Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:57:27.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clients and Communities

The Political Economy of Party Network Organization and Development in India’s Urban Slums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Adam Michael Auerbach
Get access

Abstract

India’s urban slums exhibit dramatic variation in their levels of infrastructural development and access to public services. Why are some vulnerable communities able to demand and secure development from the state while others fail to? Based on ethnographic fieldwork and original household survey data, the author finds that party networks significantly influence the ability of poor urban communities to organize and demand development. In slums with dense party networks, competition among party workers generates a degree of accountability in local patron-client hierarchies that encourages development. Dense party networks also strengthen organizational capacity and provide settlements with vertical connectivity to politicians and officials. The presence of multiparty networks, however, may attenuate the positive influence of party network density. Interviews with political elites and the survey data suggest that politicians are less likely to provide services to slums with multiparty networks. From within settlements, partisan competition also creates perverse incentives for rival networks to undermine each other’s development efforts. This article contributes to scholarship on clientelism, which has overlooked variation in the density and partisan balance of patron-client networks across poor urban communities and the resulting divergences in democratic responsiveness and development that face those communities. It also contributes to research on distributive politics and the political economy of development.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 111 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, Arun, and Goyal, Sanjeev. 2001. “Group Size and Collective Action: Third-Party Monitoring in Common-pool Resources.” Comparative Political Studies 34, no. 1 (February): 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza, and Easterly, William. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 4 (November): 1243–84.Google Scholar
Amis, Philip, and Kumar, Sashi. 2000. “Urban Economic Growth, Infrastructure and Poverty in India: Lessons from Visakhapatnam.” Environment and Urbanization 12, no. 1 (April): 185–96.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael. 2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103, no. 484 (December): 1481–95.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael. 2015. Supplementary material. At http://dx.doi.org.10.1017/S0043887115000313.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2001. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks & the Legacy of Evita. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, Iyer, Lakshmi, and Somanathan, Rohini. 2005. “History, Social Divisions, and Public Goods in Rural India.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3, no. 2–3 (April–May): 639–47.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Solomon. 2000. “Governance, Economic Settings and Poverty in Bangalore.” Environment and Urbanization 12, no. 35 (April): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamini, Yoav, Krieger, Abba M., and Yekutieli, Daniel. 2006. “Adaptive Linear Step-Up Procedures that Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika 93, no. 3: 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William, Golder, Matt, and Milton, Daniel. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories of Positing Interaction.” Journal of Politics 74, no. 3 (July): 653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, Mridula. 2010. Urban Slums and Poverty. Jaipur, Rajasthan: Ritu Publications.Google Scholar
Breeding, Mary. 2011. “The Micro-Politics of Vote Banks in Karnataka.” Economic and Political Weekly 46, no. 14 (April 2): 71–77.Google Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39, no. 2 ( June): 66–88.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Jeffrey, Daniere, Amrita, and Takahashi, Lois. 2004. “Cooperation, Trust, and Social Capital in Southeast Asian Urban Slums.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55, no. 4 (December): 533–51.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 2004. Politics of the Governed: Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chhibber, Pradeep, and Nooruddin, Irfan. 2004. “Do Party Systems Count? The Number of Parties and Government Performance in the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 37, no. 2 (March): 152–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbridge, Stuart, Williams, Glyn, Srivastava, Manoj, and Véron, René. 2005. Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dosh, Paul. 2010. Demanding the Land: Urban Popular Movements in Peru and Ecuador, 1990–2005. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Brent, and Mitra, Arup. 2007. “Slums as Vote Banks and Residents’ Access to Basic Amenities: The Role of Political Contact.” Indian Journal of Human Development 1: 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ermakoff, Ivan. 2011. “Patrimony and Collective Capacity: An Analytical Outline.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636, no. 1 ( July): 182–203.Google Scholar
Field, Erica. 2007. “Entitled to Work: Urban Tenure Security and Labor Supply in Peru.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 4, no. 122 (November): 1561–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. “The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico.” World Politics 46, no. 2 ( January): 151–84.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert. 1994. Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, de Jonge, Chad Kiewiet, Melendez, Carlos, Osorio, Javier, and Nickerson, David. 2012. “Vote Buying and Social Desirability Bias: Experimental Evidence from Nicaragua.” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 1 ( January): 202–17.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N. and Weinstein, Jeremy M., 2011. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemmas of Collective Action. New York, N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Harriss, John. 2005. “Political Participation, Representation, and the Urban Poor.” Economic and Political Weekly 40, no. 11 (March 12–18): 1041–54.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2000. “Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India.” World Politics 52, no. 4 (July): 484–519.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14, June: 289–310.Google Scholar
Houtzager, Peter, and Acharya, Arnab. 2011. “Associations, Active Citizenship, and the Quality of Democracy in Brazil and Mexico.” Theory and Society 40, no. 1: 1–36.Google Scholar
Jha, Saumitra, Rao, Vijayendra, and Woolcock, Michael. 2007. “Governance in the Gullies: Democratic Responsiveness and Leadership in Delhi's Slums.” World Development 35, no. 2: 230–46.Google Scholar
Keefer, Phillip. 2007. “Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 4 (October): 804–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2012. Poverty Amid Plenty in the New India. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2002. Active Social Capital. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2011. “Gaining Access to Public Services and the Democratic State in India: Institutions in the Middle.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46, no. 1 (March): 98–117.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2013. “Stuck in Place: Investigating Social Mobility in 14 Bangalore Slums.” Journal of Development Studies 49, no. 7: 1010–28.Google Scholar
Kruks-Wisner, Gabrielle. 2014. “Exit, Voice, and Citizenship: Citizen Claim-Making and Service Delivery in Rural India.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C., August 28–31.Google Scholar
Lall, Somik, Suri, Ajay, and Deichmann, Uwe. 2006. “Household Savings and Residential Mobility in Informal Settlements in Bhopal, India.” Urban Studies 43, no. 7 ( June): 1025–39.Google Scholar
Lanjouw, Jean, and Levy, Philip. 2002. “Untitled: A Study of Formal and Informal Property Rights in Urban Ecuador.” Economic Journal 112, no. 482 (October): 986–1019.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 2000. “Small-Time Political Fixers in India's States.” Asian Survey 40: 816–35.Google Scholar
Miguel, Edward. 2004. “Tribe or Nation? Nation Building and Public Goods in Kenya versus Tanzania.” World Politics 56, no. 3 (April): 327–62.Google Scholar
Mitra, Arup. 2010. “Migration, Livelihood and Well-Being: Evidence from Indian City-Slums.” Urban Studies 47, no. 7 ( July): 1371–90.Google Scholar
Mitra, Banashree. 1988. Impact of Tenure Regularization and Environmental Upgrading Programs on Shelter Consolidation in Squatter Settlements in Bhopal. Indian Human Settlements Program, Research Report 13. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102, no. 1 (February): 19–31.Google Scholar
Office of the Registrar General and Census Commisioner. 2013. Primary Abstract for Slum, 2011. New Delhi, India: Census of India. At http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/Slum-26-09-13.pdf, accessed July 28, 2015.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Philip. 1987. “Middlemen in Third-World Corruption: Implications of an Indian Case.” World Politics 39, no. 4 ( July): 508–35.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2011. “Can Informed Voters Enforce Better Governance? Experiments in Low Income Democracies.” Annual Review of Economics 3 (September): 215–37.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saez, Lawrence, and Sinha, Aseema. 2010. “Political Cycles, Political Institutions, and Public Expenditure in India, 1980–2000.” British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 1: 91–113.Google Scholar
Sankhe, Shirish, Vittal, Ireena, Dobbs, Richard, Mohan, Ajit, Gulati, Ankur, Ablett, Jonathan, Gupta, Shishir, Kim, Alex, Paul, Sudipto, Sanghvi, Aditya, and Sethy, Gurpreet. 2010. “India's Urban Awakening: Building Inclusive Cities, Sustaining Economic Growth.” McKinsey Global Institute Report. Delhi, India: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
Shami, Mahvish. 2012. “Collective Action, Clientelism, and Connectivity.” American Political Science Review 106, no. 3 (August): 588–606.Google Scholar
Sinha, Aseema. 2005. The Regional Roots of Developmental Politics in India: A Divided Leviathan. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99, no. 3 (August): 315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2011. “Embedded Mobilization: Nonstate Service Provision as Electoral Strategy in India.” World Politics 63, no. 3 ( July): 434–69.Google Scholar
Tsai, Lily. 2007. Democracy without Accountability: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat. 1982. Survey of Slum and Squatter Settlements. Dublin, Ireland: Tycooly International.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat. 2006. State of the World's Cities (2006/2007). London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2003. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics 55 (April): 399–422.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Auerbach supplementary material

Auerbach supplementary material 1

Download Auerbach supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 37 MB