Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:56:49.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Resistant Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) Populations also Exhibit Resistance to Glufosinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wilson V. Avila-Garcia  and
Carol Mallory-Smith
Wilson V. Avila-Garcia*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Bldg., Corvallis, OR 97331
Carol Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Bldg., Corvallis, OR 97331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Resistance to glufosinate has been confirmed in glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass populations collected in hazelnut orchards in Oregon. Dose–response, ammonia accumulation, and enzyme activity studies were conducted to test the sensitivity of three glyphosate-resistant and three susceptible Italian ryegrass populations to glufosinate. The glufosinate rates required to reduce the growth by 50% (GR50) were 0.15, 0.18, and 0.21 for the control populations C1, C2, and C3, respectively, whereas for the resistant populations OR1, OR2, and OR3, the GR50 values were 0.49, 0.42, and 0.40 kg ai ha−1, respectively, exhibiting an average resistance index of 2.4. The same trend was observed in ammonia accumulation studies between 48 and 96 h after glufosinate treatment where the susceptible populations accumulated on average two times more ammonia than the resistant populations. The glufosinate concentration required to reduce the glutamine synthetase enzyme activity by 50% (I50) was not different for the resistant and susceptible populations. The I50s ranged from 3.1 to 3.6 µM for the resistant populations and from 3.7 to 4.3 µM for the susceptible populations; therefore, an insensitive target site is not responsible for the glufosinate resistance.

Keywords

GlufosinateglyphosateItalian ryegrass, Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot LOLMUhazelnut, Corylus avellana LGlutamine synthetaseammonia accumulationherbicide resistance
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 305 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77–88.Google Scholar
Devine, M., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis. Pages 253–262 in Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
D'Hallauin, K., DeBlock, J., Janssens, J., Leemans, J., Reynaerts, A., and Botterman, J. 1992. The bar gene as a selectable marker in plant engineering. Methods Enzymol. 216:415–441.Google Scholar
Dinelli, G., Marotti, I., Catizone, P., Bonetti, A., Urbano, J. M., and Barnes, J. 2008. Physiological and molecular basis of glyphosate resistance in C. bonariensis (L.) Cronq. biotypes from Spain. Weed Res. 48:257–265.Google Scholar
Everman, W., Mayhew, C., Burton, J., York, A., and Wilcut, J. 2009a. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant corn, goosegrass (Eleusine indica), large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 57:1–5.Google Scholar
Everman, W., Thomas, W., Burton, J., York, A., and Wilcut, J. 2009b. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton, Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa). Weed Sci. 57:357–361.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2011. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: March 23, 2011.Google Scholar
Hoskins, A., Young, B., Krausz, R., and Russin, J. 2005. Control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in winter wheat. Weed Technol. 19:261–265.Google Scholar
Jalaludin, A., Ngim, J., Bakar, B., and Alias, Z. 2010. Preliminary findings of potentially resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to glufosinate-ammonium in Malaysia. Weed Biol. Manag. 10:256–260.Google Scholar
Jones, C., Chandler, J., Morrison, J., Senseman, S., and Tingle, C. 2001. Glufosinate combination and row spacing for weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:141–147.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Streibig, J. C., and Ritz, C. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose–response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol. 21:840–848.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H. and Reddy, K. N. 2005. Role of absorption and translocation in the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 53:84–89.Google Scholar
Manderscheid, R. 1993. Irreversible inhibition of glutamine synthetase from higher plants by the herbicide phosphinothricin. Pages 103–107 in Böger, P., and Sandman, G., eds. Target Site Assays for Modern Herbicides and Related Phytotoxic Compounds. Boca Raton, FL Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Perez, A., Alister, C., and Kogan, M. 2004. Absorption, translocation and allocation of glyphosate in resistant and susceptible Chilean biotypes of Lolium multiflorum . Weed Biol. Manag. 4:56–58.Google Scholar
Perez-Jones, A., Park, K. W., Colquhoun, J., Mallory-Smith, C., and Shaner, D. 2005. Identification of glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Oregon. Weed Sci. 53:775–779.Google Scholar
Perez-Jones, A., Park, K. W., Polge, N., Colquhoun, J., and Mallory-Smith, C. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of glyphosate resistance in Lolium multiflorum . Planta. 226:395–404.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. and Hurle, K. 2000. Influence of climatic conditions and plant physiology on glufosinate-ammonium efficacy. Weed Res. 41:31–39.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Wu, J., and Hatzios, K. K. 1999. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci. 47:636–643.Google Scholar
Pornprom, T., Chompoo, J., and Grace, B. 2003. Glufosinate tolerance in hybrid corn varieties based on decreasing ammonia accumulation. Weed Biol. Manag. 3:41–45.Google Scholar
Pornprom, T., Prodmatee, N., and Chatchawankanphanich, O. 2009. Glutamine synthetase mutation conferring target-site based resistance to glufosinate in soybean cell selection. Pest. Manag. Sci. 65:216–222.Google Scholar
Pornprom, T., Surawattananon, S., and Srinives, P. 2000. Ammonia accumulation as an index of glufosinate-tolerant soybean cell lines. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 68:102–106.Google Scholar
Ray, T. 1989. Herbicides as inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis. Pages 106–107 in Böger, P., and Sandman, G., eds. Target Sites of Herbicide Action. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Sankula, S., Braverman, M., and Oard, J. 1998. Genetic analysis of glufosinate resistance in crosses between transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 12:209–214.Google Scholar
Sellers, B. A., Smeda, R. J., and Li, J. 2004. Glutamine synthetase activity and ammonia accumulation is influenced by time of glufosinate application. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 78:9–20.Google Scholar
Seng, C. T., Lun, L. V., San, C. T., and Sahid, I. B. 2010. Initial report of glufosinate and paraquat multiple resistance that evolved in a biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Malaysia. Weed Biol. Manag. 10:229–233.Google Scholar
Skora-Neto, F., Coble, H., and Corbin, F. 2000. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glufosinate in Xantium strumarium, Commelina diffusa, and Ipomoea purpurea . Weed Sci. 48:171–175.Google Scholar
Steckel, J., Hart, S., and Wax, L. 1997. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45:378–381.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose–response curves and statistical models. Pages 29–56 in Streibig, J. C., and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Tachibana, K., Watanabe, T., Sekizawa, Y., and Takematsu, T. 1986. Accumulation of ammonia in plants treated with bialaphos. J. Pestic. Sci. 11:33–37.Google Scholar
Tsai, C. J., Wang, C. S., and Wang, C. Y. 2006. Physiological characteristics of glufosinate resistance in rice. Weed Sci. 54:634–640.Google Scholar
Tucker, K., Morgan, G., Senseman, S., Miller, T., and Baumann, P. 2006. Identification, distribution and control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) ecotypes with varying levels of sensitivity to triasulfuron in Texas. Weed Technol. 20:745–750.Google Scholar
Wakelin, A. M., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., and Preston, C. 2004. Glyphosate resistance in four different populations of Lolium rigidum as associated with reduced translocation of glyphosate to meristematic zones. Weed Res. 44:453–459.Google Scholar
Wakelin, A M. and Preston, C. 2006. A target-site mutation is present in a glyphosate-resistant Lolium rigidum population. Weed Res. 46:432–440.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, M. 1967. Phenol-hypochloride reaction for ammonia. Anal. Chem. 39:971–974.Google Scholar