Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:37:46.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicides for Reduced Tillage Production in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in the Southwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar ,
A. Edwin Colburn  and
Noble S. Kearney
W. James Grichar
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Yoakum, TX 77995
A. Edwin Colburn
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., College Station, TX 77843
Noble S. Kearney
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., Uvalde, TX 78802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1988 and 1989 under dryland and irrigated conditions to determine effects of various herbicides for use in peanuts on weed control and peanut yield under a reduced tillage system. Under dryland and irrigated conditions, sethoxydim + acifluorfen consistently controlled Texas panicum. Paraquat + bentazon controlled Texas panicum poorly under dryland conditions. Pendimethalin + metolachlor provided ≥ 80% Texas panicum control under irrigated conditions.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidemetolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamideparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionpendimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminesethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onepeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner,’ ‘Pronto’Texas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTERo-tillminimum-tillagegroundnutPanicum texanumAMAPAPANTE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 212 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, W. E., Morris, H. D., Giddens, J., Dawson, R. N., and Langdale, G. W. 1973. Tillage and fertilization of corn grown on lespedeza sod. Agron. J. 65:653–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Boswell, T. E. and Grichar, W. J. 1981. Comparison of land preparation methods in peanut production. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. PR 3860. p. 2.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. Pages 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds., Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
4. Chapwell, W. E. and Link, L. A. 1977. Evaluation of herbicides in no-tillage production of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 25:511–514.Google Scholar
5. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174–177.Google Scholar
6. Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M., and Walker, R. H. 1985. Weed management in minimum-tillage peanut (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by cultivar, row spacing, and herbicides. Weed Sci. 33:233–237.Google Scholar
7. Colvin, D. L., Brecke, B. J., and Currey, W. L. 1986. Weed control and economic evaluation of full-season double cropped, conventional and minimum tillage peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:55.Google Scholar
8. Colvin, D. L. and Brecke, B. J. 1988. Peanut cultivar response to tillage systems. Peanut Sci. 15:21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Colvin, D. L., Brecke, B. J., and Whitty, E. B. 1988. Tillage variables for peanut production. Peanut Sci. 15:94–97.Google Scholar
10. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed Survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–420.Google Scholar
11. Fink, R. J. and Wesley, D. 1974. Corn yield as affected by fertilization and tillage system. Agron. J. 66:70–71.Google Scholar
12. Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1986. Postemergence grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 34:587–590.Google Scholar
13. Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1987. Comparison of no-tillage, minimum, and full-tillage cultural practices on peanuts. Peanut Sci. 14:101–103.Google Scholar
14. Grichar, W. J. and Smith, O. D. 1989. Effects of tillage practices and runner cultivars on peanut production. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 21:43.Google Scholar
15. Grichar, W. J. 1991. Control of Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and southern crabgrass (Digitaria ciliaris) in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with postemergence herbicides. Peanut Sci. 18:6–9.Google Scholar
16. Grichar, W. J. and Smith, O. D. 1991. Effects of tillage systems on southern blight and pod yields of five runner peanut genotypes. Peanut Sci. 18:144–147.Google Scholar
17. Grichar, W. J. and Smith, O. D. 1992. Interaction of tillage and cultivars in peanut production systems. Peanut Sci. 19:95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Harold, L. L., Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Edwards, W. M. 1970. No-tillage corn—characteristics of the system. Agric. Eng. 51:128–131.Google Scholar
19. Henning, R. J., Allison, A. H., and Tripp, L. D. 1982. Cultural practices. In Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., eds. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Inc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
20. Kapusta, G. and Strieker, C. F. 1976. Herbicidal weed control in stubble no-till planted corn. Weed Sci. 24:605–611.Google Scholar
21. Melville, D. R. and Rabb, J. L. 1976–1977. Studies with no-till soybean production. Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn. Louisiana Agric. 20(2): 16 p.Google Scholar
22. Musick, J. T., Weise, A. F., and Allen, R. R. 1975. Limited and no-tillage systems for bed-furrow irrigated soil. Paper No. 75-2538. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
23. Nelson, L. R., Gallaher, R. N., Bruce, R. R., and Holmes, M. R. 1977. Production of corn and sorghum grain in double cropping systems. Agron. J. 69:41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Robertson, W. K., Lundy, H. W., Prine, G. M., and Currey, W. L. 1976. Planting of corn in sod and small grain residues with minimum tillage. Agron. J. 68:271–274.Google Scholar
25. Sanford, J. O., Myhre, D. L., and Merivine, N. C. 1973. Double cropping systems involving no-tillage and conventional tillage. Agron. J. 65:978–982.Google Scholar
26. Swann, C. W. and Wilcut, J. W. 1989. Bentazon and paraquat tank mixtures for lambsquarters control in peanuts. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 19:58.Google Scholar
27. Triplett, G. B. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.Google Scholar
28. Unger, P. W., Weise, A. F., and Allen, R. R. 1977. Conservation tillage in the Southern Plains. J. Soil Water Conserv. 32:43–48.Google Scholar
29. Wehtje, G., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308–311.Google Scholar
30. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Colvin, D. L., and Patterson, M. G. 1987. Economic assessment of herbicide systems for minimum-tillage peanuts. Peanut Sci. 14:83–86.Google Scholar
31. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.Google Scholar
32. Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., and Hagwood, H. B. 1990. Lactofen systems for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 4:819–823.Google Scholar
33. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., and Hicks, T. V. 1990. Evaluation of herbicide systems in minimum- and conventional-tillage peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 38:243–248.Google Scholar
34. Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Economic yield response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:416–420.Google Scholar