Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:52:53.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbamothioate and Chloroacetamide Herbicides for Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph F. Schuh
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to compare herbicides applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preplant incorporated/preemergence (PPI/PRE), and preplant incorporated/early postemergence (PPI/early POST) to control woolly cupgrass in corn. Although good early-season control of woolly cupgrass from PPI cycloate plus cyanazine, EPTC plus dietholate or SC-0058, and butylate plus cyanazine sometimes was observed, middle- and/or late-season control was often limited. Generally, better woolly cupgrass control and higher corn yields were obtained from split PPI/PRE applications rather than from single PPI applications of alachlor, metolachlor, and acetochlor. The highest and most consistent full-season woolly cupgrass control resulted when cycloate or EPTC plus dietholate applied PPI was followed by cyanazine plus either pendimethalin, alachlor, metolachlor, or acetochlor applied early POST. However, in 1989 adverse weather conditions near the early POST application timing injured corn and reduced yields.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Doersch, R. E., and Doll, J. D. 1985. Handling wild proso millet, woolly cupgrass, and wirestem muhly. Proc. Fert., Aglime and Pest Manage. Conf. 24:278280.Google Scholar
2. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Susceptibility of seven annual grasses to herbicides. Weed Res. 14:5155.Google Scholar
3. Harvey, R. G. 1987. Herbicide dissipation from soils with different use histories. Weed Sci. 35:383389.Google Scholar
4. Harvey, R. G. 1990. Biodegradation of butylate, EPTC, and extenders in previously treated soils. Weed Sci. 38:237242.Google Scholar
5. Harvey, R. G., McNevin, G. R., Albright, J. W., and Kozak, M. E. 1986. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control with thiocarbamate herbicides on previously treated soils. Weed Sci. 34:773780.Google Scholar
6. Harvey, R. G., Dekker, J. H., Fawcett, R. S., Roeth, F. W., and Wilson, R. G. 1987. Enhanced biodegradation of herbicides in soil and effects on weed control. Weed Technol. 1:341349.Google Scholar
7. Holmes, J., and Owen, M. D. 1984. Woolly cupgrass control in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:107108.Google Scholar
8. Schuh, J. F., and Harvey, R. G. 1989. Woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in corn (Zea mays) with pendimethalin/triazine combinations and cultivation. Weed Sci. 37:405411.Google Scholar
9. Schuh, J. F., Harvey, R. G., and Doersch, R. E. 1988. Woolly cupgrass control in corn and soybeans. Proc. Fert., Aglime and Pest Manage. Conf. 27:272274.Google Scholar
10. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
11. Strand, O. E., and Miller, G. R. 1980. Woolly cupgrass – A new weed threat in the Midwest. Weeds Today. Fall 1980, p. 16.Google Scholar
12. Weeds of the North Central States. 1981. North Cent. Regional Res. Publ. No. 281, p. 26.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, R. G., and Rodebush, J. E. 1987. Degradation of dichlormid and dietholate in soils with prior EPTC, butylate, dichlormid, and dietholate exposure. Weed Sci. 35:289294.Google Scholar