Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:21:32.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of Herbicide Programs and Cultivation for Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Control in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Abstract

Sicklepod control mid-season in cultivated soybean was higher when imazaquin plus AC 263,222 or AC 263,222 alone was applied POST following pendimethalin plus imazaquin PPI compared with only the PPI treatment. Pendimethalin plus imazaquin PPI followed by imazaquin plus AC 263,222 at 36 + 18 g ai/ha or followed by AC 263,222 at 18 g ai/ha with cultivation controlled sicklepod equal to pendimethalin PPI followed by imazaquin plus AC 263,222 at 71 + 18 g ai/ha or followed by a sequential application of AC 263,222 at 13 g ai/ha early POST followed by 9 g ai/ha late POST. Control with these treatments was no higher than for the standard of pendimethalin plus metribuzin PPI followed by chlorimuron POST at 9 g ai/ha, which controlled 86% sicklepod. Averaged across herbicide treatments, cultivation reduced percent sicklepod seed in harvested soybean samples 33% and increased soybean yield 19% compared with no cultivation. Soybean yield was highest for the chlorimuron standard and greater than that for the other treatments when averaged across cultivation treatments.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576579.Google Scholar
2. Creel, J. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Currey, W. L., Teem, D. H., and Jordan, J. H. 1981. Sicklepod competition and control programs in Florida soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:66.Google Scholar
4. Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed survey of the southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:137158.Google Scholar
5. English, L. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1980. Sicklepod and hemp sesbania control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:40.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. D. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop. Sci. 11:2526.Google Scholar
7. Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Bruff, S. A. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 7:331336.Google Scholar
8. Hauser, E. W., Buchanan, G. A., Nichols, A. L., and Patterson, R. M. 1982. Effects of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Sci. 30:602604.Google Scholar
9. Hollifield, B., Murdock, E. C., Stapleton, G. S., and Toler, J. E. 1992. Single and sequential herbicide programs for control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:326.Google Scholar
10. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Baughman, T. A. 1993. Influence of cultivation and management strategies on weed control in soybean with Cadre. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:53.Google Scholar
11. Norris, B. E. Jr. and Walker, R. H. 1989. Sequential postemergence chlorimuron and imazaquin application for sicklepod control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:92.Google Scholar
12. Oliver, L. R., Lambert, W. M., and James, A. R. 1974. Sicklepod control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:89.Google Scholar
13. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:187190.Google Scholar
14. Schrader, J. W. and Haskins, W. F. 1974. Multiple herbicide applications plus cultivation for sicklepod control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:90.Google Scholar
15. Sherman, M. E., Thompson, L. Jr., and Bunn, T. M. 1981. Sicklepod management in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:62.Google Scholar
16. Sims, B. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1990. Mutual influences of seedling johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia), and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:139147.Google Scholar
17. Smith, C. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1987. Mechanical vs. chemical control of sicklepod in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:28.Google Scholar
18. Smith, C. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Influence of cultivation timing on chemical control of sicklepod in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:35.Google Scholar
19. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:6871.Google Scholar
20. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar
21. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1990. Development of AC 263,222 as a postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:46.Google Scholar