Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:04:13.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultivation and Herbicides for Weed Control in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Norman C. Glaze
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Univ. Ga, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793
Melvin R. Hall
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Univ. Ga, Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793

Abstract

Alachlor, chloramben, cinmethylin, diphenamid, fluazifop, fluazifop-P, metolachlor, metribuzin, napropamide, oryzalin, and sethoxydim were applied on transplanted sweet potato at Tifton, GA, during 1982 to 1985. The weeds most prevalent were large crabgrass, Florida pusley, smallflower morningglory, and yellow nutsedge. No significant phytotoxicity was observed from any herbicide treatment over the 4 yr. Cultivation at 4 wk is advantageous to eliminate early flushes of weeds which escape control and reform the beds. Alachlor or metolachlor at 4.5 and 3.4 kg ha-1, respectively, and metribuzin controlled weeds best. Although no serious phytotoxicity was evident, these treatments tended to cause lowered yields of marketable roots while marginally affecting total yields in most cases. Metribuzin was the only compound which controlled late-season broadleaf weeds such as smallflower morningglory effectively.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Glaze, N. C., Harmon, S. A., and Phatak, S. C. 1982. Enhancement of herbicidal weed control in sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas) with cultivation. Weed Sci. 29:275281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Harrison, H. F. Jr., Jones, A., and Dukes, P. D. 1985. Differential response of six sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 33:730733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Harrison, H. F. Jr., Jones, A., and Dukes, P. D. 1982. Herbicide evaluation in sweet potatoes. Proc. South. Weed Sci Soc. 35:99.Google Scholar
4. Herman, N.D., Monaco, T.J., and Sheets, T.J. 1983. Weed control with alachlor and residues in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and soil Weed Sci. 31:567571.Google Scholar
5. Hernandez, T. P., Thibodeaux, S. D., and Constantin, R. 1977. Weed control in sweet potatoes and subsequent evaluation for effect on quality. HortScience 12:236.Google Scholar
6. Monks, D. W., Coffey, D. L., Cordrey, T. D., and McLaurin, W. J. 1981. Herbicide evaluation in sweet potatoes. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:106.Google Scholar
7. Peterson, L. E., Robbins, M. L., and Weigle, L. L. 1972. Herbicidal control of weeds in sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas Poir. HortScience 7:6566.Google Scholar
8. Porter, W. C. 1980. Herbicide evaluations for sweet potatoes. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 33:97100.Google Scholar
9. Riggleman, J. D., and Matthews, W. A. 1963. Chemical weed control in sweet potatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 17:5862.Google Scholar
10. Talbert, R.E. 1966. Weed control studies in sweet potatoes and southern peas. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 19:176180.Google Scholar
11. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America. Fifth Edition, WSSA, Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
12. Welker, W. V. Jr. 1967. Effect of herbicides on quality and yield of sweet potatoes. Weeds 15:112113.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, H. P., Graves, B., and Savage, C. P. Jr. 1974. Effects of incorporation depth and activated carbon on sweet potato response to vernolate. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 99:245246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar