Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:47:17.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Effect on Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George S. Cutts III ,
Theodore M. Webster ,
Timothy L. Grey ,
William K. Vencill ,
R. Dewey Lee ,
R. Scott Tubbs  and
William F. Anderson
George S. Cutts III*
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793
Theodore M. Webster
Affiliation:
Crop Protection and Management Unit, USDA–ARS, 2747 Davis Rd., Tifton, GA 31793
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793
William K. Vencill
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 3111 Miller Plant Science Building, Athens, GA 30602
R. Dewey Lee
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793
R. Scott Tubbs
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science Department, University of Georgia, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793
William F. Anderson
Affiliation:
Crop Genetics and Breeding Unit, USDA–ARS, 115 Coastal Way, Tifton, GA 31793
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effect of herbicides on napiergrass growth and control. In greenhouse experiments, hexazinone, glyphosate, and imazapic were applied POST, and carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation was measured with the use of an open-flow gas-exchange system up to 22 d after treatment (DAT). Carbon dioxide assimilation was reduced to zero, indicating plant death, for hexazinone- and glyphosate-treated napiergrass by 2 and 12 DAT, respectively. Imazapic-treated napiergrass CO2 assimilation declined to a constant rate by 22 DAT, but never reached zero. Field studies at Chula and Ty Ty, Georgia, evaluated herbicides for napiergrass control. Herbicide treatments included autumn-only applications, autumn followed by spring applications, and spring-only applications. All autumn-applied treatments exhibited regrowth in the spring. Plants were not affected by cold winter temperatures. A spade tillage treatment was implemented in January 2010, but was not effective in controlling napiergrass. Spring treatments included split applications of autumn treatments and spring-only treatments of glyphosate, glyphosate plus sethoxydim, and imazapyr. Sequential autumn and spring treatments containing glyphosate at both locations failed to eradicate napiergrass. Imazapyr applied spring achieved 94% plant injury by 34 DAT, and indicated potential napiergrass control. Greenhouse results indicated multiple modes of action could be effective in reducing napiergrass growth, but were inconsistent with field results. Further field studies are needed to derive conclusive methods of napiergrass control.

Keywords

Glyphosatehexazinoneimazapicimazapyrsethoxydimnapiergrass, Pennisetum purpureum SchumCarbon assimilationcellulosic biofuelcontrolgrowth reductioninvasive species
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alvarez, P. J., Burken, J. G., Coan, J. D., Dias de Oliveira, M. E., Dominguez-Faus, R., Gomez, D. E., Jaffe, A. M., Medlock, K. B., Powers, S. E., Soligo, R., and Smulcer, L. A. 2010. Fundementals of a Sustainable US Biofuels Policy. Houston, TX James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University. 133 p.Google Scholar
Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., and Steinrücken, H. C. 1980. The site of the inhibition of the shikimate pathway by glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 66:830–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. D., McCarty, L. B., Colvin, D. L., Higgins, J. M., Weinbrecht, J. S., and Moreno, J. E. 1999. Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) seedhead suppression following consecutive yearly applications of plant growth retardants. Weed Technol. 13:378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, D. D., Gaussoin, R. E., and Masters, R. A. 1999a. Native wildflower establishment with imidazolinone herbicides. HortScience. 34:283–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, D. D., Masters, R. A., and Gaussoin, R. E. 1999b. Grassland legume establishment with imazethapyr and imazapic. Agron. J. 91:592–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, D. D., Masters, R. A., Gaussoin, R. E., and Rivas-Pantoja, F. 2000. Establishment of big bluestem and Illinois bundleflower mixtures with imazapic and imazethapyr. Agron. J. 92:460–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1988. Glyphosate for johnsongrass (Sorghum halpense) control in no-till sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 36:510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunken, J. N. 1977. A systematic study of Pennisetum sect. Pennisetum (Gramineaeae). Am. J. Bot. 64:161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C., Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., and Tredaway-Ducar, J. 2004. Annual grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and imazapic. Weed Technol. 18:88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C. and Wilcut, J. W. 2003. Physiological basis for antagonism of clethodim by imazapic on goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 76:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, G. W. 1989. Registration of “Merkeron” napiergrass. Crop Sci. 29:1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, R. F. and Moshier, L. J. 1991. Absorption, translocation, and activity of CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and glyphosate in rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 39:354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, J. S. and Deck, R. E. 1991. Bluejoint reedgrass (Calamagrostis canadensis) control with glyphosate and additives. Weed Technol. 5:521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. T. and Derting, C. W. 1973. Glyphosate performance on johnsongrass and associated weed species in no-tillage soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:51–58.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. H. and Rogers, R. L. 1973. Rhizome johnsongrass control in soybeans with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:60.Google Scholar
Cutts, G. S. III. 2010. Evaluation of herbicides for napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) establishment as a crop and for control as a weed. . Athens, GA University of Georgia. 93.Google Scholar
Czarnota, M. A. and Derr, J. 2007. Controlling bamboo (Phyllostachys spp.) with herbicides. Weed Technol. 21:80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derting, C. W., Andrews, O. N. Jr., Duncan, R. G., and Frost, K. R. Jr. 1973. Two years of perennial weed control investigations with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:4–50.Google Scholar
Ducar, J. T., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. 2004. Weed management in imidazolinone-resistant corn with imazapic. Weed Technol. 18:1018–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, J. A. 1983. Pennisetum purpureum K. Schumach. Handbook of Energy Crops. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/pennisetum_purpureum.html. Accessed: February 22, 2010.Google Scholar
Faircloth, W. H., Patterson, M. G., Miller, J. H., and Teem, D. H. 2005. Wanted Dead not Alive: Cogongrass. Auburn, AL Alabama Cooperative Extension System. ANR-1241.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Chiu, T., Sammons, R. D., and Ryerse, J. S. 2003. Droplet size affects glyphosate retention, absorption, and translocation in corn. Weed Sci. 51:443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Earl, H. J., and Vencill, W. K. 2003. The effect of selected herbicides on CO2 assimilation, chlorophyll fluorescence, and stomatal conductance in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L.). Weed Sci. 51:28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Earl, H. J., and Vencill, W. K. 2004. Duration of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competitiveness after herbicide treatment. Weed Sci. 52:24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. 2005. Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council's List of Invasive Species. http://www.fleppc.org/list/list05web.pdf. Accessed: February 16, 2010.Google Scholar
Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. 2010. Coastal Plain Experiment Station, University of Georgia. http://www.georgiaweather.net. Accessed: May 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., Prostko, E. P., et al. 2003. Residual weed control with imazapic, diclosulam, and flumioxazin in southeastern peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 30:22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Mantripagada, N., and Culpepper, A. S. 2007. Residual herbicide dissipation from soil covered with low-density polyethylene mulch or left bare. Weed Sci. 55:638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Watson, V. H., and Strachan, W. F. 1988. Selective broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus L.) control in permanent pastures. Crop Prot. 7:80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, W. W., Gupta, S. K., and Khairwal, I. S., eds. 1999. Breeding for Forage. New Delhi, India Oxford and IBH Publishing. 304–316.Google Scholar
Hanna, W. W. and Ruter, J. M. 2005. “Princess” and “Prince” napiergrass. HortScience. 40:494–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmoney, K. R., Stahlman, P. W., and Hickman, K. R. 2004. Herbicide effects on established yellow old world bluestem (Bothriochloa ischaemum). Weed Technol. 18:545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmoney, K. R., Stahlman, P. W., and Hickman, K. R. 2007. Suppression of Caucasian old world bluesterm with split application of herbicides. Weed Technol. 21:573–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, P. R., Reynolds, T. L., Marshall, G., and Kirkwood, R. C. 1999. The absorption, translocation and distribution of the herbicide glyphosate in maize expressing the CP-4 transgene. J. Exp. Bot. 50:1567–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and York, A. C. 2002. Weed management in peanuts. Pages 23–51 in 2002 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. AG-331.Google Scholar
Karlsson, S. B. and Vasil, I. K. 1986. Growth, cytology and flow cytometry of embryogenic cell suspension cultures of Panicum maximum Jacq. and Pennisetum purpureum Shum. J. Plant Physiol. 123:211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosterboer, A. D. 1973. Weed control in Texas citrus with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:276.Google Scholar
Langeland, K. A. and Stocker, R. K. 2001. Control of Non-Native Plants in Natural Areas of Florida. Gainseville, FL Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Florida. SP 242.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J. C., Scurlock, J. M. O., and Huisman, W. 2000. Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenergy. 19:209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, G. E., Johnson, E. R. R. L., Shilling, D. G., Miller, D. L., and Brecke, B. J. 2002. The use of imazapyr and imazapic for cogongrass [Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.] control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:110.Google Scholar
Mannetje, L., and Jones, R. M., eds. 1992. Plant Resources of South-East Asia. 4th ed. Wageningen, Netherlands Pudoc Scientific Publishers. 191–192.Google Scholar
Mateos-Naranjo, E., Redondo-Gomez, S., Cox, L., Cornejo, J., and Figueroa, M. E. 2009. Effectiveness of glyphosate and imazamox on the control of the invasive cordgrass Spartina densiflora . Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 72:1694–1700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S., Hatton, J. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1996. Effect of AC 263,222, imazethapyr, and nicosulfuron on weed control and imidazolinone-tolerant corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 10:822–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossler, M. 2008. Florida Crop/Pest Profile: Sugarcane. Gainesville, FL Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Florida. PI-171.Google Scholar
Parochetti, J. V., Wilson, H. P., and Burt, G. W. 1975. Activity of glyphosate on johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 23:395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, K. 2002. Smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) control with imazapyr. Weed Technol. 16:826–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Grey, T. L., and Davis, J. W. 2006. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in irrigated field corn (Zea mays) with foramsulfuron, glyphosate, nicosulfuron, and pendimethalin. Weed Technol. 20:961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainbolt, C. 2005. Napiergrass: Biology and Control in Sugar Cane. Gainesville, FL Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Florida. SS-AGR-242.Google Scholar
Reiser, R., Belasco, W. I. J., and Rhodes, R. C. 1982. Identification of metabolites of hexazinone by mass spectrometry. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 10:581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, E. P. 1991. Sensitivity of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.) to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39:73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83–139 in Powles, S. B., and Holtum, J. A. M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2001. The SAS System, Version 9.2, for Windows. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fruerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, B. A., Ferrell, J. A., and Macdonald, G. E. 2008. Influence of hexazinone on Pensacola bahiagrass growth and crude protein content. Agron. J. 100:808–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidiazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxy acid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Carpinelli, M. F., and Morghan, K. J. R. 2007. Effects of imazapic on target and nontarget vegetation during revegetation. Weed Technol. 21:1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimabukuro, R. H. and Swanson, H. R. 1969. Atrazine metabolism, selectivity, and mode of action. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollenberger, L. E., Prine, G. M., Ocumpaugh, W. R., Hanna, W. W., Jones, C. S. Jr., Schank, S. C., and Kalmbacher, R. S. 1988. “Mott” Dwarf Elephantgrass—A High Quality Forage for the Subtropics and Tropics. Gainesville, FL Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Circular S-356.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 493 p.Google Scholar
von Caemmerer, S. and Furbank, R. T. 2003. The C4 pathway: an efficient CO2 pump. Photosynth. Res. 77:191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M., Wilcut, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 11:520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White House. 1999. Executive Order on Invasive Species 1999-02-03. Washington, DC The White House.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S., and Walls, F. R. 1999. Response of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and imidazolinone- resistant corn (Zea mays) to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 13:484–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, B. J., Ferrell, A., Sellers, B. A., and Macdonald, G. E. 2008. Influence of hexazinone on ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass growth and forage quality. Weed Technol. 22:499–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, K. R., Prine, G. M., Bates, D. B., and Chynoweth, D. P. 1991. Preserving elephantgrass and energycane biomass as silage for energy. Bioresource Tech. 36:253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsham, A. D. 1972. MON0 468, a potential chemical control for perennial grass weeds in no-tillage crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:175–184.Google Scholar
Zhao, G. F., Yang, H. Z., and Li, Y. H. 1999. The synthesis of novel acetolactate synthase inhibitors, N-(asymmetrically distributed phosphoryl)-N′-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl) ureas. Heteroatom Chem. 10:237–241.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar