Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:02:36.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breeding strategies to improve the egg's natural defence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

I.C. Dunn
I.C. Dunn
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, Scotland, e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The risk posed by food borne pathogens in eggs has taken on a high priority for government and consumer. In Europe there has been concern that plans to move from battery cages may increase the risk from eggs. For this reason there is some pressure to demonstrate progress in reducing risk from eggs. At the level of the egg the approach has been to improve resistance of the eggshell to breakage using selection for quasi-static compression or specific gravity. The review will consider phenotypic measurement and developments in genetics and genomics that can place new tools in the hands of poultry breeders, should they want to use them.

New phenotypic measurements that better describe the physical and antibacterial properties of the egg and eggshell need to be developed which accurately measure the egg's natural defence characteristics to complement the developments in chicken genomics. Acoustic resonance analysis to measure the stiffness of the eggshell and ultra-structural measurements using electron microscopy in pedigree populations are methods which have been examined. Also organic matrix measurements, antimicrobial properties and bacterial penetration measurements that have only been of academic interest may be used in test populations. Genetics and genomics can be used with these phenotypic measurements to identify genetic markers that can be used in selection programmes, rather than the measurements themselves, using whole genome scans for quantitative trait loci and association analysis with candidate genes. The availability of the chicken genome sequence and EST resources has made carrying out these analyses easier in pedigree breeding flocks.

Keywords

geneticsgenomicsegg-qualityESTSNP
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 458 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, K.J. and Griffiths, M.W. (2001) Use of luminescent Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 33291 to assess eggshell colonization and penetration in fresh and retail eggs. Journal of Food Protection 64: 2058–2062.Google Scholar
Arias, J.L., Fernandez, M.S., Dennis, J.E. and Caplan, A.I. (1991) Collagens of the chicken eggshell membranes. Connective Tissue Research 26: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arias, J.L., Nakamura, O., Fernandez, M.S., Wu, J.J., Knigge, P., Eyre, D.R. and Caplan, A.I. (1997) Role of type X collagen on experimental mineralization of eggshell membranes. Connective Tissue Research 36: 21–33.Google Scholar
Bader, J.S. (2001) The relative power of SNPs and haplotype as genetic markers for association tests. Pharmacogenomics 2: 11–24.Google Scholar
Bain, M.M. (1992) eggshell strength – a relationship between the mechanism of failure and the ultrastructural organization of the mammillary layer. British Poultry Science 33: 303–319.Google Scholar
Ball, R.F., Logan, V. and Hill, J.F. (1975) Factors affecting cuticle of egg as measured by intensity of staining. Poultry Science 54: 1479–1484.Google Scholar
Baron, F., Gautier, M. and Brule, G. (1997) Factors involved in the inhibition of growth of Salmonella enteritidis in liquid egg white. Journal of Food Protection 60: 1318–1323.Google Scholar
Berrang, M.E., Cox, N.A., Frank, J.F. and Buhr, R.J. (1999) Bacterial penetration of the eggshell and shell membranes of the chicken hatching egg: A review. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8: 499–504.Google Scholar
Berrang, M.E., Frank, J.F., Buhr, R.J., Bailey, J.S., Cox, N.A. and Mauldin, J. (1998) Eggshell characteristics and penetration by Salmonella through the productive life of a broiler breeder flock Poultry Science 77: 1446–1450.Google Scholar
Board, R.G. and Halls, N.A. (1973) Cuticle – barrier to liquid and particle penetration of shell of hens egg. British Poultry Science 14: 69–91.Google Scholar
Boardman, P.E., Sanz-Ezquerro, J., Overton, I.M., Burt, D.W., Bosch, E., Fong, W.T., Tickle, C., Brown, W.R.A., Wilson, S.A. and Hubbard, S.J. (2002) A comprehensive collection of chicken cDNAs. Current Biology 12: 1965–1969.Google Scholar
Cargill, M., Altshuler, D., Ireland, J., Sklar, P., Ardlie, K., Patil, N., Lane, C.R., Lim, E.P., Kalyanaraman, N., Nemesh, J., Ziaugra, L., Friedland, L., Rolfe, A., Warrington, J., Lipshutz, R., Daley, G.Q. and Lander, E.S. (1999) Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nature Genetics 22: 231–238.Google Scholar
Carnarius, K.M., Conrad, K.M., Mast, M.G. and Macneil, J.H. (1996) Relationship of eggshell ultrastructure and shell strength to the soundness of shell eggs. Poultry Science 75: 656–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Clarke, R.C. and Griffiths, M.W. (1996) Use of luminescent strains of Salmonella enteritidis to monitor contamination and survival in eggs. Journal of Food Protection S59: 915–921.Google Scholar
Cogburn, L.A., Wang, X., Carre, W., Rejto, L., Porter, T.E., Aggrey, S.E. and Simon, J. (2003) Systems-wide chicken DNA microarrays, gene expression profiling, and discovery of functional genes. Poultry Science 82: 939–951.Google Scholar
Coucke, P., Dewil, E., Decuypere, E. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. (1999) Measuring the mechanical stiffness of an eggshell using resonant frequency analysis. British Poultry Science 40: 227–232.Google Scholar
De Ketelaere, B., Vanhoutte, H. and DE BAERDEMAEKER, J. (2003) Parameter estimation and multivariable model building for the non-destructive, on-line determination of the eggshell strength. Journal of Sound and Vibration 266: 699–709.Google Scholar
De Koning, D.J., Visscher, P.M., Knott, S.A. and Haley, C.S. (1998) Astrategy for QTL detection in half-sib populations. Animal Science 67: 257–268.Google Scholar
De Koning, D.J., Windsor, D., Hocking, P.M., Burt, D.W., Law, A., Haley, C.S., Morris, A., Vincent, J. and Griffin, H. (2003) Quantitative trait locus detection in commercial broiler lines using candidate regions. Journal of Animal Science 81: 1158–1165.Google Scholar
Defra, (2004) Egg Statistics Notice16 January.Google Scholar
Dunn, I.C., Bain, M., Edmond, A., Wilson, P.W., Joseph, N., Solomon, S., De Ketelaere, B., De Baerdemaeker, J., Preisinger, R. and WADDINGTON, D. (2004) Heritability and genetic correlation of measurements derived from acoustic resonance frequency analysis; a novel method of determining egg shell quality in domestic hens. British Poultry Science (in press).Google Scholar
Dunn, I.C., Miao, Y.W., Morris, A., Romanov, M.N., Wilson, P.W. and Waddington, D. (2004) A study of association between genetic markers in candidate genes and reproductive traits in one generation of a commercial broiler breeder hen population. Heredity 92: 128–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, M.S., Araya, M. and Arias, J.L. (1997) Eggshells are shaped by a precise spatio-temporal arrangement of sequentially deposited macromolecules. Matrix Biology 16: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, A.C., Bain, M.M. and Solomon, S.E. (1999)Transmission electron microscopy of the vertical crystal layer and cuticle of the eggshell of the domestic fowl. British Poultry Science 40: 626–631.Google Scholar
Gautron, J., Hincke, M.T. and Nys, Y. (1997) Precursor matrix proteins in the uterine fluid change with stages of eggshell formation in hens. Connective Tissue Research 36: 195–210.Google Scholar
Gautron, J., Hincke, M.T., Mann, K., Panheleux, M., Bain, M., Mckee, M.D., Solomon, S.E. and Nys, Y. (2001) Ovocalyxin-32, a novel chicken eggshell matrix protein – Isolation, amino acid sequencing, cloning, and immunocytochemical localization. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276: 39243–39252.Google Scholar
Grunder, A.A., Fairfull, R.W., Hamilton, R.M.G. and Thompson, B.K. (1991) Correlations between measures of eggshell quality or percentage of intact eggs and various economic traits. Poultry Science 70: 1855–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincke, M.T. (1995) Ovalbumin is a component of the chicken eggshell matrix Connective Tissue Research 31: 227–233.Google Scholar
Hincke, M.T., Gautron, J., Tsang, C.P., Mckee, M.D. and Nys, Y. (1999) Molecular cloning and ultrastructural localisation of the core protein of an eggshell matrix proteoglycan, ovocleidin-116. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 32915–32923.Google Scholar
Hocking, P.M. (2003) Review of QTL mapping results in poultry. 3rd European Poultry Genetics Symposium, 17–19 09 2003, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Hunton, P. (1982) genetic-factors affecting eggshell quality. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 38: 75–84.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, H.R., Iwamori, E., Sugimoto, Y. and Aoki, T. (1998) Identification of a distinct antibacterial domain within the N-lobe of ovotransferrin. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Molecular Cell Research 1401: 289–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, N., Milona, P., Wilson, P.W., Preisinger, R. and Dunn, I.C.. (2003) Can SNP genetic markers in commercial lines of poultry be predicted from EST databases? 3rd European Poultry Genetics Symposium, 17–19 09 2003, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kim, H., Schmidt, C.J., Decker, K.S. and Emara, M.G. (2003) Adouble-screening method to identify reliable candidate non-synonymous SNPs from chicken EST data. Animal Genetics 34: 249–254.Google Scholar
Kramer, J., Malek, M. and Lamont, S.J. (2003) Association of twelve candidate gene polymorphisms and response to challenge with Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. Animal Genetics 34: 339–348.Google Scholar
Lascalajr, N., Boleli, I.C., Ribeiro, L.T. and Macari, M. (2000) Pore size distribution in chicken eggs as determined by mercury porosimetry. Revista Brasileira de Ci^ncia Avícola 2:177–181.Google Scholar
Lamont, S.J., Lakshmanan, N., Plotsky, Y., Kaiser, M.G., Kuhn, M., Arthur, J.A., Beck, N.J. and Osullivan, N.P. (1996) Genetic markers linked to quantitative traits in poultry. Animal Genetics 27: 1–8.Google Scholar
Marth, G.T., Korf, I., Yandell, M.D., Yeh, R.T., Gu, Z., Zakeri, H., Stitziel, N.O., Hillier, L., Kwok, P. and Gish, W.R. (1999) A general approach to single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery. Nature Genetics 23: 452–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miksik, I., Charvatova, J., Eckhardt, A. and Deyl, Z., (2003) Insoluble eggshell matrix proteins – their peptide mapping and partial characterization by capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography. Electrophoresis 24: 843–852.Google Scholar
Mine, Y., Oberle, C. and Kassify, Z. (2003) Eggshell matrix proteins as defense mechanism of avian eggs. Journal of Agricultural And Food Chemistry 51: 249–253.Google Scholar
Nascimento, V.P., Cranstoun, S. and Solomon, S.E. (1992) Relationship between shell structure and movement of salmonella-enteritidis across the eggshell wall. British Poultry Science 33: 37–48.Google Scholar
Nys, Y. (1999a) Nutritional factors affecting eggshell quality. Czech Journal of Animal Science 44: 135–143.Google Scholar
Nys, Y., Hincke, M.T., Arias, J.L., Garcia-Ruiz, J.M. and Solomon, S.E. (1999b) Avian eggshell mineralization. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 10: 143–166.Google Scholar
Odum, L. (1987) Trypsin-inhibitory activity of ovalbumin preparations is due to ovomucoid. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 368: 1603–1606.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A., Thomas, U., Bramaz, N., Klauser, S. and Vonfellenberg, R. (1997) Identification and isolation of a bactericidal domain in chicken egg white lysozyme. Journal of Applied Microbiology 82: 372–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pines, M., Knopov, V. and Bar, A. (1995) Involvement of osteopontin in eggshell formation in the laying chicken. Matrix Biology 14: 765–771.Google Scholar
Preisinger, R. and Flock, D.K. (2000) Genetic changes in layer breeding: Historical trends and future prospects. Occasional Publications of the British Society of Animal Science 27: 20–28.Google Scholar
Reynard, M. and Savory, C.J. (1999) Stress-induced oviposition delays in laying hens: duration and consequences for eggshell quality. British Poultry Science 40: 585–591.Google Scholar
Risch, N. and Merikangas, K. (1996) The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273: 1516–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothschild, M.F. and Soller, M. (1997) Candidate gene analysis to detect traits of economic importance in domestic livestock. Probe 8: 13–20.Google Scholar
Saxena, I. and Tayyab, S. (1997) Protein proteinase inhibitors from avian egg whites. Cellular And Molecular Life Sciences 53: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seaton, G., Haley, C.S., Knott, S.A., Kearsey, M. and Visscher, P.M. (2002) QTL Express: mapping quantitative trait loci in of simple and complex pedigrees. Bioinformatics 18: 339–340.Google Scholar
Seydim, A.C. and Dawson, P.L. (1999) Packaging effects on shell egg breakage rates during simulated transportation. Poultry Science 78: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparks, N.H.C. and Board, R.G. (1984) Cuticle, shell porosity and water-uptake through hens eggshells. British Poultry Science 25: 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuiskula-Haavisto, M., Honkatukia, M., Vilkki, J., De Koning, D.J., Schulman, N.F. and Maki-Tanila, A. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting quality and production traits in egg layers. Poultry Science 81: 919–927.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. and Fowler, S. (1978) Distribution of organic cores, cones, cone junctions and pores in eggshells of wild birds. Journal of Zoology 186: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Toledo, B., Parsons, A.H. and Combs, G.F. (1982) Role of ultrastructure in determining eggshell strength. Poultry Science 61: 569–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, M.L., Baron, F., Ahmed, A., Michel, J., Sellier, N., Gautron, J., Protais, M., Beaumont, C., Gautier, M. and Nys, Y. (2003) Genetic variability in the anti-microbial activity of hen egg white. British Poultry Science 44: 791–792.Google Scholar
Vignal, A., Milan, D., Sancristobal, M. and Eggen, A. (2002) A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genetics Selection Evolution 34: 275–305.Google Scholar
Wardecka, B., Olszewski, R., Jaszczak, K., Zieba, G. and Pierzchala, M. (2003) Preliminary mapping of QTLs affecting egg quality on chromosomes 1–5 in chickens. Czech Journal of Animal Science 48: 97–105.Google Scholar
Weller, J.I., Kashi, Y. and SOLLER, M. (1990) Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy-cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 2525–2537.Google Scholar
Wong, M., Hendrix, M.J.C., Vondermark, K., Little, C. and Stern, R. (1984) Collagen in the eggshell membranes of the hen. Developmental Biology 104: 28–36.Google Scholar