Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:45:45.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of Imazethapyr-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) Compared with Susceptible Near-Isogenic and Commercial Hybrids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chris M. Boerboom  and
Joe G. Lauer
Chris M. Boerboom
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Joe G. Lauer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Farmers need information on herbicide technology and crop performance to assess the profitability of new herbicide-resistant crop technologies. First-generation imazethapyr-resistant corn hybrids evaluated at the University of Wisconsin yielded less than other commercial hybrids. To determine if this resistance trait affected yield or agronomic traits, 10 near-isogenic pairs of imazethapyr-resistant and -susceptible corn hybrids were compared. Whether treated with imazethapyr or not, imazethapyr-resistant hybrids yielded the same when averaged across hybrids, although yield varied among a few individual hybrids within single experiments. Seven of the imazethaypr-resistant hybrids yielded the same, two yield more, and one yielded less than their susceptible near-isogenic counterpart during eight site-years. Grain moisture was not affected, but imazethapyr-resistant hybrids had fewer broken stalks than did susceptible hybrids. The imazethapyr resistance trait does not appear to affect yield potential, but the backcrossing procedure may have caused early resistant hybrids to lag behind in yield compared to other new hybrids.

Keywords

Imazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L.Herbicide-resistant cropsherbicide-tolerant cropsimidazolinoneALS, acetolactate synthaseIR, imazethapyr-resistantIS, imazethapyr-susceptible
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 110 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bauman, T. T., Owen, M.D.K., and Liebl, R. A. 1992. Evaluation of Garst 8532IT corn for herbicide tolerance. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:15.Google Scholar
Currie, R. S., Kwon, C. S., and Penner, D. 1995. Magnititude of imazethapyr resistance of corn (Zea mays) hybrids with altered acetolactate synthase. Weed Sci. 43:578–582.Google Scholar
Currie, R. S., and Regehr, D. L. 1995. Methods of measuring the impact of the XA17 gene on imazethapyr injury in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 9:676–681.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. N., 1992. Concerns of seed company officials with herbicide-tolerant cultivars. Weed Technol. 6:640–646.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. N., 1996. Seed company perspectives. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 253–262.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A., and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley. 680 p.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. A., Rufener, G. K., Chang, M. T., and Koehler, P. H. 1993. Development of resistance to Pursuit herbide in corn—the IT gene. Report of the 48th Annual Corn and Sorghum Research Conference. 48:104–118.Google Scholar
Hallauer, A. R., Russell, W. A., and Lamkey, K. R. 1988. Corn breeding. In Sprague, G. F. and Dudley, J. W., eds. Corn and Corn Improvement. Volume 18, Agronomy. Madison. WI: American Society of Agronomy. pp. 463–564.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. W., Anthon, T. M., and Kutil, J. L. 1991. Wild-proso millet control in Pioneer imidazolinone resistant hybrid corn study. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 48:234–235.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. W., Anthon, T. M., and Kutil, J. L. 1992. Annual weed control in imidazolinone resistant and imidazolinone tolerant field corn study. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 49:166–167.Google Scholar
Hayenga, M., Thompson, L. C., Chase, C., and Kaaria, S. 1992. Economic and environmental implications of herbicide-tolerant corn and processing tomatoes. J. Soil Water Conserv. 47:411–417.Google Scholar
Hudelson, K. D., and Lauer, J. G. 1995. 1995 Wisconsin Hybrid Corn Performance Trials—Grain and Silage. University of Wisconsin Extension Publication A3653. 29 p.Google Scholar
Kells, J. J., and Dysinger, K. 1996. Yield potential of selected IMI corn hybrids. In Dysinger, K., Harpstead, D. D., Leep, R. H., Lempke, J., Allen, M., and Main, D., eds. Corn Hybrids Compared in the 1995 Season. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-431. p. 5.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C., and Eberlein, C. V. 1996. Possible pleiotropic effects in herbicide-resistant crops. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 201–210.Google Scholar
Maxwell, D. J., and Simmons, F. W. 1993. Evaluation of imazethapyr and other herbicides for preemergence weed control in imazethapyr resistant corn, Urbana, Illinois, 1993. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 50:202–203.Google Scholar
Mustajab, K., and Kapusta, G. 1991. Shattercane control in corn with postemergence applied imazethapyr combinations. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 48:199.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K., Singh, B., Shatter, D., and Stidham, M. 1991a. Mutations in corn (Zea mays L.) conferring resistance to imidazolinone herbicides. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:65–70.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. 1991b. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
Ott, L., 1984. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Boston, MA: Duxbury. 775 p.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L., Harvey, R. G., Albright, J. W., and Anthon, T. M. 1993. Woolly cupgrass control in field corn study. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 50:197–200.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Bascomb, N. F., and Smith, W. 1996. Imidazolinone-resistant crops: selection, characterization, and management. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 213–230.Google Scholar