Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:51:39.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wild Mustard (Brassica kaber) Resistance to Ethametsulfuron But Not to Other Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. Mark Jeffers
Affiliation:
Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
John T. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Alberta Environmental Centre, Vegreville, Alberta, Canada T9C 1T4
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, 6909-116 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 4P2

Abstract

In 1993, a wild mustard population growing in a canola crop near Wetaskiwin, AB was poorly controlled by ethametsulfuron after only one previous use of the herbicide. Controlled environment experiments were conducted to compare the response of this suspected resistant population (R) with that of a known susceptible population (S) collected near Vegreville, AB to increasing rates of ethametsulfuron, metsulfuron, chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, HOE 075032, imazamethabenz, imazethapyr, metribuzin, and 2,4-D. The R wild mustard population was highly resistant to ethametsulfuron, slightly resistant to low rates of metsulfuron but not resistant to any of the other herbicides tested. This suggests that the mechanism of resistance may differ from that reported for other sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Since resistance was documented after only 2 yr of ethametsulfuron use, the initial frequency of resistance to this herbicide in wild mustard populations may be very high. Dry weight of untreated plants did not differ significantly between the S and R populations suggesting little or no differences in competitiveness between them.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackshaw, R. E., Anderson, G. W., and Dekker, J. 1987. Interference of Sinapis arvensis L. and Chenopodium album L. in spring canola (Brassica napus). Weed Res. 27:207213.Google Scholar
2. Boutsalis, P. and Powles, S. B. 1995. Resistance of dicot weeds to acetolactate synthase(ALS)-inhibiting herbicides in Australia. Weed Res. 35:149155.Google Scholar
3. Boutsalis, P. and Powles, S. B. 1995. Inheritance and mechanism of resistance to herbicides inhibiting acetolactate synthase in Sonchus oleraceus L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91:242247.Google Scholar
4. Christopher, J. T., Powles, S. B., Liljegren, D. L., and Holtum, J.A.M. 1992. Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) involves at least two mechanisms. Plant. Physiol. 100:19091913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Devine, M. D., Maries, M.A.S., and Hall, L. M. 1991. Inhibition of acetolactate synthase insusceptible and resistant biotypes of Stellaria media . Pestic. Sci. 31:273280.Google Scholar
6. Hall, L. M. and Devine, M. D. 1990. Cross-resistance of a chlorsulfuron-resistant biotype of Stellaria media to a triazolopyrimidine herbicide. Plant Physiol. 93:962966.Google Scholar
7. Kudsk, P., Mathiassen, S. K., and Cotterman, J. C. 1995. Sulfonylurea resistance in Stellaria media [L.] Vill. Weed Res. 35:1924.Google Scholar
8. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163168.Google Scholar
9. Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:169172.Google Scholar
10. O'Donovan, J. T., Jeffers, G. M., Maurice, D., and Sharma, M. P. 1994. Investigation of a chlorsulfuron-resistant chickweed [Stellaria media (L.) Vill.] population. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:693697.Google Scholar
11. Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169172.Google Scholar
12. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron. Plant Physiol. 75:827831.Google Scholar
13. Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. p. 83139 in Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Biology and Biochemistry. ed. Powles, S. P. and Holtum, J. A. M. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
14. Shires, A., Bell, J. M., Keith, M. O., and McGregor, D. I. 1982. Rapeseed dockage. Effects of feeding raw and processed wild mustard and stinkweed on growth and feed utilization of mice. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 62:275285.Google Scholar
15. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc. 1987. SAS/STAT™ guide for personal computers, Version 6 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 1028 p.Google Scholar
16. Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1994. Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42:172179.Google Scholar