Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:36:41.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Chlorimuron/Linuron Combinations on Soybean (Glycine max) Growth and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Prostko ,
Brad A. Majek  and
Joseph Ingerson-Mahar
Eric P. Prostko
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Mt. Holly, NJ 08060
Brad A. Majek
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Bridgeton. NJ 08302
Joseph Ingerson-Mahar
Affiliation:
Rutgers Coop. Ext., Vineland, NJ 08360
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of chlorimuron + linuron combinations on soybean growth and yield. PRE applications of chlorimuron + linuron were applied at rates of 0.03 + 0.31, 0.04 + 0.50, 0.05 + 0.62, and 0.10 + 1.24 kg ai/ha. Soybean emergence was not reduced by any herbicide rate. Plant heights were significantly reduced by all rates 5 WAT but the plants recovered from this injury by 19 WAT. Pod production and yield were not reduced by chlorimuron + linuron combinations.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]-sulfonyl]benzoic acidlinuron, N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureasoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Premixprepackage
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 519 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference, 10th ed. 1994. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
2. Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459–462.Google Scholar
3. Gunsolus, J. L. and Curran, W. S. 1991. Herbicide modes of action and injury symptoms. North Cent. Reg. Ext. Pub. # 377. p. 10–11.Google Scholar
4. Holowid, J. R., Jeffrey, L. S., and McCutchen, T. C. 1977. Influence of soil types on soybean response to chlorbromuron, linuron, and metribuzin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 30:51.Google Scholar
5. Knake, E. L. 1987. How to get top value for your premix dollar. Agric. Consultant. March, p. 18–20.Google Scholar
6. Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to chlorimuron and imazaquin with varying herbicide hydroponic solution pH. Weed Technol. 6:382–388.Google Scholar
7. Newsom, L. J. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Soybean (Glycine max) response to chlorimuron and imazaquin as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Technol. 6:389–395.Google Scholar
8. Pomeranke, G. J. and Nickel, C. D. 1988. Inheritance of chlorimuron ethyl sensitivity in the soybean strains BSR 101 and M74-462. Crop Sci. 28:59–60.Google Scholar
9. Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Disadvantages of mechanical herbicide incorporation. p. 130 in Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A., Applied Weed Science. MacMillan Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
10. Tripp, T. N. and Baldwin, F. L. 1988. Effect of excessive precipitation on soybean injury from imazaquin and chlorimuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:15.Google Scholar