Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T13:48:09.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasion Biologists and the Biofuels Boom: Cassandras or Colleagues?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Daniel Simberloff
Daniel Simberloff*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996. Author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modern invasion biology is a new science, with the holy grail of being able to predict the trajectory of particular invasions. Although this goal has yet to be achieved, there has been much progress through experimental research and meticulous study of the scope and mechanisms of existing invasions. Several well-established patterns are relevant to potential biofuel feedstocks: (1) ca. half of all damaging plant invaders were deliberately introduced, not accidental hitchhikers or escapees; (2) some native plants have become invasive; coevolution with native community members was not proof against unexpected damage; (3) many introduced plants were innocuous for decades or even centuries in their new locations before suddenly exploding across the landscape; lack of current observed impact does not guarantee safety; and (4) control or even eradication of widespread invaders is sometimes possible, but it is far from certain and it is often very expensive. We cannot count on effectively managing an introduction gone awry. Because much invasion biology is targeted at developing methods of preventing anthropogenic movement or establishment of species, invasion biologists have occasionally been assailed as obstructionists by various interests who fear their livelihoods will be impeded: the seed and horticulture trades, foresters, the pet industry, fish and game biologists, etc. A fringe group of philosophers, sociologists, landscape architects, and others have even taken to calling invasion biology a thinly veiled form of xenophobia. Some biofuels advocates have joined this litany, accusing invasion biologists of playing on the emotions of an uneducated public by raising fears of a new kudzu. Invasion biologists need not be cast in this role. In collaboration with agronomists, geneticists, physiologists, and other scientists, they have much to offer in understanding the risks posed by particular feedstocks and developing approaches that would minimize these risks and mitigate unforeseen consequences.

Keywords

Kudzu, Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi. PUELO.Biofuelenemy-release hypothesiseradicationfeedstockinvasiontime lag
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 867 - 872
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arno, S. F. and Gruel, G. E. 1983. Fire history at the forest–grassland ecotone in southwestern Montana. J. Range Manag. 36:332–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arno, S. F. and Gruel, G. E. 1986. Douglas-fir encroachment into mountain grasslands in southwestern Montana. J. Range Manag. 39:272–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. N. and DiTomaso, J. M. 2008. Nonnative species and bioenergy: are we cultivating the next invader. BioScience. 58:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H. 1989. Waterweed invasions. Sci. Am. 260:90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, S. C. H. and Richardson, B. J. 1986. Genetic attributes of invading species. Pages 21–33. in Groves, R. H. and Burdon, J. J. Ecology of Biological Invasions: An Australian Perspective. Canberra Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Bright, C. 1998. Life Out of Bounds. New York W. W. Norton. 292 p.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J. W. and Tisdale, E. W. 1976. Causes of juniper invasion in southwestern Idaho. Ecology. 57:472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, J. A. 2005. Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Écoscience. 12:316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, J. R. and Kelly, C. N. 2007. Pinus virginiana invasion influences soils and arbuscular mycorrhizae of a serpentine grassland. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 134:63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. A. 2006. Invasion biology 1958–2005: the pursuit of science and conservation. Pages 35–64. in Cadotte, M. W., McMahon, S. M., and Fukami, T. Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature. Dordrecht, the Netherlands Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, R. S. 1998. Alien Invasion. America's Battle with Non-Native Animals and Plants. Washington, DC National Geographic Society. 288 p.Google Scholar
Dodd, J. and Randall, R. P. 2002. Eradication of kochia (Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, Chenopodiaceae) in Western Australia. Pages 300–303. in Spafford Jacob, H., Dodd, J., and Moore, J. H. 13th Australian Weeds Conference Papers and Proceedings. Perth, Australia Plant Protection Society of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London, UK Methuen. 181 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eplee, R. E. 2001. Coordination of witchweed eradication in the USA. in Wittenberg, R. and Cock, M. J. W. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, UK CAB International. 36.Google Scholar
Ewel, J. J. 1986. Invasibility: lessons from south Florida. Pages 214–230. in Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstad, D. H., Ziska, L. H., Runion, G. B., Prior, S. A., Torbert, H. A. III, and Rogers, H. H. Jr. 2006. Potential Use of Kudzu as a Biofuel. [CD-ROM] Alternative Energy Solutions from Alabama's Natural Resources Conference. [Abstract] Auburn, AL: Auburn University.Google Scholar
Goeden, R. D. and Andrés, L. A. 1999. Biological control of weeds in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Pages 871–890. in Bellows, T. S. and Fisher, T. W. Handbook of Biological Control: Principles and Applications. San Diego Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. R. and Thomas, K. P. 1997. Florida's invasion by nonindigenous plants: history, screening, and regulation. Pages 21–37. In Simberloff, D., Schmitz, D. C., and Brown, T. C. Strangers in Paradise. Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Washington, DC Island.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. 2008. Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci. 174:246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, T. N. Jr. 1962. One-seed juniper invasion of northern Arizona grasslands. Ecol. Monogr. 32:187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, R. M. and Crawley, M. J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolar, C. S. and Lodge, D. M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolar, C. S. and Lodge, D. M. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science. 298:1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowarik, I. 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Pages 15–38. in Pysek, P., Prach, K., Rejmánek, M., and Wade, M. Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam SPB Academic.Google Scholar
Lavergne, S. and Molofsky, J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:3883–3888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X., Weng, J-K., and Chapple, C. 2008. Improvement of biomass through lignin modification. Plant J. 54:569–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons from ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, S. P., Dohleman, F., Jones, M. B., Clifton-Brown, J., and Jørgensen, U. 2007. Miscanthus—panacea for energy security and the Midwest economy or another kudzu. Ill. Steward. 16 (1):31–32.Google Scholar
Low, T. and Booth, C. 2007. The Weedy Truth about Biofuels. Melbourne, Australia Invasive Species Council. 43 p.Google Scholar
MacDonald, G. E. 2007. Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica): biology, distribution, and impacts in the southeastern U.S. Pages 10–23. in Loewenstein, N. J. and Miller, J. H. Proceedings of the Regional Cogongrass Conference: A Cogongrass Management Guide. Auburn, AL Auburn University Department of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. A 16-yr survey on levels of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Weed Sci. 41:669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. H. 1996. Kudzu eradication and management. Pages 137–149. in Hoots, D. and Baldwin, J. Kudzu, the Vine to Love or Hate. Kodak, TN Suntop.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. 2003. Nonnative invasive plants of southern forests: a field guide for identification and control. Asheville, NC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–62.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. and Edwards, B. 1983. Kudzu: where did it come from? And how can we stop it. South. J. Appl. For. 7:165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council 2002. Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, DC National Academy Press. 194 p.Google Scholar
Pauly, M. and Keegstra, K. 2008. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 54:559–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A., and Halloy, S. R. 1999. A weed risk assessment model of use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manag. 57:239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghu, S., Anderson, R. C., Daehler, C. C., Davis, A. S., Wiedenmann, R. N., Simberloff, D., and Mack, R. N. 2006. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire. Science. 313:1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, R. 2001. Eradication of a deliberately introduced plant found to be invasive. Pages 174. in Wittenberg, R. and Cock, M. J. W. Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit of Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, UK CAB International.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. H. and Hamilton, C. W. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejmánek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal. Pages 249–253. In Veitch, C. R. and Clout, M. N. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. GlandCambridge, SwitzerlandUK IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. and Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive. Ecology. 77:1655–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. M. and Pyšek, P. 2008. Fifty years of invasion ecology—the legacy of Charles Elton. Divers. Distrib. 14:161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2445–2449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrader-Frechette, K. 2001. Non-indigenous species and ecological explanation. Biol. Philos. 16:507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. and McCoy, E. D. 1994. Applied ecology and the logic of case studies. Philos. Sci. 61:228–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 1981. Community effects of introduced species. Pages 53–81. in Nitecki, M. H. Biotic Crises in Ecological and Evolutionary Time. New York Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2000. Foreword. Pages vii–xiv in C. S. Elton. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2003. Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia. Biol. Invasions. 5:179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. 2004. Community ecology: is it time to move on. Am. Nat. 163:787–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strang, R. M. and Parminter, J. V. 1980. Conifer encroachment on the Chilcotin grasslands of British Columbia. For. Chron. 56:13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiet, R. K. and Boerner, R. E. J. 2007. Spatial patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculum in arbuscular mycorrhizal barrens communities: implications for controlling invasion by Pinus virginiana . Mycorrhiza. 17:507–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. D. 1991. The biology of an invasive plant: what makes Spartina anglica so successful. BioScience. 41:393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, G. M. 1922. The Naturalisation of Animals and Plants in New Zealand. Auckland Cambridge University Press. 607 p.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. C., Lambrinos, J. G., and Grosholz, E. D. 2007. Nitrogen inputs promote the spread of an invasive marsh grass. Ecol. Appl. 17:1886–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, T. R. 1975. Invasion of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate) by white fir (Abies concolor) on the southeastern slopes of the Warner Mountains, California. Great Basin Nat. 35:319–324.Google Scholar
Valéry, L., Bouchard, V., and Lefeuvre, J-C. 2004. Impact of the invasive native species Elymus athericus on carbon pools in a salt marsh. Wetlands. 24:268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valéry, L., Fritz, H., Lefeuvre, J-C., and Simberloff, D. 2008. Ecosystem-level consequences of invasions by native species as a way to investigate relationships between evenness and ecosystem function. Biol. Invasions. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar