Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:20:27.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of key health-related welfare issues in organic poultry production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

H.A. VAN DE WEERD ,
R. KEATINGE  and
S. RODERICK
H.A. VAN DE WEERD*
Affiliation:
ADAS UK Ltd., Gleadthorpe, Meden Vale, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG20 9PF, UK
R. KEATINGE
Affiliation:
Ray Keatinge Consulting, St Boswells, Melrose, Roxburghshire, TD6 0HG, UK
S. RODERICK
Affiliation:
Organic Studies Centre, Duchy College, Cornwall, Rosewarne, Camborne, Cornwall TR14 0AB, UK
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper reviews the existing body of scientific literature relevant to organic poultry production, in order to assess, and where possible quantify, the key issues affecting welfare. The review consists of three parts, covering health-related welfare issues in organic poultry production systems (breed suitability; nutrition; feed contribution from the range, range use and group size), health-related welfare issues for organic laying hens (feather pecking; endo-parasites and ecto-parasites), and health-related welfare issues for organic broilers (foot, hock and breast health). The evidence suggests that most health-related welfare issues are not specific to organic farms, but maintaining good health and welfare on organic farms can be challenging. There are many organic farms that do not have major problems, suggesting that husbandry (knowledge and technical skills) is crucial in managing welfare issues. There is also considerable variation in farming systems within the organic sector (ranging in farm size, housing and range quality, capacity to produce home grown feed, opportunities for pasture rotation etc.) which can be a constraint to solving welfare problems, particularly where managerial input has to be spread across a diversity of enterprises. It is recommended that efforts should be made to make existing knowledge more accessible to those involved in organic livestock production. This should include mechanisms for regular updating, and take account of the fact that data from published research may lag behind the levels of performance being achieved by the most able producers. Topics for further research were identified including subjects that have had little previous research, such as the catching and disposal of spent organic laying hens, management of parent flocks and keel bone breakages.

Keywords

organic productionhealth-related welfarelaying hensbroilers
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 649 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AARNINK, A.J.A., HOL, A.M.G. and BEURSKENS, A.G.C. (2006) Ammonia emission and nutrient load in outdoor runs of laying hens. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54(2): 223-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ABRAHAMSSON, P. and TAUSON, R. (1995) Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and birds’ location in three hybrids. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 45: 191-203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALBENTOSA, M.J. and COOPER, J.J. (2004) Effects of cage height and stocking density on the frequency of comfort behaviours performed by laying hens housed in furnished cages. Animal Welfare 13: 419-424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALLEN, J. and PERRY, G.C. (1975) Feather pecking and cannibalism in caged layer flock. British Poultry Science 16: 441-451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
APPLEBY, M.C. and HUGHES, B.O. (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 109-128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAARS, T., WAGENAAR, J.P., PADEL, S. and LOCKERETZ, W. (2004) The role of animals in farming systems: a historical perspective, in: VAARST, M., RODERICK, S., LUND, V. & LOCKERETZ, W. (Eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture (CAB International).Google Scholar
BASSLER, A., CISZUK, P. and SJELIN, K. (2000) Management of laying hens in mobile houses – a review of experiences, in: HERMANSEN, J.E., LUND, V. & THUEN, E. (Eds) Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries, Proceedings of NJF-seminar No. 303, pp.45-50 (Horsens, Denmark 1999).Google Scholar
BELLOF, E. and SCHMIDT, E. (2005) Broiler production with 100% organic feed is possible, in: HESS, J. & RAHMANN, G. (Eds) Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Organic Farming 2005, pp. 321-324 (University of Kassel, Germany, Kassel University press GmbH).Google Scholar
BERG, C. (2001) Health and welfare in organic poultry production. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Suppl 95: 37-45.Google ScholarPubMed
BERG, C. (2004) Pododermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens, in: WEEKS, C. & BUTTERWORTH, A. (Eds) Measuring and auditing broiler welfare, pp. 37-49 (CAB International).Google Scholar
BESTMAN, M. (2008) Opfok van biologische leghennen in verschillende Europese landen [The rearing of organic laying hens in several European countries], Report (in Dutch) Louis Bolk Instituut.Google Scholar
BESTMAN, M.W.P. and WAGENAAR, J.P. (2003) Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livestock Production Science 80: 133-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BESTMAN, M.W.P. and KEPPLER, C. (2005) Jong geleerd is oud gedaan. Opfok van leghennen voor alternative systemen [Rearing pullets for alternative systems]. Louis Bolk Instituut Publication number LV-55.Google Scholar
BESTMAN, M.W.P. and MAURER, V. (2006) Health and welfare in organic poultry in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Paper presented at Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark 2006.Google Scholar
BESTMAN, M.W.P. and WAGENAAR, J.P. (2006) Feather pecking in organic rearing hens. Paper presented at Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark 2006.Google Scholar
BERK, J. (2009) Can alternative types of litter improve foot pad health, performance and behaviour in broilers? 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009. Pp: 49.Google Scholar
BILCIK, B. and KEELING, L.J. (2000) Relationship between feather pecking and ground pecking in laying hens and the effect of group size. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 55-66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BLOKHUIS, H.J., FIKS VAN NIEKERK, T., BESSEI, W., ELSON, A., GUÉMENÉ, D., KJAER, J., LEVRINO, G., NICOL, C., TAUSON, R., WEEKS, C. and VAN DE WEERD, H.A. (2007) The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 63(1): 101-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRADSHAW, R.H. (1992) Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 69-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRAY, T.S. and LANCASTER, M.B. (1992) The parasitic status of land used by free-range hens. British Poultry Science 33: 1119-1120.Google Scholar
BRISTOL UNIVERSITY, (2006) Leg health and welfare in commercial broiler production. Report on Defra project AW0230 (2003-2006).Google Scholar
BROOM, D.M. and REEFMANN, N. (2005) Chicken welfare as indicated by lesions on carcases in supermarkets. British Poultry Science 46(4): 407-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRUCE, D.W., MCILROY, S.G. and GOODALL, E.A. (1990) Epidemiology of a contact dermatitis of broilers. Avian Pathology 19(3): 523-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUBIER, N.E. and BRADSHAW, R.H. (1998) Movement of flocks of laying hens in and out of the hen house in four free range system. British Poultry Science 39: 5-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUREL, C., CISZUK, P., BRÄNNÄS, E., WIKLUND, B., KIESSLING, A. and LILJEDAHL, L-E. (2000) Study of the individual feed choice in a group of hens using an automatic registration system, in: HERMANSEN, J.E., LUND, V. & THUEN, E. (Eds) Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries, Proceedings of NJF-seminar No. 303, pp. 51-58 (Horsens, Denmark 1999).Google Scholar
CASTELLINI, C., MUGNAI, C. and DAL BOSCO, A. (2002) Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Science 60: 219-225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHRISTENSEN, N.H. (1998) Alleviation of grass impaction in a flock of free-range hens. Veterinary Record 143: 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, M.S. and GAGE, S.H. (1996) Effects of domestic chickens and geese on insect pests and weeds in an agroecosystem. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 11: 39-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLARK, M.S. and GAGE, S.H. (1997) The effects of free-range domestic birds on the abundance of epigeic predators and earthworms. Applied Soil Ecology 11(1): 255-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COX, M., DE BAERE, K., VERVAET, E., ZOONS, J. and FIKS-VAN NIEKERK, T. (2009) Red mites: monitoring method and treatment. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009, pp: 12.Google Scholar
CROXALL, R.A. and ELSON, H.A. (2007) Comparative welfare of laying hens in a wide range of egg production systems as assessed by criteria in Swedish animal welfare standards. British Poultry Abstracts 3(1): 15-16.Google Scholar
DAHL, C., PERMIN, A., CHRISTENSEN, J.P., BISGAARD, M., MUHAIRWA, A.P., PETERSEN, K.M., POULSEN, J.S. and JENSEN, A.L. (2002) The effect of concurrent infections with Pasteurella multocida and Ascaridia galli on free range chickens. Veterinary Microbiology 86(4): 313-324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAWKINS, M.S., COOK, P.A., WHITTINGHAM, M.J. MANSELL, K.A., and HARPER, A.E. (2003) What makes free-range broiler chickens range? In situ measurements of habitat preference. Animal Behaviour 66(1): 151-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAWKINS, M.S., DONNELLY, C. and JONES, T.A. (2004) Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427(6972): 342-344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DE BAERE, K. COX, M., , VERVAET, E. and ZOONS, J. (2009) Effect of litter material on foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broilers. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009, pp: 52.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C. and GUÉMENÉ, D. (2009) Welfare issues in broiler breeders. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009, pp: 120-127.Google Scholar
EC SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANIMAL HEALTH, and ANIMAL WELFARE, (2000) The Welfare of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (Broilers).Google Scholar
EFSA, (2005) Welfare aspects of various systems for keeping laying hens. Scientific report EFSA-Q-2003-92. The EFSA Journal 2005: 1-23.Google Scholar
EKSTRAND, C., ALGERS, B. and SVEDBERG, J. (1997) Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 31: 167-174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ELBE, U., ROß, A., STEFFENS, G., VAN DEN WEGHE, H. and WINCKLER, C. (2005) Ökologische Legehennenhaltung in großen Herden: Spezifische Auslaufnutzung und Nährstoffeintrag [Organic layers in large flocks: use of the outdoor run and accumulation of nutrients in the soil], in: HEß, J. & RAHMANN, G. (Eds) Ende der Nische, Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, 2005, pp. 307-310 (Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel).Google Scholar
ELWINGER, K., TUFVESSON, M. and HARTMANN, C. (2002) Genotype-environment interactions in layers housed in an organic feed environment. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 66, Sonderheft II: 32.Google Scholar
FANATICO, A.C., CAVITT, L.C., PILLAI, P.B., EMMERT, J.L. and OWENS, C.M. (2005a) Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Meat quality. Poultry Science 84(11): 1785-1790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FANATICO, A.C., PILLAI, P.B., CAVITT, L.C., OWENS, C.M. and EMMERT, J.L. (2005b) Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: growth performance and carcass yield. Poultry Science 84(8): 1321-1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FARM ANIMAL WELFARE COUNCIL (FAWC), (1992) Report on the Welfare of Broiler Chickens.Google Scholar
FIDDES, M.D., LE GRESLEY, S., PARSONS D.G., EPE C. and COLES G.C., STAFFORD K.A. (2005) Prevalence of the poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) in England. Veterinary Record 157: 233-235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FULLER, R.J., NORTON, L.R., FEBER, R.E., JOHNSON, P.J., CHAMBERLAIN, D.E., JOYS, A.C., MATHEWS, F., STUART, R.C., TOWNSEND, M.C., MANLEY, W.J., WOLFE, M.S., MACDONALD, D.W. and FIRBANK, L.G. (2005) Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxa. Biological Letters doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357, Published online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FÜRMETZ, A., KEPPLER, C., KNIERIM, U., DEERBERG, F. and HEß, J. (2005) Legehennen in einem mobilen Stallsystem - Auslaufnutzung und Flächenzustand - [Laying hens in a mobile housing system - Use and condition of the free-range area], in: HEß, J. & RAHMANN, G. (Eds) Ende der Nische, Beiträge zur 8. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, pp. 313-314 (March 2005, Kassel University Press, Kassel).Google Scholar
GAULY, M., BAUER C., , PREISINGER, R. and ERHARDT, G. (2002) Genetic differences of Ascaridia galli egg output in laying hens following a single dose infection. Veterinary Parasitology 103: 99-107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GORDON, S.H. (2002) Extensive table bird production - health and parasite status monitoring. ADAS report on Defra project AW0221.Google Scholar
GORDON, S.H. (2004) Validation of the HEN biological model for organic laying hens and an assessment of nutritional issues in organic poultry production. ADAS report on Defra project OF0327.Google Scholar
GORDON, S.H. and CHARLES, D.R. (2002a) Niche and Organic Chicken Products: their technology and scientific principles. Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
GORDON, S.H. and CHARLES, D.R. (2002b) Desk study – Optimising the synergism between organic poultry production and whole farm systems, including home grown protein sources. ADAS report on Defra project OF0163.Google Scholar
GORDON, S.H., COTTRILL, B., TOMICZEK, M., VERHOEVEN, T., WEIGHTMAN, R., SAFFORD, R., NICHOLSON, F., HOLMES, S., TURNER, T. and VAN DE WEERD, H.A. (2006) Organic egg production – a desk study on sustainable and innovative methods for meeting the hen's protein requirements. ADAS report on Defra project OF0357.Google Scholar
GREEN, L.E., LEWIS, K., KIMPTON, A. and NICOL, C.J. (2000) Cross-sectional study of the prevalence of feather pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with management and disease. Veterinary Record 147: 233-238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GRIGOR, P.N., HUGHES, B.O. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1995a) Effects of regular handling and exposure to an outside area on subsequent fearfulness and dispersal in domestic hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 47-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRIGOR, P.N., HUGHES, B.O. and APPLEBY, M.C. (1995b) Social inhibition of movement in domestic hens. Animal Behaviour 49: 1381-1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUNNARSSON, S., KEELING, L.J. and SVEDBERG, J. (1999) Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. British Poultry Science 40: 12-18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GUY, J.H., KHAJAVI, M., HLALEL, M.M. and SPARAGANO, O. (2004) Red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) prevalence in laying units in Northern England. British Poultry Science (Suppl 1): S15-S16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HANCOCK, J., WELLER, R. and MCCALMAN, H. (2003) 100% Organic livestock feeds – Preparing for 2005. A report prepared for the Organic Centre Wales by Soil Association Producer Services and assisted by IGER.Google Scholar
HÄNE, M., HUBER-EICHER, B. and FRÖHLICH, E. (2000) Survey of laying hen husbandry in Switzerland. World's Poultry Science Journal 56: 21-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HASLAM, S.M. and KESTIN, S.C. (2003) Use of conjoint analysis to weight welfare assessment measures for broiler chickens in UK husbandry systems. Animal Welfare 12(4): 669-675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HASLAM, S.M., BROWN, S.N., WILKINS, L.J., KESTIN, S.C., WARRISS, P.D. and NICOL, C.J. (2006) Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or hock burn to assess aspects of housing conditions for broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 47(1): 13-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HASLAM, S.M., KNOWLES, T.G., BROWN, S.N., WILKINS, L.J., KESTIN, S.C., WARRISS, P.D. and NICOL, C.J. (2007) Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 48(3): 264-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEGELUND, L., SØRENSEN, J.T., KJÆR, J.B. and KRISTENSEN, I.S. (2005) Use of the range area in organic egg production systems: effect of climatic factors, flock size, age and artificial cover. British Poultry Science 46(1): 1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HEGELUND, L., SØRENSEN, J.T. and HERMANSEN, J.E. (2006) Welfare and productivity of laying hens in commercial organic egg production systems in Denmark. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54(2): 147-155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HIRT, H., HÖRDEGEN, P. and ZELTNER, E. (2000) Laying hen husbandry: group size and use of hen-runs, in: ADÖLFI, T., LOCKERETZ, W. & NGGLI, U. (Eds) Proceedings of the13th International IFOAM Scientific Conference, p. 363 (Basel 2000).Google Scholar
HÖGLUND, J., NORDENFORS, H. and UGGLA, A. (1995) Prevalence of the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, in different types of production systems for egg layers in Sweden. Poultry Science 74(11): 1793-1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOLE, D.G., PERKINS, A.J., WILSON, J.D., ALEXANDER, I.H., GRICE, P.V. and EVANS, A.D. (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation 122: 133-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HÖRNING, B., TREI, G. and SIMANTKE, C. (2004) Ökologische Geflügelproduktion – Struktur, Entwicklung, Probleme, politischer Handlungsbedarf [Organic poultry production in Germany: Structure, developments, problems, political need for action]. Report, Geschäftsstelle Bundesprogramm Ökologischer Landbau, Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn.Google Scholar
HORSTED, K. and HERMANSEN, J.E. (2007) Whole wheat versus mixed layer diet as supplementary feed to layers foraging a sequence of different forage crops. Animal 1(4): 575-585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HORSTED, K., HAMMERSHØJ, M. and HERMANSEN, J.E. (2006) Short-term effects on productivity and egg quality in nutrient-restricted versus nonrestricted organic layers with access to different forage crops. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A 256: 42-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBER-EICHER, B. and SEBO, F. (2001) The prevalence of feather pecking and development in commercial flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 74: 223-231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUBER-EICHER, B. (1999) A survey of layer-type pullet rearing in Switzerland. World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 83-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGHES, B.O. (1977) Selection of group size by individual laying hens. British Poultry Science 18: 9-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGHES, B.O. and DUNCAN, I.J. (1972) The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science 13: 525-547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUGHES, B.O., CARMICHAEL, N.L., WALKER, A.W. and GRIGOR, P.N. (1997) Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 215 - 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEPEMA, G., WAGENAAR, J.P. and BESTMAN, M. (2006) Parasitic worms in organic laying hens. Paper presented at Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark 2006.Google Scholar
JACOBS, J. (2007) Naturally acquired worms in layers. International Poultry Production 15(6): 20-21.Google Scholar
JONES, T., FEBER, R., HEMERY, G., COOK, P., JAMES, K., LAMBERTH, C. and DAWKINS, M. (2007) Welfare and environmental benefits of integrating commercially viable free-range broiler chickens into newly planted woodland: A UK case study. Agricultural Systems 94: 177-188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JORET, A. (2004) The producer and hen welfare, in: PERRY, G.C. (Ed.) Welfare of the laying hen, Poultry Science Symposium Series v. 27 (CAB International, Wallingford, England).Google Scholar
KEELING, L.J. (1995) Feather pecking and cannibalism in layers. Poultry International 34: 46-50.Google Scholar
KESTIN S.C., , SU, G. and SØRENSEN, P. (1999) Different commercial broiler crosses have different susceptibilities to leg weakness. Poultry Science 78: 1085-1090.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KESTIN, S.C., GORDON, S., SU, G. and SØRENSEN, P. (2001) Relationships in broiler chickens between lameness, liveweight, growth rate and age. Veterinary Record 148: 195-197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KIJLSTRA, A. and EIJCK, I.A.J.M. (2006) Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54(1): 77-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KJAER J.B., , SØRENSEN, P. and SU, G. (2001) Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71(3): 229-239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KJAER, J.B. and SØRENSEN, P. (2002) Feather pecking and cannibalism in free-range laying hens as affected by genotype, dietary level of methionine + cystine, light intensity during rearing and age at first access to the range area. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 21-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KNIERIM, U. (2006) Animal welfare aspects of outdoor runs for laying hens: a review. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 54(2): 133-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KNIERIM, U., VAN DONGEN, S., FORKMAN, B., TUYTTENS, F.A.M., SPINKA, M., CAMPO, J.L. and WEISSENGRUBER, G.E. (2007) Fluctuating asymmetry as animal welfare indicator? - A review of methodology and validity. Physiology and Behavior 92: 398-421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LAMPKIN, N. (1997) Organic Poultry Production. Final report to MAFF. Welsh Institute of Rural Studies.Google Scholar
LARSEN, M. (1999) Biological control of helminths. International Journal for Parasitology 29(1): 139-146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LINDBERG, A.C. and NICOL, C.J. (1996) Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. British Poultry Science 37: 709-721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LUBAC, S. and MIRABITO, L. (2001) Relationship between the activities of ‘Red Label’ type chickens in an outdoor run and external factors. British Poultry Science 42 (Suppl): S14.Google Scholar
LUND, V. and ALGERS, B. (2003) Research on animal health and welfare in organic farming - a literature review. Livestock Production Science 80: 55-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAURER, V., AMSLER, Z., PERLER, E. and HECKENDORN, F. (2009a) Poultry litter as a source of gastrointestinal helminth infections. Veterinary Parasitology 161(3-4): 255-260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAURER, V., PERLER, E. and HECKENDORN, F. (2009b) . In vitro efficacies of oils, silicas and plant preparations against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 48: 31-41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAURER, V., AMSLER, Z., HECKENDORN, F. and PERLER, E. (2007) Development of prevention and treatment strategies for parasites in poultry. Paper presented at 3rd QLIF Congress, Hohenheim, Germany, 2007.Google Scholar
MENKE, C., WAIBLINGER, S., STUDNITZ, M. and BESTMAN, M. (2004) Mutilations in organic animal husbandry: dilemmas involving animal welfare, humans and environmental protection, in: VAARST, M., RODERICK, S., LUND, V. & LOCKERETZ, W. (Eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture (CAB International).Google Scholar
MENZIES, F.D., GOODALL, E.A., MCCONAGHY, D.A. and ALCORN, M.J. (1998) An update on the epidemiology of contact dermatitis in commercial broilers. Avian Pathology 27(2): 174-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIRABITO, L. and LUBAC, S. (2001) Descriptive study of outdoor run occupation by ‘Red Label’ type chickens. British Poultry Science 42 (Suppl): S19.Google Scholar
MOBERLEY, R.L., WHITE, P.C.L. and HARRIS, S. (2004) Mortality due to fox predation in free-range poultry flocks in Britain. Veterinary Record 155: 48-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MORO, C.V., DE LUNA, C.J., TOD, A., GUY, J.H., SPARAGANO, O.A.E. and ZENNER, L. (2009) The poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae): a potential vector of pathogenic agents. Experimental and Applied Acarology 48: 93-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MWALUSANYA, N.A., KATULE, A.M., MUTAYOBA, S.K., MINGA, U.M., MTAMBO, M.M.A. and OLSEN, J.E. (2002) Nutrient status of crop contents of rural scavenging local chickens in Tanzania. British Poultry Science 43: 64-69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NAUTA, W., ROEP, D., VEERKAMP, R. and BAARS, T. (2003) Vision of breeding for organic agriculture. Report Louis Bolk Institute, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
NICOL, C.J., BROWN, S.N., HASLAM, S.M., HOTHERSALL, B., MELOTTI, L., RICHARDS, G.J. and SHERWIN, C.M. (2009) The welfare of laying hens in four different housing systems in the UK. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009. Pp: 12.Google Scholar
NICOL, C.J., GREGORY, N.G., KNOWLES, T.G., PARKMAN, I.D. and WILKINS, L.J. (1999) Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 137-152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIEBUHR, K., ZALUDIK, K., BAUMUNG, R., LUGMAIR, A. and TROXLER, J. (2005) Animal Science Papers and Reports vol. 23 (Suppl 1), Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding Jastrzębiec, Poland. Pp: 195-201.Google Scholar
O'BRIEN, J., ASPRAY, C. and PHILIPPS, L. (2006) Research and development into the viability of a one hundred per cent organic ration for organic table birds within a silvo-poultry system. Paper presented at Joint Organic Congress, Odense, Denmark, 2006.Google Scholar
ODÉN, K., KEELING, L.J. and ALGERS, B. (2002) Behaviour of laying hens in two types of aviary systems on 25 commercial farms in Sweden. British Poultry Science 43: 169-181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PAGAZAURTUNDUA, A. and WARRISS, P.D. (2006a) Measurement of foot pad dermatitis in broiler chickens at processing plants. Veterinary Record 158: 679-682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PAGAZAURTUNDUA, A. and WARRISS, P.D. (2006b) Levels of foot pad dermatitis in broiler chickens reared in 5 different systems. British Poultry Science 47(5): 529-532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PATTISON, M. (1989) Problems of diarrhoea and wet litter in meat poultry, in: HARESIGN, W. & COLE, D.J.A. (Eds) Recent Developments in Animal Nutrition, pp: 321-330.Google Scholar
PENNYCOTT, T.W. and STEEL, F. (2001) Parasitic worms in commercial free-range poultry flocks in England and Wales. The Veterinary Record 149: 428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PERMIN, A., BISGAARD, M., FRANDSEN, F., PEARMAN, M., KOLD, J. and NANSEN, P. (1999) Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths in different poultry production systems. British Poultry Science 40: 439-443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PRYCE, J.E., CONINGTON, J., SØRENSEN, P., KELLY, H.R.C. and RYDHMER, L. (2004) Breeding strategies for organic livestock, in: VAARST, M., RODERICK, S., LUND, V. & LOCKERETZ, W. (Eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture, pp. 257-388 (CAB International, Wallingford).Google Scholar
RAUW, W.M., KANIS, E., NOORDHUIZEN-STASSEN, E.N. and GROMMERS, F.J. (1998) Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Production Science 56: 15-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RODENBURG, T.B., VAN DER HULST-VAN ARKEL, M.C. and KWAKKEL, R.P. (2004) Organic broilers in the Netherlands, in: HOVI, M., SUNDRUM, A. & PADEL, S. (Eds) Organic livestock farming: potential and limitations of husbandry practice to secure animal health and welfare and food quality, Proceedings of 2nd SAFO Workshop, pp. 139-144 (Witzenhausen, Germany, 2004).Google Scholar
SAFO WORKING GROUP REPORT, (2004a) Animal health and welfare on the farm: Identification of common and country specific problems and potential solutions, in: HOVI, M., SUNDRUM, A. & PADEL, S. (Eds) Organic livestock farming: potential and limitations of husbandry practice to secure animal health and welfare and food quality, Proceedings of the 2nd SAFO Workshop, pp. 251-260 (Witzenhausen, Germany).Google Scholar
SAFO WORKING GROUP REPORT, (2004b) Solutions to farm level constraints in ensuring high health and welfare status, in: HOVI, M., SUNDRUM, A. & PADEL, S. (Eds) Organic livestock farming: potential and limitations of husbandry practice to secure animal health and welfare and food quality, Proceedings of the 2nd SAFO Workshop, pp. 261-266 (Witzenhausen, Germany).Google Scholar
SANDILANDS, T.G.M. and BAKER, L. (2009) The effect of raised perches on keel bone fracture in commercially-housed laying hens. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009, pp: 32.Google Scholar
SANOTRA, G.S., BERG, C. and LUND, J.D. (2003) A comparison between leg problems in Danish and Swedish broiler production. Animal Welfare 12: 677-683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. (1995) Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poultry Science Journal 51: 215-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHOLZ B., RÖNCHEN S., HAMANN H., HEWICKER-TRAUTWEIN, M., and DISTL, O. (2009) Keel bone condition in laying hens: a histological evaluation of macroscopically assessed keel bones. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-22 May 2009. Pp: 7.Google Scholar
SCHUMACHER, U. (2004) Animal welfare and health problem areas from an organic farmer's point of view. Proceedings of 2nd SAFO Workshop, Witzenhausen, Germany, 25.-27.03.2004. SAFO Sustaining Animal Health and Food Safety in Organic Farming. A European Commission funded Concerted Action Project.Google Scholar
SJV, (1998) Program för utvärdering av ny teknik enligt 7§ djurskyddsförordningen (1998:539) avseende inredda burar för värphöns. SJV, 551 82 JÖNKÖPING.Google Scholar
SOIL ASSOCIATION, (2000) The biodiversity benefits of organic farming.Google Scholar
SOMMER, F. and VASICEK, L. (2000) Haltungsbedingungen und Gesundheitsstatus von Legehennen in Freilandhaltung. [Management and state of health in free-range poultry flocks]. Wiener Tierärztliche. Monatsschrift 87: 202-212.Google Scholar
SONAIYA, E.B. (2004) Assessment of nutrient resources in free-range and scavenging systems. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 523-535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SØRENSEN, P. and KJÆR, J.B. (2000) Non-commercial hen breed tested in organic system, in: HERMANSEN, J.E., LUND, V. & THUEN, E. (Eds) Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries, Proceedings of NJF-seminar No. 303, pp. 59-63 (Horsens, Denmark).Google Scholar
SØRENSEN, P. (2001) Breeding strategies in poultry for genetic adaptation to the organic environment, in: HOVI, M. & BAARS, T. (Eds) Breeding and feeding for animal health and welfare in organic livestock systems, Proceedings of the Fourth NAHWOA Workshop, pp. 51-62 (Wageningen, Netherlands 2001).Google Scholar
SØRENSEN, P., DANELL, B., BRENØE, U. and TUISKULA-HAAVISTO, M. (2004) A review of poultry breeding stock in the Nordic countries. Nordisk Genbank Husdyr.Google Scholar
SPARAGANO, O.A.E., PAVLIĆEVIĆ, A., MURANO, T., CAMARDA, A., SAHIBI, H., KILPINEN, O., MUL, M., ·VAN EMOUS, R., LE BOUQUIN, S., HOEL, K. and CAFIERO, M.A. (2009) Prevalence and key figures for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae infections in poultry farm systems. Experimental and Applied Acarology 48: 3-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SPARKS, N.H.C., CONROY, M.A. and SANDILANDS, V. (2008) Socio-economic drivers for UK organic pullet rearers and the implications for poultry health. British Poultry Science 49: 525-532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
STOLZE, M., PIORR, A., HÄRING, A. and DABBERT, S. (2000) The Environmental Impacts of Organic Farming in Europe. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy Volume 6.Google Scholar
SUNDRUM, A. (2001) Organic livestock farming A critical review. Livestock Production Science 67: 207-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SUNDRUM, A., SCHNEIDER, K. and RICHTER, U. (2005) Possibilities and limitations of protein supply in organic poultry and pig production. Final Project Report EEC 2092/91 (Organic) Revision no. D 4.1 (Part 1), Department of Animal Nutrition and Animal Health, University of Kassel, Witzenhausen.Google Scholar
TAUSON, R. (2005) Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 479-492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAUSON, R. ELWINGER, K., , HOLM, K-E. and WALL, H. (2006) Workpackage 3 report ‘Health’ (deliverables D.3.2-D.3.3) Part of project: Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens (‘LayWel’) Contract No. SSPE-CT-2004-502315 European Commission, 6th Framework Programme.Google Scholar
THAMSBORG, S.M., ROEPSTORFF, A. and LARSEN, M. (1999) Integrated and biological control of parasites in organic and conventional production systems. Veterinary Parasitology 84: 169-186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
THAMSBORG, S.M. and ROEPSTORFF, A. (2003) Parasite problems in organic livestock and options for control. Journal of Parasitology 89 (Suppl.): 277-284.Google Scholar
THAMSBORG, S.M., RODERICK, S. and SUNDRUM, A. (2004) Animal health and diseases in organic farming: an overview, in: VAARST, M., RODERICK, S., LUND, V. & LOCKERETZ, W. (Eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture (CAB International).Google Scholar
TUYTTENS, F., HEYNDRICKX, M., DE BOECK, M., MOREELS, A., VAN NUFFEL, A., VAN POUCKE, E., VAN COILLIE, E., VAN DONGEN, S. and LENS, L. (2008) Broiler chicken health, welfare and fluctuating asymmetry in organic versus conventional production systems. Livestock Science 113: 123-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAARST, M., PADEL, S., ARSENOS, G., SUNDRUM, A., KUZNIAR, A., WALKENHORST, M., GRØVA, L. and HENRIKSEN, B.I.F. (2006) Challenges for animal health and welfare in the implementation of the EU legislation on organic livestock production: analysis of questionnaire survey among SAFO participants, in: RYMER, C., VAARST, M. & PADEL, S. (Eds) Future perspective for animal health on organic farms: main findings, conclusions and recommendations from SAFO Network, Proceedings of the 5th SAFO Workshop, pp. 43-74 (Odense, Denmark).Google Scholar
VAARST, M., PADEL, S., HOVI, M., YOUNIE, D. and SUNDRUM, A. (2005) Sustaining animal health and food safety in European organic livestock farming. Livestock Production Science 94(1-2): 61-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DE WEERD, H.A. and ELSON, A. (2006) Rearing factors that influence the propensity for injurious feather pecking in laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 62(4): 654-664.Google Scholar
WALKER A., and GORDON, S. (2003) Intake of nutrients from pasture by poultry. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 62: 253-256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WEBER, R.M., NOGOSSEK, M., SANDER, I., WANDT, B., NEUMANN, U. and GLUNDER, G. (2002) Observations on causes of death in laying hens kept in three different housing systems. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 66 (Sonderheft II): 146.Google Scholar
WEITZENBÜRGER, D., VITS, A., HAMANN, H. and DISTL, O. (2005) Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains. British Poultry Science 46(5): 553-559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WELLER, R., MCCALMAN, H. and HANCOCK, J. (2003) 100% organic livestock feeds – preparing for 2005. Report Organic Centre Wales.Google Scholar
WHAY, H.R., MAIN, D.C.J., GREEN, L.E., HEAVEN, G., HOWELL, H., MORGAN, M., PEARSON, A. and WEBSTER, A.J.F. (2007) Assessment of the behaviour and welfare of laying hens on free-range units. Veterinary Record 161: 119-128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WRIGHT, H.W., BARTLEY, K., NISBET, A.J., MCDEVITT, R.M., SPARKS, N.H., BROCKLEHURST, S. and HUNTLEY, J.F. (2009) The testing of antibodies raised against poultry red mite antigens in an in vitro feeding assay; preliminary screen for vaccine candidates. Experimental and Applied Acarology 48(1-2): 81-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZELTNER, E. and HIRT, H. (2003) Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hens in a free range system. British Poultry Science 44(4): 533-537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZELTNER, E., HIRT, H. and HAUSER, J. (2004) How to motivate laying hens to use the hen run? Proceedings of the 2nd SAFO Workshop, Witzenhausen, Germany, pp: 161-165.Google Scholar
ZOLLITSCH, W., KRISTENSEN, T., KRUTZINNA, C., MACNAEIHDE, F. and YOUNIE, D. (2004) Feeding for health and welfare: The challenge of formulating well-balanced rations in organic livestock production, in: VAARST, M., RODERICK, S., LUND, V. & LOCKERETZ, W. (Eds) Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Agriculture (CAB International).Google Scholar
ZIMMERMAN, P.H., LINDBERG, A.C., POPE, S.J., GLENN, E., BOLHUIS, J.E. and NICOL, C.J. (2006) The effect of stocking density, flock size and modified management on laying hen behaviour and welfare in a non-cage system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 111-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar