Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T10:33:25.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Hypothesis About the Nature of an Archaic Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Regrettably, the author has not quite succeeded in eliminating signs of moral condescension and impatience with the people for failing to act as they should for their own good.

2 At the present, we hear, the mortality rate is very low, a change which the author attributes, as a matter of course, to antibiotics (p. 167). The validity of this interpretation could only be judged if one knew whether the killers which are now taking a diminished toll are diseases responsive to antibiotics and whether antibiotics have actually been administered to the survivors. But even if that were proved, it would still not be conclusive that credit for the lowered death rate belongs to the new drugs. There are other possibilities; their introduction could, e.g., have coincided with a decline in the toxicity of some invading organisms or the increased adaptation of the human population to them, both on the ground of evolutionary changes. (Cf. Dubos, René, The Mirage of Health, New York, 1959.)Google Scholar Also, the lowering of the death rate in general does not necessarily indicate that the life expectancy of the parents of young children has increased. These are minor points in the context of the study, but they suggest that Banfield's conclusions cannot always be taken at face value.

3 “Psychoanalysis and the Social Structure,” Psychoanalytic Quarterly, XIX (1950), pp. 371–84.