Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:05:57.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Reproduction of Benghal Dayflower (Commelina benghalensis) in Response to Drought Stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Theodore M. Webster  and
Timothy L. Grey
Theodore M. Webster*
Affiliation:
Crop Protection and Management Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soils Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate growth and reproduction of Benghal dayflower in response to daily (nondrought stress) and weekly (drought stress) irrigation. With daily irrigation, Benghal dayflower plants added one leaf per plant each week during the initial 6 wk of growth and then increased leaf number eightfold between the intervals of 6 and 10 wk after planting (WAP) and 10 and 15 WAP. By 15 WAP each plant had in excess of 400 leaves. Benghal dayflower plant height increased 2.4 cm wk−1 between 5 and 14 WAP, increasing eightfold during this interval, while plant width increased 20-fold. Aerial spathe formation began between 7 and 8 WAP, with 26 spathes maturing (containing seeds ready for dispersal) each week beginning at 11 WAP. In another study, the influence of duration of drought stress at intervals between 7 and 56 d on early growth and development of cotton and Benghal dayflower was evaluated. Benghal dayflower aboveground biomass was 3.5 times greater than cotton. There was an inverse linear relationship between aboveground biomass and duration of drought stress for cotton and Benghal dayflower, though there was a more rapid decline for Benghal dayflower. A final study evaluated Benghal dayflower response to weekly moisture regimes that approximated 13, 25, 50, and 100% of soil field capacity. Benghal dayflower aerial spathes were 4.6 times more numerous than subterranean spathes. Rate of seed production decreased in a linear manner with decreasing water volume, however, rate of subterranean seed production was less affected by water volume than was aerial seed production. These data indicate that Benghal dayflower thrives under high soil moisture regimes, but that drought stress inhibits growth and reproduction. Cotton appears to be more drought tolerant than Benghal dayflower. Judicious water use in cotton cropping systems in the southeastern United States could be an important component of multiple-tactic Benghal dayflower management program.

Keywords

Benghal dayflower, Commelina benghalensis L. COMBEcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.amphicarpic specieschasmogamous flowerscleistogamous flowerstropical spiderwortweed seed production
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 561 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adams, F., Burmester, C., Hue, N. V., and Long, F. L. 1982. A comparison of column displacement and centrifuge methods of obtaining soil solution. Soil Sci. Am. Proc. 44:733–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahanchede, A. 1996. Agronomic impacts of the dispersal of two morphological types of Commelina benghalensis L. in Benin. Pages 75–82. in. 10th International Symposium on the Biology of Weeds.Google Scholar
Brown, W. V. 1952. The relation of soil moisture to cleistogamy in Stipa leucotricha . Bot. Gaz. 113:438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Weed survey—southern states. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 27:215–249.Google Scholar
Budd, G. D., Thomas, P. E. L., and Allison, J. C. S. 1979. Vegetative regeneration, depth of germination and seed dormancy in Commelina benghalensis L. Rhodesian J. Agric. Res. 17:151–153.Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. 2004. A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers. Distrib. 10:387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. R., Goddard, R. H., Webster, T. M., Flanders, J. T., Culpepper, A. S., and Grey, T. L. 2006. Do mourning doves disperse seed of tropical spiderwort. in Butts, C. American Peanut Research and Education Society Proceedings. Savannah, GA American Peanut Research and Education Society. 85.Google Scholar
Cheplick, G. P. 1994. Life history evolution in amphicarpic plants. Plant Species Biol. 9:119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivinge, O. A. and Kawisi, M. 1989. The effect of node numbers in the regeneration of wandering jew (Commelina benghalensis L.). Zimbabwe J. Agric. Res. 27:131–138.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Flanders, J. T., York, A. C., and Webster, T. M. 2004. Tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) control in glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 18:432–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1995. Weed survey—southern states—broadleaf crops subsection. Pages 290–305. in Street, J. E. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1984. Weed survey—southern states. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 37:192–198.Google Scholar
Faden, R. B. 1993. The misconstrued and rare species of Commelina (Commelinaceae) in the eastern United States. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80:208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faden, R. B. 2000. Commelina. Pages 192–197. in Morin, N. R. Flora of North America, Vol. 22. New York Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. and Tomlinson, A. D. 2002. Genetic diversity and mating system comparisons between ray and disc achene seed pools of the heterocarpic species Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glantz, S. A. and Slinker, B. K. 2001. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill, Medical Publications Division.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kaul, V., Koul, A. K., and Sharma, M. C. 2000. The underground flower. Curr. Sci. India. 78:39–44.Google Scholar
Kaul, V., Sharma, N., and Koul, A. K. 2002. Reproductive effort and sex allocation strategy in Commelina benghalensis L., a common monsoon weed. Bot. J. Linnean Soc. 140:403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. Y. 1998. Growth and development of Commelina benghalensis L. from four seed types. Kor. J. Weed Sci. 18:42–47.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, P. and Maheshwari, J. K. 1955. Floral dimorphism in Commelina forskalaei Vahl. and C. benghalensis L. Phytomorphology. 5:413–422.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, P. and Singh, B. 1934. A preliminary note on the morphology of the aerial and underground flowers of Commelina benghalensis, Linn. Curr. Sci. India. 3:158–160.Google Scholar
Minter, T. C. and Lord, E. M. 1983. Effects of water stress, abscisic acid, and gibberellic acid on flower production and differentiation in the cleistogamous species Collomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 70:618–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandal, D. P. and Singh, C. M. 1993. Weed management in direct sown puddled rice-wheat cropping system integrated weed management for sustainable agriculture. Proceedings of the Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium. 3:57–61.Google Scholar
Pancho, J. V. 1964. Seed sizes and production capabilities of common weed species in the rice fields of the Philippines. Philippine Agric. Sci. 48:307–316.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Culpepper, A. S., Webster, T. M., and Flanders, J. T. 2005. Tropical spiderwort identification and control in Georgia field crops. Tifton, GA University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin. Available at http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/c884.pdf.Google Scholar
Ritchie, G. L., Bednarz, C. W., Jost, P. H., and Brown, S. M. 2007. Cotton growth and development. Bulletin 1252. http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/B1252.pdf. Accessed: February 25, 2008.Google Scholar
Santos, I. C., Ferreira, F. A., Miranda, G. V., and Santos, L. D. T. 2001. Germination of aerial and underground seeds of Commelina benghalensis . Planta Daninha. 19:163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steptoe, P. J., Vencill, W. K., and Grey, T. L. 2006. Influence of moisture stress on herbicidal control of an invasive weed, Benghal dayflower (Commelina benghalensis). Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. 20 (Spec. Iss):907–914.Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Resources Conservation Service 1999. Georgia soil survey. Athens, GA USDA-NRCS.Google Scholar
Walker, S. R. and Evenson, J. P. 1985. Biology of Commelina benghalensis L. in south-eastern Queensland. 1. Growth, development and seed production. Weed Res. 25:239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, D. M. 1980. Environmental determinants of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Evolution. 34:747–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. 54:244–259.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2005. Weed survey—southern states: Broadleaf crops subsection. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. 58:291–306.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Burton, M. G., Culpepper, A. S., Flanders, J. T., Grey, T. L., and York, A. C. 2006. Tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis) control and emergence patterns in preemergence herbicide systems. J. Cot. Sci. 10:68–75.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Burton, M. G., Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., and Prostko, E. P. 2005a. Tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis): a tropical invader threatens agroecosystems of the southern United States. Weed Technol. 19:501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M., Culpepper, A. S., Flanders, J. T., and Grey, T. L. 2005b. Planting date affects critical tropical spiderwort (Commelina benghalensis)-free interval in cotton. Pages 2842–2843. in Grey, T. L. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, Cotton Weed Science Research Conference.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Faircloth, W. H., Flanders, J. T., Prostko, E. P., and Grey, T. L. 2007. The critical period of Bengal dayflower (Commelina bengalensis) control in peanut. Weed Sci. 55:359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and MacDonald, G. E. 2001. A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol. 15:771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, A. K. 1981. Commelinaceae—a review of the distribution, biology and control of the important weeds belonging to this family. Trop. Pest Manag. 27:405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeide, B. 1978. Reproductive behavior of plants in time. Am. Nat. 112:636–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar