Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:04:25.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Cultivar on Yield Loss from Cheat (Bromus secalinus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey A. Koscelny ,
Thomas F. Peeper ,
John B. Solie  and
Stanley G. Solomon Jr.
Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
John B. Solie
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Engr., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Stanley G. Solomon Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Engr., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Oklahoma to determine the effects of row spacing, cultivar, seeding rate, and water or ammonium polyphosphate fertilizer injection in the row at seeding, on the competitiveness of hard red winter wheat with cheat. Decreasing row spacing from 23 to 8 cm increased yield of weed-free wheat at two of three locations and cheat-infested wheat in six of ten experiments. Increasing seeding rate from 265 to 530 seeds m-2 increased wheat yield. Injecting water at 20 ml m-1 of row at seeding did not increase wheat emergence or yield. Cheat seed production was not consistently suppressed by any one cultivar. Juvenile growth habit was unrelated to wheat competitiveness.

Keywords

Cheat, Bromus secalinus L. ♯3 BROSEwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Winter wheatwater injection
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 487 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Auld, B. A., Kemp, D. R., and Medd, R. W. 1983. The influence of spatial arrangement on grain yield of wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34:99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Carter, H. W., Norton, H. W., and Dungan, G. H. 1957. Wheat and cheat. Agron. J. 49:261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Challaiah, R. E., Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Coleman, N. T., Thorup, J. T., and Jackson, W. A. 1960. Phosphate-sorption reactions that involve exchangeable Al. Soil Sci. 90:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dao, T. H. 1987. Crop residues and management of annual grass weeds in continuous no-till wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fenster, C. R., and McCalla, T. M. 1970. Tillage practices in western Nebraska with a wheat-fallow rotation. Nebr. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 507.Google Scholar
7. Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36:479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Frederick, J. R., and Marshall, H. G. 1985. Grain yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat as affected by management practices. Agron. J. 77:495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Greer, H.A.L. 1988. Economic losses due to weeds in Southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:405–410.Google Scholar
10. Greer, H., Peeper, T., and Fain, D. 1980. Cheat control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:314.Google Scholar
11. Holliday, R. 1960. Plant population and crop yield. Part I. Field Crop Abstr. 13:159–167.Google Scholar
12. Holliday, R. 1963. The effect of row width on the yields of cereals. Field Crop Abstr. 16:71–81.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, G., and Tucker, B. 1988. OSU soil test calibrations. OSU Ext. Facts No. 2225. Coop. Ext. Serv., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater. Google Scholar
14. Johnson, J. W., Hargrove, W. L., and Moss, R. B. 1988. Optimizing row spacing and seeding rate for soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 80:164–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Joseph, K.D.S.M., Alley, M. M., Brann, D. E., and Gravelle, W. D. 1985. Row spacing and seeding rate effects on yield and yield components of soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 77:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kemp, D. R., Auld, B. A., and Medd, R. W. 1983. Does optimizing plant arrangements reduce interference or improve the utilization of space? Agric. Systems 12:31–36.Google Scholar
17. Marshall, G. C., and Ohm, H. W. 1987. Yield responses of 16 winter wheat cultivars to row spacing and seeding rate. Agron. J. 79:1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Martin, M.P.L.D., and Field, R. J. 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28:111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Medd, R. W., Auld, B. A., Kemp, D. R., and Murison, R. D. 1985. The influence of wheat density and spatial arrangement on annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin, competition. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 36:361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Noori, F., Bolton, F. E., and Moss, D. N. 1985. Water injection at seeding of winter wheat. Agron. J. 77:906–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Ross, M. A., and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Roth, G. W., Marshall, H. G., Hatley, O. E., and Hill, R. R. 1984. Effect of management practices on grain yield, test weight, and lodging of soft red winter wheat. Agron. J. 76:379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Rydrych, D. J. 1974. Competition between winter wheat and downy brome. Weed Sci. 22:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Rydrych, D. J., and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Semmel, T. W. 1981. The quality of wheat in Oklahoma drill boxes. M. S thesis. Okla. State Univ., Stillwater. 74 pp.Google Scholar
26. Wicks, G. A. 1984. Integrated systems for control and management of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in cropland. Weed Sci. 32, Suppl. 1 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar