Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:17:08.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noncompetitive Growth and Fecundity of Wisconsin Giant Ragweed Resistant to Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Courtney E. Glettner  and
David E. Stoltenberg
Courtney E. Glettner
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
David E. Stoltenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed has been confirmed in several Midwestern states. In some cases, weed resistance to glyphosate has been shown to carry a fitness penalty. Previous research has found that a glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed biotype from Indiana with a rapid necrosis response to glyphosate displayed early, rapid growth in the absence of glyphosate, flowered earlier, but produced 25% less seed than a sensitive biotype, suggesting that there may be a fitness penalty associated with the rapid necrosis resistance trait. In Wisconsin, we have recently identified a giant ragweed accession with a 6.5-fold level of resistance to glyphosate that does not demonstrate the rapid necrosis response. Our objective was to determine the noncompetitive growth and fecundity of the resistant accession in the absence of glyphosate, relative to a sensitive accession from a nearby field border population. In greenhouse experiments, plant height, leaf area, and dry shoot biomass were similar between the resistant and sensitive accessions during vegetative growth to the onset of flowering. The instantaneous relative growth rate, instantaneous net assimilation rate, and instantaneous leaf area ratio also did not differ between accessions. However, fecundity of resistant plants (812 seeds plant−1) was greater (P = 0.008) than sensitive plants (425 seeds plant−1). The percentage of intact viable seeds, intact nonviable seeds, and empty involucres did not differ between resistant and sensitive accessions. These results indicate that resistance of this accession of giant ragweed to glyphosate has not affected its growth and development relative to a sensitive accession. The greater fecundity and similar viability of resistant plants relative to sensitive plants suggests that in the absence of selection by glyphosate, the frequency of the resistance trait for glyphosate may increase in the giant ragweed field population over time.

Keywords

Giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRFitnessfrequency of resistance traitsrapid necrosis
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 63 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 273 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazzaz, FA (1979) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. II. Germination, emergence, growth and survival. New Phytol 83:817–827 Google Scholar
Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazzaz, FA, Hunt, R (1979) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. III. Growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol 83:829–838 Google Scholar
Alcorta, M, Fidelibus, MW, Steenwerth, KL, Shrestha, A (2011) Competitive effects of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible horseweed (Conyza canadensis) on young grapevines (Vitis vinifera). Weed Sci. 59:489–494 Google Scholar
Barnett, KA, Steckel, LE (2013) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) competition in cotton. Weed Sci. 61:543–548 Google Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci. 62:1003–1010 Google Scholar
Baucom, RS, Mauricio, R (2004) Fitness costs and benefits of novel herbicide tolerance in a noxious weed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:13386–13390 Google Scholar
Baysinger, JA, Sims, BD (1991) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:358–362 Google Scholar
Brabham, CB, Gerber, CK, Johnson, WG (2011) Fate of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in the presence and absence of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 59:506–511 Google Scholar
Bradshaw, LD, Padgette, SR, Kimball, SL, Wells, BH (1997) Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 11:189–198 Google Scholar
Chandi, A, Jordan, DL, York, AC, Milla-Lewis, SR, Burton, JD, Culpepper, SA, Whitaker, JR (2013) Interference and control of glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci. 61:259–266 Google Scholar
Conley, SP (2001) Interference among giant foxtail (Setaria faberi), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and soybean (Glycine max). Ph.D Dissertation. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin–Madison. Pp 1–15 Google Scholar
Cullen, E, Davis, V, Jensen, B, Nice, G, Renz, M (2012) Pest management in Wisconsin field crops—2013. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin–Extension, Cooperative Extension. 113 pGoogle Scholar
Davis, AS, Clay, S, Cardina, J, Dille, A, Forcella, F, Lindquist, J, Sprague, C (2013) Seed burial physical environment explains departures from regional hydrothermal model of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) seedling emergence in U.S. Midwest. Weed Sci. 61:415–421 Google Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Bauman, TT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2009) Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) population dynamics and crop yield—years III and IV. Weed Sci. 57:417–426 Google Scholar
Fickett, ND, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE (2013a) Predicted corn yield loss due to weed competition prior to postemergence herbicide application on Wisconsin farms. Weed Technol 27:54–62 Google Scholar
Fickett, ND, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE (2013b) Soybean yield loss potential associated with early-season weed competition across 64 site-years. Weed Sci. 61:500–507 Google Scholar
Gaines, TA, Zhang, W, Wang, D, Bukun, B, Chisholm, ST, Shaner, DL, Nissen, SJ, Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ, Culpepper, SA, Grey, TL, Webster, TM, Vencill, WK, Sammons, RD, Jiang, J, Preston, C, Leach, JE, Westra, P (2010) Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:1029–1034 Google Scholar
Ge, X, d'Avignon, DA, Ackerman, JJH, Sammons, RD (2010) Rapid vacuolar sequestration: the horseweed glyphosate resistance mechanism. Pest Manag Sci. 66:345–348 Google Scholar
Giacomini, D, Westra, P, Ward, SM (2014) Impact of genetic background in fitness cost studies: an example from glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth. Weed Sci. 62:29–37 Google Scholar
Glettner, CE (2013) Physiology, growth, and fecundity of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Wisconsin. . Madison, WI University of Wisconsin–Madison. 100 pGoogle Scholar
Gramig, GG, Stoltenberg, DE (2007) Leaf appearance base temperature and phyllochron for common grass and broadleaf weed species. Weed Technol 21:249–254 Google Scholar
Gramig, GG, Stoltenberg, DE, Norman, JM (2006) Weed species radiation-use efficiency as affected by competitive environment. Weed Sci. 54:1013–1024 Google Scholar
Gray, JA, Stoltenberg, DE, Balke, NE (1995) Productivity and intraspecific competitive ability of a velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) biotype resistant to atrazine. Weed Sci. 43:619–626 Google Scholar
Harnett, DC, Hartnett, BB, Bazzaz, FA (1987) Persistence of Ambrosia trifida populations in old fields and responses to successional changes. Am J Bot. 74:1239–1248 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT (2003) Postdispersal predation of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) seed in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 51:955–964 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT, Harrison, JM (2007) Seed size and burial effects on giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) emergence and seed demise. Weed Sci. 55:16–22 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT, Webb, JE (2001) Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49:224–229 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2013) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed September 27, 2013Google Scholar
Hunt, R (1978) Growth analysis of individual plants. Pages 8–25 in Plant Growth Analysis. Studies in Biology No. 96. London, England Edward Arnold Publishers Google Scholar
Hunt, R, Bazzaz, FA (1980) The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. V. Response to fertilizer, with growth analysis at the organismal and sub-organismal levels. New Phytol 84:113–121 Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Brûlé-Babel, AL, Morrison, IN (1996) The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci. 44:176–193 Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Maxwell, BD (1994) Population genetics and the evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. Phytoprotection 75:25–35 Google Scholar
Johnson, W, Barnes, J, Gibson, K, Weller, S (2004) Late-season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Crop Manage. DOI: 10.1094/CM-2004-0923-01-BRGoogle Scholar
Kruger, GR, Johnson, WG, Weller, SC, Owen, MDK, Shaw, DR, Wilcut, JW, Jordan, DL, Wilson, RG, Bernards, ML, Young, BG (2009) U.S. grower views on problematic weeds and changes in weed pressure in glyphosate-resistant corn, cotton, and soybean cropping systems. Weed Technol 23:162–166 Google Scholar
Lorraine-Colwill, DF, Powles, SB, Hawkes, TR, Hollinshead, PH, Warner, SAJ, Preston, C (2003) Investigations into the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum . Pestic Biochem Physiol 74:62–72 Google Scholar
Marion, S, Glettner, C, Trower, T, Davis, V, Stoltenberg, D (2013) Acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitor resistance in Wisconsin giant ragweed. Wis Crop Manager 20:52–53 http://www.ipcm.wisc.edu. Accessed June 6, 2013Google Scholar
Marshall, MW, Al-Khatib, K, Loughin, T (2001) Gene flow, growth, and competitiveness of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower. Weed Sci. 49:14–21 Google Scholar
Moechnig, MJ, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE, Binning, LK (2003) Growth interactions in communities of lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and corn. Weed Sci. 51:363–370 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Riar, D, Jha, P, Scott, RC (2011) Confirmation, control, and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 25:430–435 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 60(sp1):31–62 Google Scholar
Pedersen, PB, Neve, P, Andreasen, C, Powles, SB (2007) Ecological fitness of a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population: growth and seed production along a competition gradient. Basic Appl Ecol 8:258–268 Google Scholar
Peters, J (2000) Section A-B, Asteraceae . in Peters, J, ed. Tetrazolium Testing Handbook Contribution 29. 2nd edn. Lincoln, NE Association of Official Seed Analysts Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Yu, Q (2010) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 61:317–347 Google Scholar
Preston, C, Wakelin, AM (2008) Resistance to glyphosate from altered herbicide translocation patterns. Pest Manage Sci. 64:372–376 Google Scholar
Preston, C, Wakelin, AM, Dolman, FC, Bostamam, Y, Boutsalis, P (2009) A decade of glyphosate-resistant Lolium around the world: mechanisms, genes, fitness, and agronomic management. Weed Sci. 57:435–441 Google Scholar
Regnier, EE, Salvucci, ME, Stoller, EW (1988) Photosynthesis and growth responses to irradiance in soybean (Glycine max) and three broadleaf weeds. Weed Sci. 36:487–496 Google Scholar
Roush, ML, Radosevich, SR, Maxwell, BD (1990) Future outlook for herbicide-resistance research. Weed Technol 4:208–214 Google Scholar
Schafer, JR, Hallett, SG, Johnson, WG (2012) Response of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes to glyphosate in the presence and absence of soil microorganisms. Weed Sci. 60:641–649 Google Scholar
Schafer, JR, Hallett, SG, Johnson, WG (2013) Soil microbial root colonization of glyphosate-treated giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes. Weed Sci. 61:289–295 Google Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (2012) Seed dormancy and adaptive seedling emergence timing in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci. 60:19–26 Google Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (2008a) The association between seed size and longevity among maternal families in Ambrosia trifida L. populations. Seed Sci Res 18:201–211 Google Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK, Schmoll, JT, Spokas, K, Forcella, F (2008b) A hydrothermal seedling emergence model for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci. 56:555–560 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2009) Role of translocation as a mechanism of resistance to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 57:118–123 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, Lindenmeyer, RB, Ostlie, MH (2012) What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? Pest Manag Sci. 68:3–9 Google Scholar
Stoller, EW, Wax, LM (1974) Dormancy changes and fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 22:151–155 Google Scholar
Stoltenberg, D, Yerka, M, Glettner, C, Stute, J, Trower, T (2012) Giant ragweed resistance to glyphosate in Wisconsin. Wis Crop Manager 19:43–44 http://www.ipcm.wisc.edu. Accessed June 21, 2012Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM, Goh, SS, Gaines, TA, Han, H, Busi, R, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2014) No fitness cost of glyphosate resistance endowed by massive EPSPS gene amplification in Amaranthus palmeri . Planta. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-013-2022-xGoogle Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Ontario: dose response and control with postemergence herbicides. Am J Plant Sci. 3:608–617 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Loux, MM, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (1994) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 8:559–564 Google Scholar
Westhoven, AM, Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2008a) Field presence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) biotypes with elevated tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Technol 22:544–548 Google Scholar
Westhoven, AM, Kruger, GR, Gerber, CK, Stachler, JM, Loux, MM, Johnson, WG (2008b) Characterization of selected common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes with tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 56:685–691 Google Scholar
Zelaya, IA, Owen, MDK, VanGessel, MJ (2004) Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Theor Appl Genet 110:58–70 Google Scholar
Ziska, LH (2002) Sensitivity of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) to urban ozone concentrations. Funct Plant Biol. 29:1365–1369 Google Scholar