Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:21:11.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Response of Certain Crops to 2,4–Dichlorophenoxy-acetic Acid in Irrigation Water: Part I. Red Mexican Beans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

V. F. Bruns
V. F. Bruns*
Affiliation:
Field Crops Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, Irrigation Experiment Station, Prosser, Washington
Get access

Extract

Numerous investigations in which crop plants were utilized to study the effect, persistence, and movement of spray residues of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4–D) in a variety of soils and under a wide range of conditions have been reported. However, except for a report by Arle (1), a search of the literature has revealed no direct information on the effects of 2,4–D when applied in irrigation water to crop plants growing in the field. Arle treated cotton with irrigation water containing 2,4–D in equivalents ranging from 0.5 to 8 pounds per acre. Significant decreases in yield usually resulted from the higher rates of treatment when applications were made early in the season. Applications at the lower rates usually resulted in yields about equal to or greater than those obtained from check plots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1954 , pp. 359 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. Fred. The effect of 2,4–D on the growth and yield of cotton (Acala 44). Research Prog. Report Fourteenth Western Weed Control conf. P. 84. 1954.Google Scholar
2. DeRose, H. Robert. Persistence of some plant growth-regulators when applied to the soil in herbicidal treatments. Bot. Gaz. 107: 583–589. 1946.Google Scholar
3. Elle, George O. Some environmental factors affecting the response of sweet corn to 2,4–D. Weeds 1: 141–159. 1952.Google Scholar
4. Hanks, Robert W. Removal of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and its calcium salt from six different soils by leaching. Bot. Gaz. 108: 186–191. 1946.Google Scholar
5. Hernandez, T. P., and Warren, G. F. Some factors affecting the rate of inactivation and leaching of 2,4–D in different soils. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. 56: 287–293. 1950.Google Scholar
6. Muzik, T. J., Loustalot, A. J., and Cruzado, H. J. Movement of 2,4–D in soil. Amer. Soc. Agron. Jour. 43: 149–150. 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Oborn, E. T., and Hartley, T. R. Tolerance of Crops to Herbicides in irrigation water. Joint Lab. Rpt. No. SI–3, U.S.D.A. Field Crops Research Branch and U.S.D.I. Bur. of Reclamation Chem. and Eng. Lab., Denver, Colorado. 16 pp. April 15, 1954.Google Scholar