Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:26:01.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field bindweed control with quinclorac in highbush blueberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2022

Marcelo L. Moretti Open the ORCID record for Marcelo L. Moretti [Opens in a new window]  and
R. Edward Peachey
Marcelo L. Moretti*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR, USA
R. Edward Peachey
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Oregon State University, Department of Horticulture, Corvallis, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Marcelo L Moretti, Assistant Professor, Oregon State University, 4017 Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2750 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field bindweed is a perennial vining weed with vigorous growth, and is commonly found in highbush blueberry fields of Oregon. It requires and integrated strategy using multiple applications of postemergence herbicides and hand weeding for adequate control. Quinclorac is a herbicide that has been shown to control field bindweed, but no information is available indicating the tolerance of blueberry to quinclorac. The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of blueberry to quinclorac and to evaluate field bindweed control with quinclorac in different mixtures. Three groups of field studies were designed to assess 1) single application control of field bindweed, 2) use of sequential treatments to control field bindweed, and 3) long-term impact of quinclorac on field bindweed. In the single application control studies, a single application of quinclorac at 210 or 420 g ai ha−1 alone or in a mixture with rimsulfuron (35 g ai ha−1) or carfentrazone (35 g ai ha−1), controlled field bindweed by 69% to 76% while reducing its biomass between 22% and 44% compared to the nontreated control (61 g m−2). In a sequential treatment study, a single application of quinclorac (420 g ai ha−1) provided 83% to 100% control of field bindweed, outperforming three sequential applications of carfentrazone. In the long-term study, a single application of quinclorac reduced field bindweed biomass by 50% to 82% in 2019 and 62% to 87% in 2020. These results indicate that quinclorac can be safely applied to highbush blueberry plants. Early spring applications of quinclorac to field bindweed will reduce or eliminate the need for subsequent applications later in the season.

Keywords

quincloraccarfentrazonemesotrionerimsulfuronglufosinatefield bindweedConvolvulus arvensis L.highbush blueberryVaccinium corymbosum L.perennial weedpostemergenceblueberry toleranceherbicide efficacy
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 197 - 201
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph

References

Anonymous (2020) Qunistar® herbicide product label. Albaugh publication No. AD122320. Ankeny, IA: Albaugh, LLC. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Brooks, ME, Kristensen, K, van Benthem, KJ, Magnusson, A, Berg, CW, Nielsen, A, Skaug, HJ, Machler, M, Bolker, BM (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9:378–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryla, DR, Gartung, JL, Strik, BC (2011) Evaluation of irrigation methods for highbush blueberry—I. Growth and water requirements of young plants. HortScience 46:95–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryla, DR, Strik, BC (2007) Effects of cultivar and plant spacing on the seasonal water requirements of highbush blueberry. J Am Soc Hort Sci 132:270–277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, DD, Burnside, OC (1987) Effects of application variables on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol 1:14–17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancesco, J, Murray, K (2011) Pest management strategic plan for blueberries in Oregon and Washington: 2011 Revision. https://ipmdata.ipmcenters.org/documents/pmsps/ORWABlueberry.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2021Google Scholar
Enloe, SF, Nissen, SJ, Westra, P (1999a) Absorption, fate, and soil activity of quinclorac in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci 47:136–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, SF, Westra, P, Nissen, SJ, Miller, SD, Stahlman, PW (1999b) Use of quinclorac plus 2,4-D for controlling field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) in fallow. Weed Technol 13:731–736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, JA, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG, Schutte, B, Wu, C, Chatham, LA, Davis, AS (2016) Managing the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 72:74–80 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, K (1998) Quinclorac belongs to a new class of highly selective auxin herbicides. Weed Sci 46:707–716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, E (2009) Response of highbush blueberries to postemergent herbicides. Pages 425–429 in Proceedings IX International Vaccinium Symposium. Corvallis, OR: International Society of Horticultural Sciences Google Scholar
Kniss, A, Streibig, J (2020) Statistical analysis of agricultural experiments using R. https://rstats4ag.org/. Accessed: January 20, 2021Google Scholar
Lenth, R (2019) Emmeans package: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.3. 5.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html. Accessed: July 9, 2021Google Scholar
Mitich, LW (1991) Field bindweed. Weed Technol 5:913–915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bangarwa, SK, Scott, RC, Still, J, Griffith, GM (2010) Use of propanil and quinclorac tank mixtures for broadleaf weed control on rice (Oryza sativa) levees. Crop Prot 29:255–259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RStudio Team (2021) RStudio: Integrated Development R. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com. Accessed: January 20, 2021Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Quinclorac. Pages 399–400 in Shaner, DL, ed. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Šidák, Z (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 62:626–633 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Hanson, BD (2015) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control in early and late-planted processing tomatoes. Weed Technol 30:708–716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Hanson, BD, Steckel, LE (2020) Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis): “all tied up”. Weed Technol 34:916–921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strik, BC (2007) Horticultural practices of growing highbush blueberries in the ever-expanding US and global scene. J Amer Pomolog Soc 61:148 Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] United States Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2021) Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2020 Summary. Washington, DC: USDA Google Scholar
Weaver, SE, Riley, WR (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds: 53. Convolvulus arvensis L. Can J Plant Sci 62:461–472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremohazabieh, S, Ghadiri, H (2011) Effects of rimsulfuron, foramsulfuron and conventional herbicides on weed control and maize yield at three planting dates. J Biol Environ Sci 5:47–56 Google Scholar