Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T01:19:47.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting Chloroacetanilide Injury to Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Loston Rowe
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the effects of herbicide, herbicide rate, genetic variability, and soil moisture content on the tolerance of corn seedlings to two chloroacetanilide herbicides. Alachlor and metolachlor were applied preemergence at 2.2, 3.4, 4.5, and 6.7 kg ha-1 to 10 Great Lakes corn hybrids. Metolachlor appeared to be less injurious at the low rate and more injurious at the high rate than alachlor. Injury among the 10 hybrids tested varied significantly. Some of the hybrids appeared to tolerate alachlor more, while others tolerated metolachlor more indicating that even in a limited number of hybrids there was a spectrum of response. Six levels ranging from 8% to 22% soil moisture were evaluated for their effect on alachlor and metolachlor injury to corn seedlings. The herbicide injury ranged from no injury at the lowest soil moisture level to about 70% at the highest soil moisture level with 4.5 kg ha-1 application rate of alachlor or metolachlor.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Breaux, E. J. 1987. Initial metabolism of acetochlor and susceptible seedlings. Weed Sci. 35:463468.Google Scholar
2. Breaux, E. J., Patanella, J. E., and Sanders, E. F. 1987. Chloroacetanilide herbicide selectivity: Analysis of glutathione and homoglutathione in tolerant, susceptible, and safened seedlings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 35:474478.Google Scholar
3. Christy, A. L., Wideman, A. S., and McLaren, J. S. 1985. Canopy photosynthesis as a possible indicator of herbicide stress in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:106.Google Scholar
4. Francis, T. R., and Hamill, A. S. 1980. Inheritance of maize seedling tolerance to alachlor. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:10451047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Grover, R. 1970. Influence of soil-moisture content on the bioactivity of picloram. Weed Sci. 18:110111.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G., Doersch, R. E., and Albright, J. W. 1985. Twelve year comparison of alachlor and metolachlor. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:51.Google Scholar
7. Narsaiah, D. B., and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Differential responses of corn inbreds and hybrids to alachlor. Crop Sci. 17:657659.Google Scholar
8. Niccum, C. E. 1970. Variations in inbred and varietal tolerance of corn to butylate, alachlor, and propachlor. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 25:3335.Google Scholar
9. O'Connell, K. M., Breaux, E. J., and Fraley, R. T. 1988. Different rates of metabolism of two chloroacetanilide herbicides in Pioneer 3320 corn. Plant Physiol. 86:359363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Viger, P. R., and Eberlein, C. V. 1986. Corn tolerance to acetanilide herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:7.Google Scholar