Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:19:48.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interference and Control of Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and Southern Sandbur (Cenchrus echinatus) in Forage Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412
John S. Richburg III
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Soils and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5412

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at two locations in central Alabama to evaluate competitiveness of large crabgrass and southern sandbur with ‘Tifton 78’ hybrid bermudagrass as influenced by diuron application and sprigging rate. Large crabgrass was the more competitive species. In late season, bermudagrass ground cover with no weed competition was 96% compared with 72 and 81% where large crabgrass and southern sandbur, respectively, were present. Similarly, large crabgrass and southern sandbur reduced the proportion of bermudagrass in the cumulative harvested forage by at least 59 and 38%, respectively. Application of diuron preemergence (PRE) at 1.1 kg ai/ha was more effective than postemergence (POST) application, both in terms of weed control and bermudagrass safety. With diuron applied PRE, large crabgrass and southern sandbur reduced the proportion of bermudagrass in the harvested forage only 32 and 25%, respectively. Increasing bermudagrass sprigging rate was beneficial for weed control but of relatively minor importance compared with diuron PRE.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bingham, S. W. 1967. Influence of herbicides on root development of bermudagrass. Weeds 15:363365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, S. W. and Hall, J. R. III. 1985. Effect of herbicides on bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) sprig establishment. Weed Sci. 33:253257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, S. W. and Shaver, R. L. 1981. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control during bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) establishment. Weed Sci. 29:1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J. E. 1967. Influence of environmental factors on the efficacy of preemergence diuron applications. Weeds 15:317322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, G. W. and Hanna, W. W. 1995. Bermudagrass. In Barnes, R. F., Miller, D. A., and Nelson, C. J., eds. Forages. An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Volume 1. Ames: Iowa State University Press. pp. 421428.Google Scholar
Chenault, E. W. and Wiese, A. F. 1988. Tolerance of 13 range grasses to herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:115.Google Scholar
Cords, H. P. 1973. Weed and alfalfa hay quality. Weeds 21:400401.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1990. Weed survey—southern states. Research Report, Southern Weed Science Society. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:462488.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1973. Herbicides, sprigging rates, and nitrogen treatments for establishment of Tifway bermudagrass. Agron. J. 65:969972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, R. M., Sercy, V. S., and Dickens, R. 1965. Controlling weeds during Coastal bermuda establishment. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Highlights of Agric. Res. 12:1.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Martin, L. D. 1992. Crabgrass control in Coastal bermudagrass. Agron. J. 84:786788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sund, K. A. 1964. Evaluation of atrazine, simazine, monuron, and diuron on ten Hawaiian sugarcane plantations. Weeds 12:215219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winton, K. T. and Stritzke, J. F. 1982. Control of pigweed in established alfalfa. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:75.Google Scholar