Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:24:16.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nicosulfuron Tolerance in Sweet Corn (Zea mays) as Affected by Hybrid, Rootworm Insecticide, and Nicosulfuron Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bill J. Williams  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Bill J. Williams
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sweet corn tolerance to nicosulfuron as affected by interactions between nicosulfuron applied postemergence (POST), sweet corn hybrid, and rootworm insecticide applied at planting was determined in 1992 and 1993 field experiments. Sweet corn vigor was reduced as nicosulfuron rate increased from 35 to 140 g ai/ha. Sweet corn vigor was reduced 4% more by nicosulfuron with oil emulsifier mixture than nicosulfuron with non-ionic surfactant one week after treatment (WAT). Adjuvant selection did not influence nicosulfuron injury to sweet corn 2 WAT. Nicosulfuron applied postemergence directed (PDIR) caused less sweet corn injury than nicosulfuron applied broadcast POST. ‘Jubilee’ sweet corn was more sensitive to nicosulfuron and insecticide treatments than ‘Excellency’ or ‘Green Giant 40.’ Nicosulfuron reduced sweet corn vigor twice as much when terbufos was applied at planting compared to no insecticide at planting. Neither chlorpyrifos or chlorethoxyfos at planting increased sweet corn injury due to nicosulfuron compared to no insecticide. Excellency and Green Giant 40 yields were not reduced by any treatment. Yields were reduced only when nicosulfuron was applied to Jubilee treated with terbufos. Jubilee yield reduction from nicosulfuron and terbufos was prevented by applying nicosulfuron PDIR.

Keywords

Chlorethoxyfos, phosphorothioic acid, O,O-diethyl O-(1,2,2,2-tetrachloroethyl)esterchlorpyrifos, O,O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl)-phosphorothioatenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideterbufos, 5-[[(1,1-dimethylethyl)thio]methyl] O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioatecorn, Zea mays L.Adjuvantherbicide injuryinsecticide interactionmaizeorganophosphatesynergismsurfactantsulfonylurea
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 488 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baerg, R. J. and Barrett, M. 1993. Insecticide modifications of cytochrome P450 mediated herbicide metabolism. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:70.Google Scholar
2. Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1992. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. 1957. Experimental Designs. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York. p. 306–309.Google Scholar
4. Diehl, K. E. and Stoller, E. W. 1993. Effect of terbufos and its metabolites on the uptake and metabolism of nicosulfuron in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:90.Google Scholar
5. duPont, E. I. de Nemours and Co. 1993. p. 25–30 in DuPont Agricultural Products Manual. E. I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898.Google Scholar
6. Green, J. M. 1994. Naturally occurring sweet corn tolerance can overcome the interaction of nicosulfuron and terbufos. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:14.Google Scholar
7. Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G. and McNevin, G. R. 1990. Combining cultural practices and herbicides to control wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Technol. 4:433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:999–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kleppe, C. D. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Postemergence-directed herbicides control wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:746–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kleppe, C. D. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Postemergence-directed sprayers for wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control. Weed Technol. 5:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Monks, D. W., Mullins, C. A., and Johnson, K. E. 1992. Resistance of sweet corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Morton, C. A. 1993. Selectivity and Efficacy of Sulfonylurea Herbicides and Wild-proso Millet Competition in Field and Sweet Corn. . University of Wisconsin-Madison, p. 48–59.Google Scholar
14. Morton, C. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1992. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1993. In-furrow terbufos reduces field and sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:934–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Wedberg, J. L., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., and Lueschen, W. E. 1994. Influence of corn rootworm insecticides on the response of field corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Nalewaja, J. D., Praczyk, T., and Matysiak, R. 1993. Salts and surfactants with nicosulfuron. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:21.Google Scholar
19. Nalewaja, J. D., Praczyk, T., and Matysiak, R. 1994. Oil and surfactant adjuvants with nicosulfuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:75.Google Scholar
20. Nalewaja, J. D., Woznica, Z., and Manthey, F. A. 1991. DPX-V9360 efficacy with adjuvants and environment. Weed Technol. 5:92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Rahman, A. and James, T. K. 1993. Enhanced activity of nicosulfuron in combination with soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:824–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., Schultheis, J. R., and Worsham, R. D. 1993. Sweet corn (Zea mays) cultivar tolerance to application timing of nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:840–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Simpson, D. M., Diehl, K. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1993. Mechanism for 2,4-D safening of nicosulfuron/terbufos interaction in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:112.Google Scholar
24. Stall, W. M. and Bewick, T. A. 1992. Sweet corn cultivars respond differentially to the herbicide nicosulfuron. HortScience 27:131–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture. Trade and Consumer Prot. 1991. Wisconsin 1991 pesticide use. Wisconsin Agric. Stat. Serv., P.O. Box 9160, Madison, WI 53715. p. 4–9.Google Scholar
26. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Prot. 1993. Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics. Wisconsin Agric. Stat. Serv., P.O. Box 9160, Madison, WI 53715. p. 5.Google Scholar