Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:04:40.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Rimsulfuron and Metribuzin in Potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Ackley ,
Henry P. Wilson  and
Thomas E. Hines
John A. Ackley
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agric. Res. and Ext. Ctr., Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Painter, VA 23420
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1992 and 1993, rimsulfuron alone at 17, 35, and 70 g ai/ha, and at 35 g/ha plus metribuzin at 280 g ai/ha, respectively, was evaluated PRE and POST for weed control in potato. Rimsulfuron at 35 g/ha PRE and POST controlled common lambsquarters and giant foxtail and when combined with 280 g/ha metribuzin, controlled common ragweed and jimsonweed. Rimsulfuron and rimsulfuron with metribuzin caused slight to moderate chlorosis in new terminal growth of potato but chlorosis disappeared within 3 wk. Potato height, tuber yields, and tuber quality were not affected by rimsulfuron alone or with metribuzin.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onerimsulfuron, N-[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinal)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamidecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. ♯3CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. ♯ AMBELgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFAjimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. ♯ DATSTpotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Superior.’PostemergencepreemergencemetribuzinAmbrosia artemisiifoliaChenopodium albumDatura stramoniumSetaria faberiAMBELCHEALDATSTSETFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 475 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1991. DPX-E9636. Experimental herbicide for potatoes. Tech. Bull. E. I. duPont de Nemours. Agrie. Prod. Dep. Wilmington, DE 19898. 6 p.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1991. United States standards for grades of potatoes. FR Doe. 91-4381. 7 p.Google Scholar
3. Beste, C. E., Donohoe, J. P., and Dinkel, D. A. 1994. Postemergence DPX-E9636 for potatoes and residual soil effects. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:105.Google Scholar
4. Cranshaw, W. S. and Thornton, M. K. 1988. Effects of systemic insecticides on potato growth and their interaction with metribuzin. Am. Potato J. 65:535–541.Google Scholar
5. Dallyn, S. L. 1971. Weed control methods in potatoes. Am. Potato J. 48:116–128.Google Scholar
6. Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428–435.Google Scholar
7. Flint, J. L., and Witt, W. W. 1988. Soil temperature and moisture effects on imazaquin and imazethapyr degradation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:338.Google Scholar
8. Freisen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1986. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 32:442–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., Callihan, R. H., and Dwelle, R. B. 1985. Metribuzin absorption, translocation, and distribution in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Sci. 33:629–634.Google Scholar
10. Gorski, S. F. and Przepiorkowski, T. 1994. Potato varietal tolerance to E9636 applied pre- and post-emergence. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:95.Google Scholar
11. Green, J. M. and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactant structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7:633–640.Google Scholar
12. Grichar, W. J., Nester, P. R., and Colburn, A. E. 1992. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:396–400.Google Scholar
13. Hatterman-Valenti, H., Lawson, V. F., and Owen, M.D.K. 1994. Interaction of metribuzin and phorate on ‘Atlantic’ and ‘Norchip’ potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars. Weed Technol. 8:461–464.Google Scholar
14. Henne, R. C. 1975. Potato variety response to metribuzin. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:300–303.Google Scholar
15. Kee, E. and Wooten, T. 1994. Varietal sensitivity of potatoes to E9636 and metribuzin. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:116.Google Scholar
16. Leep, D. C., Green, J. M., and Kral, W. C. 1991. DPX-E9636: a new herbicide for potatoes. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 31:10.Google Scholar
17. Majek, B. 1988. Imazethapyr as a broadleaf herbicide for edible legume crops. Abst. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 28:23.Google Scholar
18. Palm, H. L., Liang, P. H., Fuesler, T. P., Leek, G. L., Strachan, S. D., Wittenbach, V. A., and Swinchatt, M. L. 1989. New low rate sulfonylureas for post-emergence weed control in corn. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 1:23–27.Google Scholar
19. Porter, G. A. and Sisson, J. A. 1994. Differential tolerance of potato varieties to postemergence DPX-E9636 and metribuzin. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:107.Google Scholar
20. Reinke, H., Rosenzweig, A., Claus, J., Kreidi, M., Chisholm, C., and Jensen, P. 1991. DPX-E9636, experimental sulfonylurea herbicide for potatoes. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 4:445–451.Google Scholar
21. Richburg, J. S. III., Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. Toxicity of imazethapyr to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Technol. 7:900–905.Google Scholar
22. Sieczka, J. B. and Creighton, J. F. 1994. The effect of E9636 on weed control and potato yield. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:109–113.Google Scholar
23. Sisson, J. A. and Porter, G. A. 1994. Ground-crack and postemergence DPX-E9636 applications for weed control in potatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:108.Google Scholar
24. Smith, O. 1977. Potatoes: Production, Storing, and Processing. 2nd ed. AVI Publishing Co. Inc., Westport, CT. p. 606–619.Google Scholar
25. Vencill, W. K., Wilson, H. P., Mines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and rotational crop response to imazethapyr in pea (Pisum sativum) and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 4:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wallace, R. W. and Bellinder, R. A. 1993. Crop injury and weed control with DPX-E9636 in potatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:113.Google Scholar
27. Wilson, H. P., Waterfield, R. L., and Savage, C. P. 1970. Field investigations of the activities of several herbicides for control of yellow nutsedge. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:255–262.Google Scholar
28. Wilson, H. P. and Hines, T. E. 1992. Weed Science Research Summary. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Res. Rep. 192:104–109.Google Scholar
29. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 239–241.Google Scholar