and adult rat cerebral cortex. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 12: 353–341Google Scholar
Raffin, C.N., Harrison, M., Sick, T.J. and Rosenthal, M. (1991) EEG suppression and anoxic depolarisation: influences on cerebral oxygenation during ischemia. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 11: 407–415Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M. (1996) Aversive reactions of turkeys to argon, carbon dioxide, and a mixture of carbon dioxide and argon. Veterinary Record 138: 592–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raj, A.B.M. (1999) Effects of stunning and slaughter methods on carcass and meat quality. In: Proceedings of 25th Poultry Science Symposium, Poultry Meat Science (Richardson, R.I. and Mead, G.C., Eds), CABI,Wallingford, pp. 231–254Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M. and Gregory, N.G. (1990a) Effect of rate of induction of carbon dioxide anaesthesia on cthe time of onset of unconsciousness and convulsions. Research in Veterinary Science 49: 360–363Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M. and Gregory, N.G. (1990b) Investigation into the batch stunning/killing of chickens using carbon dioxide or argon-induced hypoxia. Research in Veterinary Science 49: 363–366Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M. and Gregory, N.G. (1994) An evaluation of humane gas stunning methods for turkeys. Veterinary Record 135: 222–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, A.B.M., Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1990) Effect of carbon dioxide stunning on somatosensory evoked potentials in hens. Research in Veterinary Science 49: 355–359Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M., Gregory, N.G. and Wotton, S.B. (1991) Changes in the somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of hens during stunning in argon-induced anoxia. British Veterinary Journal 147: 322–330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, A.B.M., Wotton, S.B. and Gregory, N.G. (1992a) Changes in the somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of hens during stunning with a carbon dioxide and argon mixture. British Veterinary Journal 148: 147–156Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M., Wotton, S.B. and Whittington, P.E. (1992b) Changes in the spontaneous and evoked electrical activity in the brain of hens during stunning with 30 per cent carbon dioxide in argon with 5 per cent residual oxygen. Research in Veterinary Science 53: 126–129Google ScholarPubMed
Raj, A.B.M., Richardson, R.I., Wilkins, L.J. and Wotton, S.B. (1992b) Carcase and meat quality in ducks killed with either gas mixtures or an electric current and processed under commercial conditions. British Poultry Science 39: 404–407Google Scholar
Raj, A.B.M., Wotton, S.B., McKinstry, J.L., Hillebrand, S.J.W. and Pieterse, C. (1998a) Changes in the somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of broiler chickens during exposure to gas mixtures. British Poultry Science 39: 686–695Google Scholar
Richards, S.A. and Sykes, A.H. (1967) Physiological effects of electrical stunning and venesection in the fowl. Research in Veterinary Science 8: 361–368Google Scholar
Schutt-Abraham, I. and Wormuth, H-J. (1988) Cardiac arrest stunning in poultry. Proceedings of the 34th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology,Brisbane, Australia, Part A, pp.106–108Google Scholar
Schutt-Abraham, I., Wormuth, H-J., Fessel, J. and Knapp, J. (1983) In: Stunning of Animals for Slaughter (Eikelenboom, G., Ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 187–196Google Scholar
Sparrey, J.M., Kettlewell, P.J., Paice, M.E.R. and Whetlor, W.C. (1993) Development of a constant current water bath stunner for poultry processing. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 56: 267–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparrey, J.M., Paice, M.E.R. and Kettlewell, P.J. (1992) Model of current pathways in electrical waterbath stunners used for poultry. British Poultry Science 33: 907–916Google Scholar
Tserveni-Gousi, A.S., Raj, A.B.M. and O'Callaghan, M. (1999) An evaluation of stunning/killing methods for quails (Coturnix japonica): bird welfare and carcase quality. British Poultry Science 40: 35–39Google Scholar
Wilkins, L.J., Gregory, N.G., Wotton, S.B. and Parkman, I.D. (1998) Effectiveness of electrical stunning applied using a variety of waveform-frequency combinations and consequences for carcase quality in broiler chickens. British Ponltry Science 39: 511–518CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooley, S.A., Brothwick, F.J.W. and Gentle, M.J. (1986a) Flow routes of electric currents in domestic hens during pre-slaughter stunning. British Poulty Science 27: 403–408Google Scholar
Wooley, S.A., Brothwick, F.J.W. and Gentle, M.J. (1986b) Tissue resistivities and current pathways and their importance in pre-slaughter stunning of chickens. British Poultry Science 27: 301–306Google Scholar
Wotton, S.B. and Hewitt, L. (1997) The humane destruction of large poultry flocks. In: Proceedings of 5th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare,Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp.185–187Google Scholar
Zeller, W., Mettler, D. and Schatzmann, U. (1988) Studies into the stunning of slaughter poultry with carbon dioxide. Fleischwirtschaft 68: 1308–1312Google Scholar