Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:15:28.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Tillage and Glyphosate on Control of Quackgrass (Elytrigia repens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kevin Chandler ,
Stephen D. Murphy  and
Clarence J. Swanton
Kevin Chandler
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Stephen D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Univ. Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted during two soybean-corn rotations to evaluate the effect of tillage systems on quackgrass growth and control with and without glyphosate. In the final year of the study, tillage alone (compared to no-till) resulted in 88%, 78%, 64%, and 31% control of quackgrass with fall moldboard plow, spring moldboard plow, fall soil-saver, and spring soil-saver tillage, respectively. When glyphosate was used to control quackgrass, crop yields increased as tillage was reduced and excellent control of quackgrass in no-till was achieved. Increased shoot growth (in moldboard plowed and fall soil-saver tillage plots), exposure of rhizomes in winter (in fall tilled plots), and increased depth of rhizome burial (in spring tilled plots) increased quackgrass control. In general, the total biomass of quackgrass was reduced in drier years. Nonetheless, drought increased crop yield losses caused by quackgrass interference.

Keywords

Quackgrass, Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski. # AGRREglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineWeed managementno-tillageglyphosaterow cropsrhizomesAGRRE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 450 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arny, A. C. 1932. Variation in the organic reserves in underground parts of perennial weeds from April to November. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 84. 28 p.Google Scholar
2. Bachtaler, G. 1974. The development of the weed flora after several years direct drilling in cereal rotations on different soils. Proc. 12th Br. Weed Control Conf. p. 1063–1071.Google Scholar
3. Baird, D. D. and Begeman, G. F. 1972. Postemergence characterization of a new quackgrass herbicide. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:100–106.Google Scholar
4. Baird, D. D., Brown, R. H., and Phatak, S. C. 1974. Influence of preemergence herbicides, nitrogen, sod density, and mowing on postemergence activity of glyphosate for quackgrass control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:76–86.Google Scholar
5. Baird, D. D., Phatak, S. C., Upchurch, R. P., and Begeman, G. F. 1973. Glyphosate activity on quackgrass as influenced by mowing and rhizome density. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:13–20.Google Scholar
6. Brockman, F. E., Duke, W. B., and Hunt, J. F. 1973. Agronomic factors influencing the effectiveness of glyphosate for quackgrass control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:21–29.Google Scholar
7. Cussans, G. W. 1975. Weed control in reduced cultivation and direct drilling systems. Outlook Agric. 8:240–242.Google Scholar
8. Dexter, S. T. 1942. Seasonal variations in drought resistance of exposed rhizomes of quackgrass. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:1125–1136.Google Scholar
9. Dunham, R. S., Buchholtz, K. P., Derscheid, L. A., Grisby, A. H., Helgerson, E. A., and Staniforth, D. W. 1956. Quackgrass control. Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 434. 31 p.Google Scholar
10. Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1993. Herbicide comparisons on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) within different crop competition and tillage conditions. Weed Sci. 41:94–99.Google Scholar
11. Ivany, J. A. 1975. Effects of glyphosate application at different growth stages on quackgrass control. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:861–863.Google Scholar
12. Ivany, J. A. 1981. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 29:382–386.Google Scholar
13. Lowe, H. J. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1951. Cultural methods for control of quackgrass. Weeds 1:346–351.Google Scholar
14. Majek, B. A., Erickson, C., and Duke, W. B. 1984. Tillage effects and environmental influences on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizome growth. Weed Sci. 32:376–381.Google Scholar
15. Merivani, Y. N. and Wyse, D. L. 1984. Effects of tillage and herbicides on quackgrass in a corn-soybean rotation. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:97–98.Google Scholar
16. Pollard, F. and Cussans, G. W. 1976. The influence of tillage on the weed flora of four sites sown to successive crops of spring barley. Proc. 13th Br. Weed Control Conf. p. 1019–1028.Google Scholar
17. Rioux, R., Bandeen, J. D., and Anderson, G. W. 1974. Effects of growth stage on translocation of glyphosate in quackgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:397–401.Google Scholar
18. Shieh, W.-J., Geiger, D. R., and Buczynski, S. R. 1993. Distribution of glyphosate in quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) rhizomes in relation to assimilate accumulation. Weed Sci. 41:7–11.Google Scholar
19. Shimming, W. K. and Messersmith, C. G. 1988. Freezing resistance of overwintering buds of four perennial weeds. Weed Sci. 36:568–573.Google Scholar
20. Sikkema, P. H. and Dekker, J. 1987. Use of infrared thermometry in determining critical stress periods induced by quackgrass (Agropyron repens) in soybeans (Glycine max) . Weed Sci. 35:784–791.Google Scholar
21. Stobbe, E. H. 1976. Biology of quackgrass. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:151–154.Google Scholar
22. Stoller, E. W. 1977. Differential cold tolerance of quackgrass and johnsongrass rhizomes. Weed Sci. 25:348–351.Google Scholar
23. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1990. Rhizome bud viability of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) treated with glyphosate and quizalofop. Weed Technol. 4:529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Tardif, F. J. and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Variability of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotypes in Quebec. Phytoprotection 72:115–121.Google Scholar
25. Williams, E. D. 1973. Variation in growth of seedlings and clones of Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Weed Res. 13:24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays) . Weed Sci. 32:226–234.Google Scholar