Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:32:56.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History of Weevils on Puncturevine in and Near the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. M. Maddox
D. M. Maddox*
Affiliation:
Biol. Control of Weeds Lab., U.S. Dep. Agric. Western Region, 1050 San Pablo Ave., Albany, CA 94706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The seed weevil (Microlarinus lareynii Jacquelin duVal) and the stem weevil (M. lypriformis Wollaston) were introduced into the United States and the West Indies to control puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris L.) and Jamaica feverplant (T. cistoides L.). In 14 yr these weevils have partially controlled these weeds in most areas where weevil establishment has occurred. However, indigenous parasitoids, predators, and cold weather affect weevil densities. Presently a coldhardy strain of seed and stem weevils has become established in Nevada and promise control in colder areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , July 1976 , pp. 414 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andres, L.A. and Angalet, G.W. 1963. Notes on the ecology and host specificity of Microlarinus lareynii and M. lypriformis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and the biological control of puncturevine Tribulus terrestris . J. Econ. Entomol. 56:333–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Belschner, H.G. 1926. The diet of sheep in western N.S.W. and its relation to sickness of dietetic origin. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 37:662–668.Google Scholar
3. Bennett, F.D. 1970. Recent investigations on the biological control of some tropical and subtropical weeds. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 10:660–668.Google Scholar
4. Bennett, F.D. 1971. Some recent successes in the field of biological control in the West Indies. Paper presented at the Primer Congreso Latinoamericano de Entomologia, Cusco, Peru, (12–18 April). 8 pp.Google Scholar
5. Butler, G.W. 1965. Progress report on the biological control of puncturevine with weevils. Univ. Arizona Agric. Exp. Sta. Rep. on Turfgrass Res. No. 230:17–20.Google Scholar
6. Csiki, E. 1934. Catalogus Coleopterorum (Junk and Schenkling), Pars 134:91–2.Google Scholar
7. Daniels, N.E. and Wiese, A.F. 1967. Survival and spread of the puncturevine seed weevil in Texas. Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University, Texas Agr. Exp. Sta., MP-827 (February). 2 pp.Google Scholar
8. Davidson, A. 1903. New plant records for the Los Angeles County, Part II. S. Calif. Acad. Sci. Bull. 2:43.Google Scholar
9. Davis, C.J. and Krauss, N.L.H. 1966. Recent introductions for biological control. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 19:201–207.Google Scholar
10. Engler, A. and Prantl, K. 1931. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol 19a, 2nd ed. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany. 470 pp.Google Scholar
11. Goeden, R.D. and Ricker, D.W. 1967. Geocoris pallens found to be predaceous on Microlarinus spp. introduced to California for the biological control of puncturevine, Tribulus terrestris . J. Econ. Entomol. 60:725–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Goeden, R.D. and Ricker, D.W. 1970. Parasitization of introduced puncturevine weevils by indigenous Chalcidoidea in southern California. J. Econ. Entomol. 63:827–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Huffaker, C.B., Ricker, D.W., and Kennett, C.E. 1961. Biological control of puncturevine with imported weevils. Calif. Agric. 15:11–12.Google Scholar
14. Hurst, E. 1942. The poisonous plants of New South Wales (Poisonous Plants Committee of New South Wales). Sydney, Snelling. 498 pp.Google Scholar
15. Johnson, E. 1932. The puncturevine in California. Univ. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 528. 42 pp.Google Scholar
16. MacBride, J.F. 1943. Flora of Peru. Fieldiana (Botany) 13:648–649.Google Scholar
17. Orchard, H.E. and Richardson, J.M. 1953. Weeds of South Australia, No. II, Bull. Dep. Agric. South. Aust. No. 431 (June). 43 pp.Google Scholar
18. Phillips, E.P. 1951. The genera of South African Flowering Plants, (Botanican Survey of So. Africa, Memoir #25). Govt. Printer, Pretoria. 905 pp.Google Scholar
19. Squires, V.R. 1969. Ecological factors contributing to the success of Tribulus terrestris L. as a weed in a winter rainfall environment in southern Australia. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 4:55–66.Google Scholar
20. Stegmaier, C.E. Jr. 1973. Colonization of the puncturevine stem weevil, Microlarinus lypriformis new record (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with notes on parasitism in south Florida. Fla. Entomol. 56:235–241.Google Scholar
21. Svenson, H.K. 1946. Vegetation of Ecuador, Peru, and Galapagos Islands. Am. J. Bot. 33:456–457.Google Scholar