Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T16:09:12.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spring-Planted Winter Rye (Secale cereale) as a Living Mulch to Control Weeds in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Comfort M. Ateh  and
Jerry D. Doll
Comfort M. Ateh
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron.; Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Jerry D. Doll
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron.; Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of rye planting time, rye seeding rate, and rye/weed management systems on weed control and soybean yield were determined in field experiments near Arlington, WI from 1992 to 1994. Insufficient precipitation in 1992 resulted in limited soil moisture, less ground cover, less weed control, and lower soybean yields than in 1993 and 1994. The higher rye seeding rate provided more ground cover and better weed control than the lower rate in all years; however, it reduced soybean vigor. The optimum rye seeding rate was 112 kg/ha. The rye-only system reduced weed shoot biomass by 90, 82, and 60%, in 1992, 1993, and 1994, respectively, relative to the no-rye weedy check treatment. Killing rye 45 d after planting soybean gave optimum weed control. In 1993, rye alone suppressed the weeds without decreasing crop yield, but in 1994 crop yield was decreased due to inadequate weed control by rye. The results indicate that the rye living mulch technique can adequately control weeds without causing soybean yield reduction if weed pressure is low, ground cover and soil moisture are adequate and rye interference is minimal.

Keywords

Rye, Secale cereale L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Alternative controlcover crop
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I. O., 1980. Live mulch: a new approach to weed control and crop production in the tropics. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 2:377–382.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, J. P., and Putnam, A. R. 1981. Weed suppression with rye cover crops in vegetable cropping systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:64.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, J. P., and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-till cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Benoit, R. E., Willits, N. A., and Hanna, W. J. 1962. Effect of rye winter cover crop on soil moisture. Agron. J. 54:419–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Blevins, R. L., Cook, D., Phillips, S. H., and Phillips, R. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. De Haan, R. L., Wyse, D. L., Ehlke, N. J., Maxwell, B. D., and Putnam, D. H. 1992. Simulation of spring-seeded smother plants for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Doll, J. D., and Bauer, T. 1991. Rye: A double-barreled weed management tool. Proc. 1991 Fertil., Aglime, and Pest Manage. Conf. 30:205–213.Google Scholar
8. Eadie, A. G., Swanton, C. J., Shaw, J. E., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. Integration of cereal crops in ridge-tillage corn (Zea mays) production. Weed Technol. 6:553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Echtenkamp, G. W., and Moomaw, R. S. 1989. No-till com production in a living mulch system. Weed Technol. 3:261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Elkins, D., Frederking, D., Marashi, R., and McVay, B. 1983. Living mulch for no-till corn and soybeans. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38:431–433.Google Scholar
11. Gressel, J., 1992. Addressing real weed science needs with innovations. Weed Technol. 6:509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Grubinger, V. P., and Minotti, P. L. 1990. Managing white clover living mulch for sweet corn production with partial rototilling. Am. J. Alternative Agric. 5:4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hall, J. K., Hartwig, N. L., and Hoffman, L. D. 1984. Cyanazine losses in runoff from no-tillage corn in “living” and dead mulches vs. unmulched, conventional tillage. J. Environ. Qual. 13:105–110.Google Scholar
14. Holt, J. S., and LeBaron, H. M. 1990. Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 4:141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Knake, E. L., Slife, F. E., and Seif, R. D. 1965. The effect of rotary hoeing on performance of preemerge herbicides. Weeds 13:72–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kurtz, T., Melsted, S. W., and Bray, R. H. 1957. The importance of nitrogen and water in reducing competition between intercrops and corn. Agron. J. 44:13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Laflen, J. M., Amemiya, M., and Hintz, E. A. 1981. Measuring crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36:341–343.Google Scholar
18. Leng, M. L., 1991. Consequences of reregistration on pesticides, p. 27–42 in Marco, G. J., Hollingworth, R. M., and Plimmer, J. R., eds. Regulation of Agrochemicals—A Driving Force in Their Evolution. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
19. Liebl, R., Simons, W. F., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1992. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:838–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Loughran, J. C., and Hartwig, N. L. 1987. Crownvetch as influenced by tillage in a corn-crownvetch living mulch system. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:7–12.Google Scholar
21. Mulder, T. A., and Doll, J. D. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Paine, L. K. and Harrison, H. 1993. The historical roots of living mulch and related practices. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 3:137–143.Google Scholar
23. Ritter, W. F., 1990. Pesticide contamination of groundwater in the United States—A review. J. Environ. Sci. Health 25:1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Robinson, R. G., and Dunham, R. S. 1954. Companion crops for weed control in soybeans. Agron. J. 46:278–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Samson, R. A., Bridger, G., Foulds, C. M., and Patriquin, D. 1989. Choice and management of cover crop species and varieties for use in row crop dominant rotations. Final Report 1990. Resource Efficient Agricultural Production (REAP)-Canada. Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Quebec.Google Scholar
26. Schuler, R. T., and Frank, G. G. 1991. Estimating agricultural field machinery costs. Univ. Wis. Ext. Publ. A3510.Google Scholar
27. Springman, R., Buhler, D., Shuler, R., Mueller, D., and Doll, J. 1989. Row crop cultivators for conservation systems. Univ. Wisc. Ext. Publ. A3483.Google Scholar
28. Tjepkema, J., 1991. Use of spring planted winter rye for weed control in soybeans. Midwest Rodale Network Project. Emmaus, PA.Google Scholar
29. Warnes, D. D., Ford, J. H., and Barrbour, N. W. 1993. Effect of management of winter rye cover crop on weed control and grain yield in soybeans and corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 48:25.Google Scholar
30. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection. 1993. Wisconsin 1993: Agricultural Statistics. Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics Service. Madison, WI.Google Scholar