Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:29:25.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) Interference with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joy B. Rogers
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Don S. Murray
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Laval M. Verhalen
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
P. L. Claypool
Affiliation:
pep. Stat., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

Full-season interference and critical duration of early-season ivyleaf morningglory interference with cotton were measured in experiments at two Oklahoma locations. Densities ranging from 0 to 64 weeds/10 m of row were evaluated for their effects on cotton lint yield, fiber quality, and harvest efficiency. Analyses using linear-linear regression proved superior to linear, curvilinear, and linear-plateau models. Lint yield reductions of 36.9 kg/ha (or 5.9%) were recorded at Perkins for each weed/10 m up to 8.7. At densities greater than 8.7/10 m, yield was reduced an additional 3.0 kg/ha (0.5%) for each additional weed. At Chickasha, lint yield was reduced 29.7 kg/ha (or 3.9%) for each weed/10 m up to 9.0 with an additional lint loss of 3.6 kg/ha (0.7%) for each weed above the density of 9.0/10 m. Yield losses were over 80% before fiber length was also reduced. Mechanical harvest was not possible at densities above 8 weeds/10 m at Chickasha and above 16 weeds/10 m at Perkins. In critical duration experiments conducted at Perkins, lint yield was reduced 52.9 kg/ha (or 11.2%) for each week weed removal was delayed up to 9.5 wk. An additional 1.0 kg/ha (0.2%) was lost for each week of interference after 9.5 wk. At Chickasha, lint yield was reduced 49.0 kg/ha (or 7.8%) for each week of interference up to 11.0 wk with an additional loss of 1.2 kg/ha (0.2%) for each week thereafter.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., and McLaughlin, R. D. 1977. Competition of prickly sida with cotton. Weed Sci. 25:106110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1993. Report of the 1992 Cotton Weed Loss Committee. p. 1499 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc., Beltwide Cotton Conf., New Orleans, LA. Jan. 10–14, 1993. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
4. Cotton Division. 1993. The classification of cotton. USDA-AMS Agric. Handb, 566. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC. 23 p.Google Scholar
5. Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1978. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26:484488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—Southern states: Broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392407.Google Scholar
7. Green, J. D., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Full-season interference of silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:813818.Google Scholar
8. Greer, H.A.L. and Murray, D. S. 1992. Weed management in cotton. p. 4559 in Banks, J. C., Verhalen, L. M., Cuperus, G. W., and Karner, M. A., eds. Cotton Production and Pest Management in Oklahoma. Oklahoma Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. E-883.Google Scholar
9. Higgins, J. M., Walker, R. H., and Whitwell, T. 1986. Coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:5256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., and Carter, C. H. 1986. Influence of planting date on growth of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:906910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Mercer, K. L., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1987. Interference of unicorn-plant (Proboscidea louisianica) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:807812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. 1985. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 2nd ed. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL. p. 346351.Google Scholar
13. Riffle, M. S., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., and Weeks, D. L. 1989. Duration and intensity of unicorn-plant (Proboscidea louisianica) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 3:313316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rogers, J. B., Westerman, R. B., and Murray, D. S. 1993. Field interference of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:280.Google Scholar
15. Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. Buffalobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Sci. 33:810814.Google Scholar
16. Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33:815818.Google Scholar
17. SAS Institute, Inc. 1987. SAS/GRAPH® Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
18. Smith, B. S., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1990. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 4:799803.Google Scholar
19. Snipes, C. E., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30:553556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Snipes, C. E., Street, J. E., and Walker, R. H. 1987. Interference periods of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:529532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar