Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:51:45.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hairy Nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) Competition with Two Potato Varieties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson ,
Brent R. Beutler  and
JaNan Farr
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Brent R. Beutler
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
JaNan Farr
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field trials were conducted at the Aberdeen Research and Extension Center to determine the effect of hairy nightshade competition on two potato varieties with different growth habits. Greenhouse replacement trials included treatments of three plants total in each pot with potato : hairy nightshade ratios of 3 : 0, 2 : 1, 1 : 2, or 0 : 3. Varieties tested were ‘Russet Burbank’ and ‘Russet Norkotah’. Greenhouse-grown hairy nightshade (cotyledon to one-leaf stage) were transplanted into pots earlier than or at the same time as potato plant emergence. As the number of Russet Burbank plants per pot decreased, potato plant biomass dry weight (average per plant) increased, regardless of hairy nightshade number or transplant time. When hairy nightshade were transplanted before Russet Norkotah emergence, potato plant biomass dry weight per plant was similar, regardless of potato : nightshade ratio. Field trials were conducted with Russet Burbank and Russet Norkotah in 2004 and 2005. At potato emergence, greenhouse-grown hairy nightshade plants (one- to two-leaf) were transplanted in between potato rows at densities of 0, 1, 2, or 3 plants m−1 row, and solid-seeded at approximately 100 plants m−1 row. Hairy nightshade biomass, stem and berry number, and seeds per berry were reduced by competition from Russet Burbank due to the amount and duration of shading, as compared with Russet Norkotah. Russet Burbank U.S. No. 1 and total tuber yields in plots with 1 hairy nightshade plant m−1 row were similar to weed-free control yields, whereas yields in plots with 2, 3, or 100 m−1 row were reduced in comparison. In contrast, Russet Norkotah yields were reduced when only 1 hairy nightshade plant m−1 row was present. Overall, Russet Norkotah were less competitive with hairy nightshade than Russet Burbank in both the greenhouse replacement and field trials.

Keywords

Hairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides auct. non Sendtner SOLSA, Solanum physalifolium Rusbypotato, Solanum tuberosum LWeed competition
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, T. C. and Davis, J. R. 1982. Distribution of tobacco rattle virus and potato virus X in leaves, roots and fruits and/or seeds of naturally infected weeds. Am. Potato J. 59:149–153.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M. and Hutchinson, P. J. S. 2005. Managing nightshade plants to reduce potato viruses and insect vectors. Outlooks Pest Manag. 16:249–252.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M., Stoltz, R. L., Baird, C. R., and Sandvol, L. E. 2003. Insects and their management. Pages 205–239 in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Agriculture Communications.Google Scholar
Basset, I. J. and Munro, D. B. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 67. Solanum ptycanthum Dun., S. nigrum L. and S. sarrachoides Sendt. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:410–414.Google Scholar
Bazirmakenga, R. and Leroux, G. D. 1998. Economic and interference threshold densities of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci. 46:176–180.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1991. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 39:48–53.Google Scholar
Conley, S. P., Binning, L. K., and Connell, T. R. 2001. Effect of cultivar, row spacing, and weed management on weed biomass, potato yield, and net crop value. Am. J. Potato Res. 78:31–37.Google Scholar
Connell, T. R., Binning, L. K., and Schmitt, W. G. 1999. A canopy development model for potatoes. Am. J. Potato Res. 76:153–159.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. 1991. Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol. 5:664–673.Google Scholar
Crotser, M. P. and Masiunas, J. B. 1998. The effect of weed-free period and nitrogen on eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) competition with English pea (Pisum sativum). Hort. Sci. 33:88–91.Google Scholar
Crotser, M. P. and Witt, W. W. 2000. Effect of Glycine max canopy characteristics, G. max interference, and weed-free period on Solanum ptycanthum growth. Weed Sci. 48:20–26.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Barkdoll, A. W., and Davis, J. R. 1991. Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum coccodes isolates to potato (Solanum tuberosum) and two nightshade (Solanum spp.) species. Weed Technol. 5:570–574.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Schaffers, W. C. 1992. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with bentazon plus additives. Weed Technol. 6:85–90.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428–435.Google Scholar
González-Ponce, R. G., Zancada, C., Verdugo, M., and Salas, L. 1996. Plant height as a factor in competition between black nightshade and two horticultural crops (tomato and pepper). J. Hort. Sci. 71:453–460.Google Scholar
Hermanutz, L. A. and Weaver, S. E. 1991. Germination and growth of Solanum ptycanthum and Solanum sarrachoides . Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:167–174.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1995. Plant responses to light: a potential tool for weed management. Weed Sci. 43:474–482.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. 2005. Outlook herbicide for weed control in potatoes. CIS 1126. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Education Communications. 4 p.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. 2007. A comparison of flumioxazin and rimsulfuron tank mixtures for weed control in potato. Weed Technol. 21:1023–1028.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Beutler, B. R., and Hancock, D. M. 2006. Desiccant evaluations: late-season hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control and seed response. Weed Technol. 20:37–40.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. and Eberlein, C. V. 2003. Weed management. Pages 241–283 in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Agriculture Communications.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Eberlein, C. V., Kral, C. W., and Guttieri, M. J. 2005a. Using Matrix in weed management systems for potatoes. CIS 1037. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Education Communications. 8 p.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Eberlein, C. V., and Tonks, D. J. 2004. Broadleaf weed control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop safety with postemergence rimsulfuron, metribuzin, and adjuvant combinations. Weed Technol. 18:750–756.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Ransom, C. V., Boydston, R. A., and Beutler, B. R. 2005b. Dimethenamid-p: weed control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety tolerance. Weed Technol. 19:966–971.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Tonks, D. J., and Beutler, B. R. 2003. Efficacy and economics of weed control programs in glyphosate-resistant potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 17:854–865.Google Scholar
Ivany, J. A. 1986. Quackgrass competition effect on potato yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:185–187.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, Z. A. 1995. Emergence and Growth of Common Annual Weeds Under Varied Levels of Shade. , University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 92 pp.Google Scholar
Liebman, M., Drummond, F. A., Corson, S., and Zhang, J. 1996. Tillage and rotation crop effects on weed dynamics in potato production systems. Agron. J. 88:18–26.Google Scholar
Love, S. L., Eberlein, C. V., Stark, J. C., and Bohl, W. H. 1995. Cultivar and seedpiece spacing effects on potato variety competitiveness with weeds. Am. J. Potato Res. 72:197–213.Google Scholar
Love, S. L., Novy, R., Corsini, D. L., and Bain, P. 2003. Variety selection and management. Pages 21–47 in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID University of Idaho Agriculture Communications.Google Scholar
McGiffen, M. E. Jr., Masiunas, J. B., and Hesketh, J. D. 1992. Competition for light between tomatoes and nightshades (Solanum nigrum or S. ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 40:220–226.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W. and Parker, R. 2006. Nightshade biology and control in the Pacific Northwest. PNW 0588. Extension and Station Communications. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University. 8 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1989. Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 37:228–232.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Thoreson, M. C. 1981. Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and weeds. Weed Sci. 29:672–677.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:25–58.Google Scholar
Park, S. E., Benjamin, L. R., and Watkinson, A. R. 2003. The theory and application of plant competition models: an agronomic perspective. Ann. Bot. 92:741–748.Google Scholar
Quakenbush, L. S. and Andersen, R. N. 1984. Distribution and biology of two nightshades (Solanum spp.) in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 32:529–533.Google Scholar
Raby, B. J. and Binning, L. K. 1985. Weed competition and study in ‘Russet Burbank’ and ‘Superior'potato (Solanum tuberosum) with different management practices. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:4 p.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Boddrell, J. E. 1983. Field emergence and temperature requirements for germination in Solanum sarrachoides Sendt. Weed Res. 23:247–252.Google Scholar
Saghir, A. R. and Markoullis, G. 1974. Effects of weed competition and herbicides on yield and quality of potatoes. Proc. British Weed Control Conf. 12:533–539.Google Scholar
Sattin, M., Zuin, M. C., and Sartorato, I. 1994. Light quality beneath field-grown maize, soybean, and wheat canopies—red:far red variations. Physiol. Plant. 91:322–328.Google Scholar
Selleck, G. W. and Dallyn, S. L. 1978. Herbicide treatments and potato cultivar interactions for weed control. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. Proc. 32:152–156.Google Scholar
Singh, R. D., Gupta, R. K., Venugropal, K., and Singh, G. B. Undated. Evaluation of weed free maintenance for mustard and potato in Sikkim. Proc. Indian Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 69 p.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R. and Alvarez, J. M. 2008. Hairy nightshade as a potential Potato leafroll virus (Luteoviridae: Polerovirus) inoculum source in Pacific Northwest potato ecosystems. Phytopathology. 98:985–991.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, R., Alvarez, J. M., Eigenbrode, S. D., and Bosque-Perez, N. A. 2006. Influence of hairy nightshade Solanum sarrachoides (Sendtner) and Potato leafroll virus (Luteoviridae: Polerovirus) on the host preference of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 35:546–553.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989a. Effects on shading and soybean (Glycine max L.) interference in Solanum ptycanthum Dunal (eastern black nightshade) growth and development. Weed Res. 29:307–316.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Myers, R. A. 1989b. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci. 37:570–574.Google Scholar
Sweet, R. D. and Sieczka, J. B. 1973. Comments on ability of potato varieties to compete with weeds. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 27:302–304.Google Scholar
Thakral, K. K., Pandita, M. L., Khurana, S. C., and Kalloo, G. 1989. Effect of time of weed removal on growth and yield of potato. Weed Res. 29:33–38.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. E. and Witt, W. W. 1987. Germination of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata), smooth groundcherry (Physalis virginiana), and eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Weed Sci. 35:58–62.Google Scholar
Vangessel, M. J. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci. 38:338–343.Google Scholar
Vitolo, D. B. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1985. Grass competition in white potatoes. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:25. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Webb, R. E., Wilson, D. R., Shumaker, J. R., Graves, B., Henniger, M. R., Watts, J., Frank, J. A., and Murphy, H. J. 1978. Atlantic: a new potato variety with high solids, good processing, and resistance to pests. Am. Potato J. 55:141–145.Google Scholar
Weigelt, A. and Jolliffe, P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. J. Ecol. 91:707–720.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Deckard, E. L., and Ahrens, W. H. 2005. Factors affecting germination of hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) seeds. Weed Sci. 53:41–45.Google Scholar