Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:11:18.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population Dynamics of Broadleaf Weeds in Turfgrass as Influenced by Chemical and Biological Control Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mohammed H. Abu-Dieyeh
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste.-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada, H9X 3V9
Alan K. Watson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste.-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada, H9X 3V9
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A 3-yr field study was conducted to determine the effect of a biological control agent, Sclerotinia minor Jagger, and a common herbicide, Killex, on the population dynamics of dandelion and other broadleaf species and on the dandelion seed bank. Treatments were applied as one spring, one early autumn, or a spring plus an early autumn treatment per year. The response of the dandelion population to a spring herbicide treatment was similar to two applications per year (spring and early autumn). Significantly less dandelion control occurred after the first early autumn application of the herbicide. Two weeks after application, spring or early autumn treatments with S. minor were equally effective in suppressing dandelions. In the second year of the two applications per year of S. minor treatment, weed control was equivalent to the herbicide. By the third year of the one spring application of S. minor, weed control was equivalent to the herbicide. Generally over the study period, the early autumn application of S. minor was less effective than the spring or the spring and early autumn applications. The S. minor treatments significantly reduced the dandelion seed bank, and this effect was not significantly different from the Killex herbicide treatment. The rate, frequency, and seasonal timing of application had no effect on the dandelion seed-bank size, but terminating the application would gradually replenish the seed bank. Populations of white clover, broadleaf plantain, birdsfoot trefoil, and common ragweed were similarly suppressed by either the S. minor or the herbicide treatments. Yellow woodsorrel significantly increased after 1 yr of herbicide treatment compared with the S. minor and untreated control treatments, indicating a possible weed species shift. Turf quality was improved because of the herbicide and S. minor treatments, but grass injury and smooth crabgrass invasion were recorded in 17% of herbicide-treated plots.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. 2006. Population dynamics of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) in turfgrass as influenced by a biological control agent, Sclerotinia minor . Ph.D dissertation, Montreal, Canada McGill University.Google Scholar
Abu-Dieyeh, M. H., Bernier, J., and Watson, A. K. 2005. Sclerotinia minor advances fruiting and reduces germination in dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 15:815825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. and Watson, A. K. 2005. Impact of mowing and weed control on broadleaf weed population dynamics in turf. J. Plant Interact. 1:239252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. and Watson, A. K. 2006. Effect of turfgrass mowing height on biocontrol of Taraxacum officinale with Sclerotinia minor . Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 16:509524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. and Watson, A. K. 2007a. Grass over-seeding and a fungus combine to control Taraxacum officinale . J App. Ecol. 44:115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. and Watson, A. K. 2007b. Efficacy of Sclerotinia minor for dandelion control: effect of dandelion accession, age and grass competition. Weed Res. 47:6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Weed Crop Ecology—Principles in Weed Management. North Scituate, MA Brenton.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005. Industry Task Force II on 2,4-D Research Data. http://www.24d.org. Accessed: May 16, 2005.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. 1992. Weed seed bank response to tillage, herbicides, and crop rotation sequence. Weed Sci. 40:654659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, J. B. and Green, R. L. 1994. The role of turfgrasses in environmental protection and their benefits to human. J. Environ. Qual. 23:452460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, A. and O'Knefski, R. 1980. Some treatments for Veronica and Oxalis control in turfgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:389398.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Larney, F. O., Lindwall, C. W., and Kozub, G. 1994. Crop rotation and tillage effects on weed populations on the semi-arid Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol. 8:231237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, B. D., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 2003. Weed Ecology in Natural and Agricultural Systems. UK CABI. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, S. J. and Benton, R. A. 1979. The reproductive strategies of five perennial Compositae. J. Ecol. 67:91107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busey, P. 2003. Cultural management of weeds in turfgrass: a review. Crop Sci. 43:18991911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds, I: longevity, periodicity of germination, and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Sci. Agric. 26:307346.Google Scholar
Ciotola, M., Wymore, L., and Watson, A. K. 1991. Sclerotinia, a potential mycoherbicide for lawns. WSSA Abs. 30:81.Google Scholar
Cisar, J. L. 2004. Managing turf sustainably: new directions for a diverse planet. Brisbane, Australia Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. and Croft, A. M. 2000. Weed populations and pathogens. Weed Res. 40:6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. 1999. Herbicide fact sheet, 2,4-D: exposure. J. Pestic. Reform. 19 (4):1419.Google Scholar
Crafts, A. S. 1962. Use of labelled compounds in herbicide research. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 13:407415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cyr, D. R., Bewley, J. D., and Dumbroff, E. B. 1990. Seasonal dynamics of carbohydrate and nitrogenous components in the roots of perennial weeds. Plant Cell Environ. 13:359365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, A. C. and Rutherford, P. P. 1972. Response of dandelion root tissue to treatment with 2,4- and 3,5-dichlorophenoxyacetic acids. Phytochemistry. 11:31433148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doust, L. L., MacKinnon, A., and Doust, L. J. 1985. Biology of Canadian weeds, 71: Oxalis stricta L., O. corniculata L., O. dillenii Jacq. ssp. dillenii and O. dillenii Jacq. ssp. filipes (small) Eiten. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:691709.Google Scholar
Emmons, R. 1995. Turfgrass Science and Management. Albany, NY Delmar. 512.Google Scholar
Ford, H. 1981. The demography of three populations of dandelion. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15:355368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, N. T. and Van Acker, R. C. 2003. Distribution and interference of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) in spring canola. Weed Sci. 51:435442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. New York J. Wiley. 680.Google Scholar
Gray, E., McGehee, E. M., and Carlisle, D. F. 1973. Seasonal variation in flowering of common dandelion. Weed Sci. 21:230232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S., Gaunt, R. E., Bourdot, G. W., and Field, R. J. 1998. Influence of phenology, defoliation, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on regrowth potential of Ranunculus acris . N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 41:125133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, S. G. 2005. Where are the bioherbicides? Weed Sci. 53:404415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K., Baron, V., Chanasyk, D., and Stevenson, F. 2000. Grazing intensity effects on weed populations in annual and perennial pasture system. Weed Sci. 48:231238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, B. 2000. Weed Population Dynamics. http://www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/qtr00-1/popdyn.htm. Accessed: May 21 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, P. E. and Melander, B. 2003. Combining physical, cultural and biological methods: prospects for integrated non-chemical weed management strategies. Weed Res. 43:303322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgenfeld, K. L., Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Mason, S. C. 2004. Weed management in a glyphosate resistant soybean system: weed species shifts. Weed Technol. 18:284291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L., Doll, J., Holm, E., Pancho, J., and Herberger, J. 1997. World weeds: natural histories and distribution. New York J. Wiley. 1129.Google Scholar
Hoya, A., Shibaike, H., Morita, T., and Motomi, I. 2004. Germination and seedling survivorship characteristics of hybrids between native and alien species of dandelion (Taraxacum). Plant Species Biol. 19:8190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, G. A., Bourdot, G. W., and Saville, D. J. 2001. Effect of application time on the efficacy of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum as a mycoherbicide for Cirsium arvense control in pasture. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 11:317330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1982. Influence of herbicide rotation treatments on species composition of weeds in turfgrass. Weed Sci. 30:548552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, A. C. and Kremer, R. J. 1996. Microorganisms in weed control strategies. J. Prod. Agric. 9:480485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, K. L. and Guillard, K. 2002. Clipping management and nitrogen fertilization of turfgrass: growth, nitrogen utilization and quality. Crop Sci. 42:12251231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, S. U., Kristoffersen, P., and Fischer, J. 2004. Turfgrass management and weed control without pesticides on football pitches in Denmark. Pest Manag. Sci. 50:579587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, H. 1981. Common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) control with 2,4-D and mechanical treatments. Weed Sci. 29:704708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzer, M. and Boland, G. 1994. Epidemiology of lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia minor . J. Plant Pathol. 16:170–101.Google Scholar
Mezynski, P. R. and Cole, D. F. 1974. Germination of dandelion seeds on a thermogradient plate. Weed Sci. 22:506507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molgaard, P. 1977. Competitive effects of grass on establishment and performance of Taraxacum officinale . Oikos. 29:376382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C., and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Weed Science: Principles and Practices. New York J. Wiley. 671.Google Scholar
Neumann, S. and Boland, G. J. 2002. Influence of host and pathogen variables on the efficacy of Phoma herbarum, a potential biological control agent of Taraxacum officinale. Can. J. Bot. 80:425429.Google Scholar
Noronha, A., Andersson, L., and Milberg, P. 1997. Rate of change in dormancy level and light requirement in weed seeds during stratification. Ann. Bot. 80:795801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology– Implications for Management. New York J. Wiley. 589.Google Scholar
Riddle, G., Burpee, L., and Boland, G. 1991. Virulence of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and S. minor on dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Weed Sci. 39:109118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Neilson, J. E. 1981. Seed survival and periodicity of seedling emergence in twelve weedy species of Compositae. Ann. Appl. Biol. 97:325334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnick, P., Stewart-Wade, S. M., and Boland, G. J. 2002. 2,4-D and Sclerotinia minor to control common dandelion. Weed Sci. 50:173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solbrig, O. and Simpson, B. 1974. Components of regulation of a population of dandelion in Michigan. J. Ecol. 62:473486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Wade, S. M., Green, S., Boland, G. J., Teshler, M., Teshler, I., Watson, A. K., Sampson, K., DiTommaso, A., and Dupont, S. 2002a. Taraxacum officinale Weber, dandelion (Asteraceae). Pages 427430. in Mason, P.G., Huber, J.T. eds. Biological Control Programs in Canada, 1981–2000. New York CABI.Google Scholar
Stewart-Wade, S. M., Neumann, S., Collins, L., and Boland, G. J. 2002b. The biology of Canadian weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G. H. Weber ex Wiggers. Can J. Plant Sci. 82:825853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Heerdt, G. N. J., Verweij, G. L., Bekker, R. M., and Bakker, J. P. 1996. An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Funct. Ecol. 10:144151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, D. J. and Grant, W. F. 1974. Differential response of 14 weed species to seven herbicides in two plant communities. Can. J. Bot. 52:525533.Google Scholar
Turgeon, A. J. 2005. Turfgrass Management. 8th ed. Reston, VA Reston Publishing. 416.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates. http://www.epa.gov. Accessed: July 20, 2004.Google Scholar
Vavrek, M. C. 1998. Within-population genetic diversity of Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae): Differential genotype response and effect on interspecific competition. Am. J. Bot. 85:947954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vavrek, M. C., McGraw, J. B., and Bennington, C. C. 1997. Within-population variation in demography of Taraxacum officinale: maintenance of genetic diversity. Ecology. 77:20982107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiecko, G. 2000. Sequential herbicide treatments for goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) turf. Weed Technol. 14:686691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G. and Michiels, A. 2003. Fall herbicide treatments affect carbohydrate content in roots of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Weed Sci. 51:299304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar