Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:53:16.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Metamorphosis of the Stalin Myth*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Robert C. Tucker
Affiliation:
Social Science Division of the RAND Corporation
Get access

Extract

THE death of Joseph Stalin marked the beginning of a new period in the history of the Soviet regime in Russia. It set in motion a train of events in the internal political life of the country which, for better or for worse, will alter the political personality of the Soviet regime as the world came to know it under the influence of Stalin's dominating figure. No one can yet predict with any confidence how this sequence of events will unfold in the years to come. The most that can be done at this early stage is to visualize the forces at work behind the scenes and strive to reach an informed preliminary guess about the direction or directions in which these forces are moving.

That is the task of the present article. It seeks to investigate certain aspects of the post-Stalin train of events which are now themselves a part of history. Its purpose is to cast light upon some of the principal trends and issues in the internal political life of Soviet Russia since Stalin died. These trends and issues are for the most part hidden beneath the surface of Soviet public life; only occasionally, as in the Beria episode, have they erupted into full view of a perplexed and fascinated world. It is necessary, therefore, to study the submerged political realities through their indirect reflection in the public pronouncements of the controlled and official Soviet press. The central importance of the new regime‘s attitude toward Stalin and the Stalin heritage directs attention upon the changing manner in which the official propaganda has presented the image of Stalin to the Soviet people. We shall first tell the factual story of this process, tracing the steps by which Stalin‘s heirs successively dethroned him, partially restored him, and finally refashioned an entirely new Stalin image to fit their present needs. The latter part of the article attempts to interpret the political meaning of the new Stalin myth and of another new phenomenon closely associated with it, the “cult of the Party”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Economist (May 9, 1953), p. 370.

2 pravda, April i6, 1953.

4 Pravda, April 25, 1953.

5 Pravda, May 14, 1953.

6 Pravda, May 29, 1953.

7 Vishnyakov, A., “K voprosu o dialektike razvitiia sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva” (“On the Question of the Dialectic of the Development of the Socialist Society”), Kommunist, No. xo (July 1953), p. 34.Google Scholar

8 Konstantinov, R., “Rol' sotsialisticheskoi ideologii v razvitii sotsialisticheskogo obshchestva” (“The Role of the Socialist Ideology in the Development of the Socialist Society”), Kommunist, No. 13 (September 1953), p. 60.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., p. 61.

10 Kommunist, No. 12 (August 1953), p. 37; unsigned editorial entitled “Narod—Tvorets Istorii” (“The People—Creator of History”).

11 Ibid., p. 46.

12 Pravda, March 17, 1953.

13 Pravda, July 26, 1953.

14 Pravda, August 9, 1953.

15 Pravda, September 13, 1953.

16 Izvestia, March 5, 1954.

17 Pravda, March 5, 1954.