Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:21:08.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flax (Linum usitatissimum) Response to Thifensulfuron Mixtures with Sethoxydim Plus Broadleaf Weed Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas A. Derksen  and
David A. Wall
Douglas A. Derksen
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Box 1000A, RR #3, Brandon, MB, Canada, R7A 5Y3
David A. Wall
Affiliation:
Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Box 1000A, RR #3, Brandon, MB, Canada, R7A 5Y3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recently, roundleaved mallow, redroot pigweed, and annual smartweed species have become problems for flax producers in the Canadian prairies. The use of thifensulfuron to enhance weed control with commonly used herbicide mixtures was tested at Indian Head, SK and Morden, MB. Visible crop injury and reduced height, yield, and quality occurred at rates as low as 0.5–1.0 g/ha. Improved control of broadleaf weeds was not consistent and antagonism of grassy weed control with sethoxydim occurred.

Keywords

Sethoxydim, 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onethifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidannual smartweed species, Polygonum sp. # POLXXredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREroundleaved mallow, Malva pusilla Sm. # MALPUflax, Linum usitatissimum L.BromoxynilMCPASetaria viridisAvena fatuaAMAREAVEFAMALPOPOLXXSETVI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 795 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oat in flax. Weed Sci. 16:501–504.Google Scholar
2. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349–359.Google Scholar
3. Dorrell, D. G. 1973. Effects of unusual field weathering on the quality of flax seed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:907–910.Google Scholar
4. Edmond, R. M. Jr. and York, A.C. 1987. Effects of rainfall and temperature on postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025. Weed Sci. 35:231–236.Google Scholar
5. Friesen, G. H. 1988. Weed control in flax. Expert Committee on Weeds: Research Report. Western Canada Section Meeting. November 29, 30 and Dec. 1. 1988, Winnipeg, MB. p. 162.Google Scholar
6. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. 1. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.Google Scholar
7. Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1990. Improving the efficiency of sethoxydim in flax. Weed Technol. 4:749–753.Google Scholar
8. Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1991. Residual effects of CGA-131036 and chlorsulfuron on spring-sown rotational crops. Weed Sci. 39:280–283.Google Scholar
9. Friesen, L., Morrison, I. N., Marshall, G., and Rother, W. 1990. Effects of volunteer wheat and barley on the growth and yield of flax. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Friesen, L. F., Nickel, K. P., and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Round-leaved mallow (Malva pusilla) growth and interference in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) and flax (Linum usitatissimum). Weed Sci. 40:448–454.Google Scholar
11. James, T. K. and Rahman, A. 1992. Effect of simulated rainfall and adjuvants on phytotoxicity of sulfonylurea herbicides. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Congr., Melbourne, Australia. Feb. 17–21. 2:229–232.Google Scholar
12. Kneeshaw, P. G. 1981. Differential flax cultivar tolerance to registered herbicide treatments. , Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.Google Scholar
13. McSheffrey, S.A., McHughen, A., and Devine, M. D. 1992. Characterization of transgenic sulfonylurea-resistant flax (Linum usitatissimum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 84:480–486.Google Scholar
14. Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:317–321.Google Scholar
15. O'Donovan, J. T. and Sharma, M. P. 1983. Wild oats, competition, and crop losses. Proc. Wild Oat Symp. Canadian Plains Research Centre, Univ. of Regina, Regina, SK. p. 27–42.Google Scholar
16. Reed, J. P., Hall, F. R., and Rick, S. K. 1992. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the performance of thifensulfuron with various surfactants. p. 255–260 in Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
17. Robertson, J. A. and Morrison, W. H. III. 1979. Analysis of oil content of sunflower seed by wide-line NMR. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 56:961–964.Google Scholar
18. Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food. 1995. Varieties of grain crops. Regina, SK. 24 p.Google Scholar
19. University of Saskatchewan. Guide to Farm Practice in Saskatchewan. 1987. The University of Saskatchewan Division of Extension and Community Relations. Saskatoon, SK. 240 p.Google Scholar
20. Zhao, C. C., Teasdale, J. R., and Coffman, C. B. 1990. Factors affecting the activity of thifensulfuron. Weed Sci. 38:553–557.Google Scholar