Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:56:36.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Management Strategies for Conservation-Tillage Sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Randy L. Anderson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Akron, CO 80702
Drew J. Lyon
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Don L. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Mandan, ND 58554

Abstract

We compared applications of trifluralin or ethalfluralin granules incorporated with a sweep plow or pendimethalin (ec) applied without incorporation to incorporating trifluralin (ec) by tandem-disk harrowing for sunflower production. The study was established in winter wheat stubble at three sites in the northern and central Great Plains. Crop residues on the soil surface following sunflower planting was greater than 30% (level required to protect soil from erosion) with all conservation-tillage strategies, but not with disk incorporation. Weed control and sunflower seed yield with conservation-tillage strategies were similar to the disk incorporation practice, demonstrating that producers can use these strategies for sunflower production and to protect soil from erosion.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, W. H. and Endres, G. J. 1994. Effectiveness of herbicide granules in conservation tillage. p. 129134 in A Future Using Residue Management Symposium. Great Plains Agric. Counc. Bull. No. 150.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, R. L. 1986. Pendimethalin for summer annual weed control in a chemical fallow program. West. Soc. Weed. Sci. Res. Rep. p. 286.Google Scholar
3. Anderson, R. L. 1990. Tolerance of safflower, corn, and proso millet to clomazone. Weed Technol. 4:606611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Berglund, D. R., ed. 1994. Sunflower Production. N. D. St. Univ. Ext. Serv. Bull. 25. Fargo, ND. 98 p.Google Scholar
5. Bilbro, J. D. 1992. Sunflower dry matter production and plant structural relationships for wind erosion modeling. J. Soil Water Conserv. 47:194197.Google Scholar
6. Black, A. L. and Bauer, A. 1990. Sunflower yields as affected by conservation tillage systems and N-fertilization. Proc. Great Plains Soil Fert. Conf. 3:204209.Google Scholar
7. Black, A. L. and Bauer, A. 1992. Soil fertility and tillage management for sunflower production in the Great Plains. Proc. Great Plains Soil Fert. Conf. 4:7176.Google Scholar
8. Deibert, E. J. 1987. Sunflower production comparisons with conventional and reduced tillage systems. North Dakota Farm Res. 44(5): 2529.Google Scholar
9. Deibert, E. J. 1989. Reduced tillage system influence on yield of sunflower hybrids. Agron. J. 81:274279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fenster, C. R., Flowerday, A. D., and Robinson, L. R. 1971. Incorporation of EPTC and trifluralin for weed control in field beans. Agron. J. 63:214216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Greb, B. W. 1983. Water conservation: Central Great Plains. p. 5772 in Dregne, H. E. and Willis, W. O., ed. Dryland Agriculture. Agron. Monogr. 23. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
12. Jones, O. R. 1984. Yield, water-use efficiency, and oil concentration and quality of dryland sunflower grown in the Southern High Plains. Agron. J. 76:229235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Laflen, J. M., Amemiya, M., and Hintz, E. A. 1981. Measuring crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36:341343.Google Scholar
14. Lyon, D. J. and Anderson, R. L. 1993. Crop response to fallow applications of atrazine and clomazone. Weed Technol. 7:949953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Miller, S. D. 1991. Weed management in conservation tillage cropping systems. Proc. Colorado Conserv. Tillage Assoc. 1:910.Google Scholar
16. Nielsen, D. C. and Hinkle, S. E. 1994. Wind velocity, snow, and soil water measurements in sunflower residues. p. 93100 in A Future Using Residue Management Symposium. Great Plains Agric. Council Bull. No. 150.Google Scholar
17. Peterson, G. A., Westfall, D. G., and Cole, C. V. 1993. Agroecosystem approach to soil and crop management research. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:13541360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Robinson, L. R. and Fenster, C. R. 1968. Residual effects of EPTC and trifluralin incorporated with different implements. Weed Sci. 16:415417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Skidmore, E. L. and Siddoway, F. H. 1978. Crop residue requirements to control wind erosion. p. 1723 in Oschwald, W. R., ed. Crop Residue Management Systems. Am. Soc. Agron. Spec. Publ. 31. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
20. Smika, D. E. 1990. Fallow management practices for wheat production in the Central Great Plains. Agron. J. 82:319323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Unger, P. W. 1981. Tillage effects on wheat and sunflower grown in rotation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:941945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Unger, P. W. 1984. Tillage and residue effects on wheat, sorghum, and sunflower grown in rotation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:885891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Wicks, G. A., Crutchfield, D. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1994. Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 42:141147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Wrage, L. J. 1990. Early preplant herbicides. Great Plains Agric. Counc. Bull. 131:233239.Google Scholar