Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:25:48.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Red Rice (Oryza sativa) and Echinochloa spp. Control in Texas Gulf Coast Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

José A. Noldin ,
James M. Chandler ,
Garry N. McCauley  and
John W. Sij JR.
José A. Noldin
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
Garry N. McCauley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Eagle Lake, TX 77434
John W. Sij JR.
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Chillicothe-Vernon, TX 77713-8550
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1992 to 1994 to evaluate herbicides applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), and postemergence (POST) for red rice and Echinochloa spp. control in soybean. Metolachlor PPI at 3.4 kg ai/ha controlled red rice late season 90 to 92%. Alachlor at 4.5 kg ai/ha and SAN 582H at 2.2 or 3.4 kg ai/ha, PPI or PRE, metolachlor plus imazaquin at 2.8 + 0.14 kg ai/ha PRE, and quizalofop-P POST at 0.07 kg ai/ha provided 83 to 95% red rice control in at least 2 of 3 yr. The addition of imazaquin to metolachlor or pendimethalin did not improve red rice control. Early-season Echinochloa spp. control with trifluralin, pendimethalin, and pendimethalin + imazaquin applied PPI; metolachlor, SAN 582H at 2.2 or 3.4 kg/ha, and metolachlor + imazaquin applied PPI or PRE; alachlor, AC 263,222 + imazaquin, and AC 263,222 + imazethapyr applied PRE; and sethoxydim and quizalofop-P applied POST was 90 to 100% in at least 2 of 3 yr. However, Echinochloa spp. control decreased for all treatments later in the season. Pendimethalin applied PPI at 2.2 kg ai/ha or in mixture with imazaquin at 1.7 + 0.14 kg ai/ha injured soybean 14 to 34% in 2 yr. Trifluralin PPI, SAN 582H at 2.2 or 3.4 kg/ha PPI or PRE, imazaquin PPI, metolachlor + imazaquin PPI or PRE, and AC 263,222 + imazethapyr injured soybean 12 to 41% in at least 1 of 3 yr.

Keywords

pendimethalin, N-(1-ethyl-propyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminetrifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGjunglerice, Echinochloa colona (L.) Link # ECHCOred rice, Oryza sativa L. # ORYSAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.AC 263,222alachlorclomazoneimazaquinimazethapyrmetolachlorpendimethalinquizalofop-PsethoxydimtrifluralinECHCGECHCOORYSAPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergenceWAP, weeks after plantingWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 677 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, J. B., Sonnier, E. A., and Shrefler, J. W. 1986. Integration of molinate use with water management for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 34:916–922.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. 1978, Red rice control in alternate crops. In Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice Research and Control. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. B-1270. pp. 16–18.Google Scholar
Barrentine, W. L., Street, J. E., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1984. Duration of red rice control with selected soybean herbicides. Mississippi Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Highlights 47(6): 2–4.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:392–399.Google Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 33:644–649.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern stales. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1994. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:279–299.Google Scholar
Dunand, R. T. 1988. Red Rice—Its Impact on Grain Quality and Its Cultural Control: A Review of Research in Louisiana, 1960–1982. Crowley, LA: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 792. 21 p.Google Scholar
Eastin, E. F. 1981. Weed management systems for U.S. rice. In Pimentel, D., ed. Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 539–547.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. J. and Ramirez, A. 1993. Red rice (Oryza sativa): competition studies for management decisions. Int. J. Pest Manage. 39:133–138.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Harger, T. R. 1986. Red rice (Oryza sativa) and junglerice (Echinochloa colonum) control in solid-seeded soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 34:582–586.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Harger, T. R. 1990. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control options in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:35–38.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Dunand, R. T., Baker, J. B., Regan, R. P., and Colin, M. A. 1991. Integrating red rice control measures in soybean–rice rotations. Louisiana Agric. 34(3): 6–7.Google Scholar
Guy, C. B., Beaty, J. D., Helms, R. S., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1992. Red rice control programs in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:65.Google Scholar
Harr, J., Seckinger, K., and Ummel, E. 1991. San 582 H—a new herbicide for weed control in corn and soybeans. In Proc. 1991 Br. Crop Prot. Conf., Weeds. pp. 87–92.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Black, H. L. 1987. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 35:127–129.Google Scholar
Klosterboer, A. D. 1978. Red rice control in Texas. In Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice Research and Control. College Station. TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. B-1270. pp. 35–37 Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1991a. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) densities in rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 39:169–174.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1991b. Interference durations of red rice (Oryza sativa) in rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 39:363–368.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989a. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf weed herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989b. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329–334.Google Scholar
Nastasi, P. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1989. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:389–392.Google Scholar
Osborne, B. T., Shaw, D. R., and Ratliff, R. L. 1995a. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar tolerance to SAN 582H and metolachlor as influenced by soil moisture. Weed Sci. 43:288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, B. T., Shaw, D. R., and Ratliff, R. L. 1995b. Response of selected soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to dimethenamid and metolachlor in hydroponic conditions. Weed Technol. 9:178–181.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. and Baker, J. B. 1979. Response of selected rice (Oryza sativa) lines to molinate. Weed Sci. 27:219–223.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th edition Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 846 p.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663–666.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol. 2:232–241.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1989. Cropping and herbicides systems for red rice (Oryza sativa) control. Weed Technol. 3:414–419.Google Scholar