Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:44:22.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of rice by-products for weed control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yong-In Kuk
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

Abstract

Rice by-products were evaluated in the greenhouse for herbicidal activity on various weeds and crops. Rice by-products and corn gluten meal (CG) were applied at 0, 125, 250, 500, and 750 g m−2 preemergence (PRE) and preplant incorporated (PPI). The efficacy of rice by-products and CG in reducing weed emergence and shoot weight of broadleaf species was in the order of medium-grain fatty rice bran (MF) > long-grain fatty rice bran (LF) > CG > defatted rice bran (DF) > long-grain hull (LH) > medium-grain hull (MH). For reducing grass emergence, MF = CG > LF > DF > LH > MH, and for shoot weight reduction, CG > MF > LF > LH > DF = MH. Palmer amaranth and ivyleaf morningglory were the most susceptible weeds (91 and 82%) followed by sicklepod, hemp sesbania, and prickly sida (65 to 70%). Velvetleaf was the most tolerant broadleaf weed. Grasses were not as susceptible to rice bran as broadleaf weeds. In general, MF was the best material for reducing weed emergence and its efficacy was not affected by application method. Cotton and corn were the most tolerant direct-seeded crops to MF (6% reduction in plant stand), and soybean, Italian ryegrass, tomato, and rice had intermediate tolerances (30 to 86% stand reduction). Mustard, cucumber, and lettuce were the most susceptible crops (71 to 98% reduction in plant survival). The minimum effective rate was 250 g m−2 MF PPI or PRE.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Balogh, J.C. and Anderson, J. L. 1992. Environmental impacts of turfgrass pesticides. Pages 221354. In Balogh, J. C. and Walker, W. J., eds. Golf Course Management and Construction—Environmental Issues. Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
Barber, S. and De Barber, C. B. 1980. Rice bran: chemistry and technology. Pages 790862. In Luh, B. S., ed. Rice: Production and Utilization. Westport, CT: Avi Publishing.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale). Weed Sci. 34:384390.Google Scholar
Bingaman, B. R. and Christians, N. E. 1995. Greenhouse screening of corn gluten meal as a natural control product for broadleaf and grass weeds. HortScience 30:12561259.Google Scholar
Bradow, J. M. and Connick, W. J. Jr. 1990. Volatile seed germination inhibitors from plant residues. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:645666.Google Scholar
Chou, C. H. 1982. Allelopathy in Agroecosystems in Taiwan. Taipei, Taiwan: Academica Sinica, Institute of Botany Annual Report. pp. 79.Google Scholar
Chou, C. H. and Lin, H. J. 1976. Autointoxication mechanism of Oryza sativa . I. Phytotoxic effects of decomposing rice residues in soil. J. Chem. Ecol. 2:353367.Google Scholar
Christians, N. E., inventor; Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc., assignee. 1991. Preemergence weed control using corn gluten meal. U.S. patent 5,030,268.Google Scholar
Christians, N. E. 1993. The use of corn gluten meal as a natural preemergence weed control in turf. Pages 284290 In Carrow, R. N., Christians, N. E., and Shearman, R. C., eds. International Turfgrass Society Research Journal. Overland Park, KS: Intertec.Google Scholar
Chung, I. M., Kim, K. H., Ahn, J. K., and Ju, H. J. 1997. Allelopathic potential evaluation of rice varieties on Echinochloa crus-galli . Kor. J. Weed Sci. 17:5258.Google Scholar
Dilday, R. H., Frans, R. E., Semidey, N., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Weed control with allelopathic rice. Ark. Farm Res. 41:1415.Google Scholar
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 1964. Rice bran: utilization and trade. FAO Mon. Bull. Agric. Econ. Stat. 13:914.Google Scholar
Hileman, B. 1990. Alternative agricultural methods, though still used by a minority of farmers, are attracting more attention, and a number of adherents. Chem. Eng. News 68:2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, M., Sugiyama, M., Hatakeyama, Y., Kuroda, E., and Murata, T. 1998. Effect of the application of rice bran on the carbohydrate metabolism in leaves and stems of rice variety Hitomebore cultured with the practice of no nitrogen application at basal dressing accompanied with sparse planting. Jpn. Crop Sci. 67:208215.Google Scholar
Houston, D. F. 1972. Rice bran and polish. Pages 272300 In Houston, D. F., ed. Rice: Chemistry and Technology. St. Paul, MN: First American Association of Cereal Chemistry.Google Scholar
Kim, B. K., Lee, D. J., Kim, B. K., and Lee, D. J. 1996. Varietal difference of viviparity and germination-inhibition of rice hull extracts. Korean Crop Sci. 41:434440.Google Scholar
Lax, A. R., Shepherd, H. S., and Edwards, J. V. 1988. Tentoxin a chlorosis-inducing toxin for Alternaría as a potential herbicide. Weed Technol. 2:540544.Google Scholar
Lee, C. W., Kim, J. C., Chang, Y. H., and Youn, K. B. 1991. Allelopathic effect of barley and rice straw on weed growth. Korean J. Weed Sci. 11:122127.Google Scholar
Lehle, F. R. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Quantification of allelopathic potential of sorghum residues by novel indexing of Richards’ function fitted to cumulative cress seed germination curves. Plant Physiol. 69:12121216.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1983. Inhibition of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.) and certain other weed species by phytotoxic components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:10271040.Google Scholar
Liu, D. L. and Christians, N. E. 1994. Isolation and identification of root-inhibiting compounds from corn gluten hydrolysate. J. Plant Growth Reg. 13:227230.Google Scholar
Lydon, J. and Duke, S. O. 1987. Progress toward natural herbicides from plants. Herbs, Spices, Med. Plants Dig. 5:14.Google Scholar
Nonnecke, G. R. and Christians, N. E. 1993. Evaluation of corn gluten meal as a natural weed control product in strawberry. Acta Hortic. 348:315320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, E. L. 1984. Allelopathy. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, pp. 6773.Google Scholar
Steinsiek, J. W., Oliver, L. R., and Collins, F. C. 1982. Allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw on selected weed species. Weed Sci. 30:495497.Google Scholar
Tamak, J. C., Narwal, S. S., Singh, L., and Ram, M. 1994a. Effect of aqueous extracts of rice stubbles and straw + stubbles on the germination and seedling growth of Convolvulus arvensis, Avena ludoviciana, and Phalaris minor . Crop Res. 8:186189.Google Scholar
Tamak, J. C., Narwal, S. S., Singh, L., and Singh, I. 1994b. Effect of aqueous extracts of rice stubbles and straw + stubbles on the germination and seedling growth of wheat, oat, berseen, and lentil. Crop Res. 8:180186.Google Scholar
Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 269 p.Google Scholar
Young, C.C., Zhu Thourne, L. R., and Waller, G. R. 1989. Phytotoxic potential of soils and wheat straw in rice rotation cropping systems of subtropical Taiwan. Plant Soil 120:95101.Google Scholar
Zarcinas, B. A., Cartwright, B., and Spouncer, L. R. 1987. Nitric acid digestion and multi-element analysis of plant material by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 18:131146.Google Scholar