Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:10:35.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Control Systems for Coffee Senna (Cassia occidentalis) in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Andrew Keeton ,
Edward C. Murdock ,
Gregory S. Stapleton  and
Joe E. Toler
Andrew Keeton
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Edward C. Murdock
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Gregory S. Stapleton
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Joe E. Toler
Affiliation:
Dep. Exp. Stat., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were established to evaluate coffee senna control in cotton with registered PRE, early POST-directed (EPD), and late POST-directed (LPD) herbicides and with pyrithiobac applied PRE and early POST. Fluometuron and norflurazon applied PRE controlled coffee senna 87 and 65%, respectively, 6 wk after planting (WAP). Methazole applied EPD controlled coffee senna 96% 2 wk after application, whereas fluometuron and MSMA applied EPD controlled 70 and 16%, respectively. LPD applications of cyanazine, diuron, and prometryn averaged only 45% control 8 WAP. MSMA applied LPD controlled coffee senna only 12%. Fluometuron and norflurazon applied PRE followed by methazole applied EPD and cyanazine applied LPD controlled coffee senna 98 and 99% 6 WAP, respectively. PRE, early POST, and PRE followed by early POST applications of pyrithiobac controlled coffee senna 88, 89, and 95% 6 WAP, respectively. Seed cotton yields were similar to weed-free cotton with all treatments except MSMA applied EPD and the LPD treatments, all of which provided unacceptable (12 to 49%) control 8 WAP.

Keywords

Cyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrilediuron, N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylureafluometuron, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ureamethazole, 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5-dioneMSMA, monosodium salt of methylarsonic acidnorflurazon, 4-chloro-5-(methylamino)-2-(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinoneprometryn, N,N-bis(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminepyrithiobac, 2-chloro-6-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)thio] benzoic acidtrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminecoffee senna, Cassia occidentalis L. ♯3CASOCcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala 90,’ ‘Deltapine 5313.’Sequential treatmentscyanazinediuronfluometuronmethazoleMSMAnorflurazonprometrynpyrithiobactrifluralin
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 550 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Boyette, C. D. 1988. Biocontrol of three leguminous weed species with Alternaria cassiae . Weed Technol. 2:414–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Crowley, R. H., Teem, D. H., Buchanan, G. A., and Hoveland, C. S. 1979. Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Cassia spp. to preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 27:531–535.Google Scholar
3. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states, broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–396.Google Scholar
4. Elmore, C. D. 1983. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:149.Google Scholar
5. Guthrie, D. S. and York, A. C. 1989. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield following fluometuron postemergence applied. Weed Technol. 3:501–504.Google Scholar
6. Higgins, J. M., Walker, R. H., and Whitwell, T. 1985. Coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 34:52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:159–162.Google Scholar
8. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Total postemergence herbicide programs in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with sethoxydim and DPX-PE350. Weed Technol. 7:196–201.Google Scholar
9. Keeling, J. W. and Abernathy, J. R. 1989. Preemergence weed control in a conservation-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cropping system on sandy soils. Weed Technol. 3:182–185.Google Scholar
10. Keeling, J. W., Henniger, C. G., and Abernathy, J. R. 1993. Effects of DPX-PE350 on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growth, yield, and fiber quality. Weed Technol. 7:930–933.Google Scholar
11. Murdock, E. C. 1995. Cotton weed control. p. 87–89 in Horton, P. M., ed. Agricultural Chemicals Handbook. Clemson Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Clemson, SC.Google Scholar
12. Snipes, C. E. and Byrd, J. D. Jr., 1994. The influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42:210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Sunderland, S. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Differential tolerance of morningglory species (Ipomoea sp.) to DPX-PE350. Weed Sci. 42:227–232.Google Scholar
14. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar