Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:26:41.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Weed Density and Defoliated or Undefoliated Soybeans (Glycine max) on Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Randall A. Higgins
Affiliation:
Study conducted at Iowa State Univ. Dep. of Entomol., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
David W. Staniforth
Affiliation:
Study conducted at Iowa State Univ. Plant Path., Seed, and Weed Sci., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Larry P. Pedigo
Affiliation:
Study conducted at Iowa State Univ. Dep. of Entomol., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

Abstract

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic. ♯3 ABUTH) grown under monoculture consistently exceeded velvetleaf intercropped with soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. var. ‘Amsoy 71′] in leaf area, nodes with fully developed leaves, canopy width, branches, and number of capsules as early as 3, 3, 4, 5, and 8 weeks, respectively, after simultaneous emergence. Velvetleaf plants without soybean competition eventually developed over nine times the dry matter of velvetleaf intercropped with soybean. The only components of velvetleaf plants sampled which sometimes increased significantly when soybean was defoliated in a manner simulating damage caused by the green cloverworm (GCW) (Plathypena scabra F.) were leaf area, number of leaves, and number of main-stem nodes. Soybeans in Iowa are attacked by the GCW late enough in the growing season that velvetleaf surviving previous weed management efforts benefited only slightly.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bentley, S. and Whittaker, J. B. 1979. Effects of grazing by a chrysomelid beetle, Gastrophysa viridula, on competition between Rumex obtusifolius and Rumex crispus . J. Ecol. 67:7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Influence of time of planting and distance from the cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) row of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on competitiveness with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:568572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivation, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562565.Google Scholar
4. Buttery, B. R. 1969. Analysis of the growth of soybeans as affected by plant population and fertilizer. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49:675684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chandler, J. M. and Dale, J. E. 1974. Comparative growth of four Malvaceous species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:116117.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Res. 80.18 pp.Google Scholar
7. Hagood, E. S., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybeans (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729734.Google Scholar
8. Hammond, R. B. and Pedigo, L. P. 1981. Effects of artificial and insect defoliation on water loss from excised soybean leaves. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 54:331336.Google Scholar
9. Hammond, R. B., Pedigo, L. P., and Poston, F. L. 1979. Green cloverworm leaf consumption on green house and field soybean leaves and development of a leaf-consumption model. J. Econ. Entomol. 72:102107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hammond, R. B., Poston, F. L., and Pedigo, L. P. 1979. Growth of the green cloverworm and a thermal-unit system for development. Environ. Entomol. 8:639642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Hanway, J. J. 1966. How a corn plant develops. Iowa State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Rep. 48. 18 pp.Google Scholar
12. Harper, J. L. and Gajic, D. 1961. Experimental studies on the mortality and plasticity of a weed. Weed Res. 1:91104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Higgins, R. A., Pedigo, L. P., and Staniforth, D. W. 1983. Selected preharvest morphological characteristics of soybeans stressed by simulated green cloverworm defoliation and velvetleaf competition. J. Econ. Entomol. 76:484491.Google Scholar
14. Higgins, R. A., Pedigo, L. P., Staniforth, D. W., and Anderson, I. C. 1984. Partial growth analysis of soybeans stressed by simulated green cloverworm defoliation and velvetleaf competition. Crop Sci. 24:289293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Jaffe, M. J. and Biro, R. 1979. Thigmomorphogenesis: The effect of mechanical perturbation on the growth of plants, with special reference to anatomical changes, the role of ethylene, and interaction with other environmental stresses. Pages 2551 in Mussell, H. and Staples, R. C., eds. Stress physiology in crop plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
16. Kalu, B. A. and Fick, G. W. 1981. Quantifying morphological development of alfalfa for studies of herbage quality. Crop Sci. 21:267271.Google Scholar
17. Norris, R. F. 1982. Interactions between weeds and other pests in the agro-ecosystem. Pages 343406 in Hatfield, J. L. and Thomason, I. J., eds., Biometeorology in Integrated Pest Mangement. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
18. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482488.Google Scholar
19. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Pedigo, L. P., Higgins, R. A., Hammond, R. B., and Bechinski, E. J. 1981. Soybean pest management. Pages 417537 in Pimentel, D., ed. Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture. Vol. 3. C. R.C. Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
21. Pedigo, L. P., Stone, J. D., and Lentz, G. L. 1973. Biological synopsis of the green cloverworm in central Iowa. J. Econ. Entomol. 66:665673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Poston, F. L., Pedigo, L. P., Pearce, R. B., and Hammond, R. B. 1976. Effects of artificial and insect defoliation on soybean net photosynthesis. J. Econ. Entomol. 69:109112.Google Scholar
23. Radford, P. J. 1967. Growth analysis formulae–Their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7:171175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Shibles, R. M., Anderson, I. C., and Gibson, A. H. 1975. Soybean. Pages 151190 in Evans, L. T., ed. Crop Physiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
25. Thomas, G. D., Ignoffo, C. M., Smith, D. B., and Morgan, C. E. 1978. Effects of single and sequential defoliations on yield and quality of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 71:871874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Trenbath, B. R. and Harper, J. L. 1973. Neighbour effects in the genus Avena I. Comparison of crop species. J. Appl. Ecol. 10:379399.Google Scholar
27. Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. Ann. Bot. 11:4176.Google Scholar