Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:16:45.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing the margin of selectivity of RPA 201772 in Zea mays with antidotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325

Abstract

The antidotes dichlormid, MON-4660, CGA-154281, R-29148, and MON-13900 were tested in the greenhouse to protect Zea mays L. (corn) against RPA 201772 injury. High rates of RPA 201772 injured four Z. mays hybrids > 30%. R-29148 and MON-13900 were the most effective of the five antidotes evaluated. R-29148 applied at rates ⩾ 45 g ha−1 provided excellent protection against RPA 201772 injury and also prevented injury to Z. mays from diketonitrile, the active metabolite of RPA 201772. In laboratory studies, R-29148 did not alter absorption of 14C-RPA 201772 from soil; however, R-29148 significantly enhanced the rate of RPA 201772 metabolism and inactivation in Z. mays. The mixed function oxidase inhibitor piperonyl butoxide (PBO) increased RPA 201772 injury on all hybrids. These results demonstrate that Z. mays tolerance to RPA 201772 can be enhanced with the use of antidotes such as R-29148 and MON-13900, that R-29148 protects Z. mays from RPA 201772 and diketonitrile by the enhancement of metabolism, and that oxidative reactions may be involved in the metabolism of RPA 201772 in Z. mays.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. and Prostak, R. G. 1996. Activity of EXP 31130A in annual weed control in field corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:13.Google Scholar
Curvey, S. E. and Kapusta, G. 1996. Corn weed control with EXP31130A. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:5758.Google Scholar
Fonne-Pfister, R., Gaudin, J., Kruez, K., Ramisteiner, K., and Ebert, E. 1990. Hydroxylation of primisulfuron by an inducible cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase systems from maize. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37:165173.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Efficacy of Isoxaflutole alone and in combinations in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:81.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. 1997. Regulation of xenobiotic degrading enzymes with herbicide safeners. Pages 275288 in Hatzios, K. K., ed. Regulation of Enzymatic Systems Detoxifying Xenobiotics in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Hoffman, O. L. 1962. Chemical seed treatments as herbicide antidotes. Weeds 10:32.Google Scholar
Kotoula-Syka, E. and Hatzios, K. K. 1996. Interactions of tribenuron with four safeners and piperonyl butoxide on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:215218.Google Scholar
Kreuz, K. 1993. Herbicide safeners: recent advances and biochemical aspects of their mode of action. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3:12491258.Google Scholar
Leavitt, J.R.C. and Penner, D. 1978. Potential antidotes against acetanilide herbicide injury to corn (Zea mays). Weed Res. 18:281286.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L., Prisbylla, M. P., Cromartie, T. H., Dagarin, D. P., Howard, S. W., Provan, W. M., Ellis, M. K., Fraser, T., and Mutter, L. C. 1997. The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Weed Sci. 45:601609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, B. M. and Pallett, K. E. 1996. Isoxaflutole for weed control in maize. Pestic. Outlook 29–32.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Vrabel, T. E., Paulsgroves, M. D., Cramp, S., Cain, P., Gamblin, A., and Millet, J. C. 1994. RPA 201772: a new broad spectrum preemergence herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:5758.Google Scholar
Mosier, D. G., Duckworth, W., Watteyne, K. K., King, L. L., and Wrucke, M. A. 1995. Efficacy of EXP31130A in conventional and no-till corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:74.Google Scholar
Novosel, K. M. 1997. Efficacy of Annual Grass Control by Metolachlor as Influenced by Flumetsulam, Halosulfuron, and Chlorimuron-Ethyl. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, pp. 4384.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., Slack, C. H., Martin, J. R., and Witt, W. W. 1995. Evaluations of EXP31130A—a new preemergence corn herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:25.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:113124.Google Scholar
Rowe, L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1991. Efficacy and mode of action of CGA-154281, a protectant for corn (Zea mays) from metolachlor injury. Weed Sci. 39:7882.Google Scholar
Rubin, B., Leavitt, J.R.C., Penner, D., and Saettler, A. W. 1980. Interaction of antioxidants with ozone and herbicide stress. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 25:623629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simarmata, M. and Penner, D. 1993. Protection from primisulfuron injury to corn (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) with herbicide safeners. Weed Technol. 7:174179.Google Scholar
Simkins, G. S., Lengkeek, V. H., Duckworth, W., and Vrabel, T. E. 1995. Effect of application timing on performance of EXP31130A for field corn weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci, Soc. 50:25.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1996. Weed control and corn tolerance with isoxaflutole. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:50.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L. and Penner, D. 1998. Basis for differential tolerance of four corn hybrids to isoxaflutole. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:94.Google Scholar
Veilleux, D. P., Lavoy, J. D., Duckworth, W., and Christian, M. L. 1995. Efficacy of EXP31130A tank mixtures in conventional and no-till corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:75.Google Scholar
Viviani, F., Little, J. P., and Pallett, K. E. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. II. Characterization of the inhibition of carrot 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase by the diketonitrile derivative of isoxaflutole. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrabel, T. E., Jensen, J. O., Wrucke, M. A., and Hicks, C. 1995. EXP31130A: a new preemergent herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:2425.Google Scholar
Wrucke, M. A., King, L. L., and Veilleux, D. P. 1997. Effect of cultivation on performance of isoxaflutole in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:17.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1998. Performance of preemergence applications of isoxaflutole in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:124.Google Scholar