Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:38:33.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Small Broomrape (Orobanche Minor) on Red Clover Growth and Dry Matter Partitioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan D. Lins*
Affiliation:
Former Research Assistant, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
Jed B. Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Former Research Assistant, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Former Research Assistant, Associate Professor, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Small broomrape is a parasite of several broadleaf plant species. Consequences of small broomrape infestation in host cropping systems include seed contamination, reduction in crop seed yield, and host plant death. The effect of small broomrape parasitism on the biomass partitioning of its primary host, red clover, has not been documented. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the relationship between small broomrape and red clover biomass accumulation. Total biomass of parasitized red clover plants was 15 to 51% less than nonparasitized red clover plants. Small broomrape parasitism reduced the amount of dry matter allocated to red clover inflorescences by 50 to 80%. Small broomrape dry matter accumulation was strongly related to total red clover–small broomrape dry matter accumulation. Small broomrape attachment number per red clover plant was a poor indicator of relative small broomrape dry weight accumulation. The results of this study indicated that small broomrape accumulated resources from red clover at the greatest expense to the economically important reproductive tissues.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barker, E. R., Press, M. C., Scholes, J. D., and Quick, W. P. 1996. Interactions between parasitic angiosperm Orobanche aegyptiaca and its tomato host: growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 133:637642.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J. B., Eizenberg, H., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2006. Herbicide placement site affects small broomrape (Orobanche minor) control in red clover (Trifolium pratense). Weed Technol. 20:356360.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J. B. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2001. Clover broomrape management with fumigation and herbicides. Seed Prod. Res. Ext/CrS. 121:4748.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J. B., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Suverly, L. 2001. Distribution and importance of Orobanche minor in Oregon. in Fer, A., Thalouran, P., Joel, D.M., Musselman, L.J., Parker, C., Verkleij, J.A.C. eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium. 20.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2005. A predictive degree-days model for small broomrape (Orobanche minor) parasitism in red clover in Oregon. Weed Sci. 53:3740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Kleifeld, Y., Plakhine, D., and Rubin, B. 1997. Variation in vetch (Vicia spp.) response to Orobanche aegyptiaca . Weed Sci. 45:756762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibberd, J. M., Quick, W. P., Press, M. C., and Scholes, J. D. 1998. Can source-sink relations explain responses of tobacco to infection by the root holoparasitic angiosperm Orobanche cernua? Plant Cell Environ. 21:333340.Google Scholar
Manschadi, A. M., Kroschel, J., and Sauerborn, J. 1996. Dry matter production and partitioning in the host–parasite association Vicia faba–Orobanche crenata . J. Appl. Bot. 70:224229.Google Scholar
Oerke, E-W., Dehne, H-W., Schonbeck, F., and Weber, A. 1994. Crop Production and Crop Protection. Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Amsterdam Elsevier. 372387.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. 1993. Orobanche species: the broomrapes. in. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. 111164. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Romanova, V., Terryokhin, E., and Wegmann, K. 2001. Investigation of intraspecific taxonomy in Orobanche cernua Loefl. by the method of biological tests. In Fer, A., Thalouran, P., Joel, D.M., Musselman, L.J., Parker, C., Verkleij, J.A.C. eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Nantes, France. 80.Google Scholar
Ross, K. C., Colquhoun, J. B., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2004. Small broomrape (Orobanche minor) germination and early development in response to plant species. Weed Sci. 52:260266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 3884.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J. 1991. The economic importance of the phyto-parasites Orobanche and Striga . Pages 137143. in Ransom, J.K., Musselman, L.J., Worsham, A.D., Parker, C. eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Parasitic Weeds, CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Steiner, J. J., Leffel, J. A., Gingrich, G., and Aldrich-Markham, S. 1995. Red clover seed production: III. Effect of herbage removal time under varied environments. Crop Sci. 35:16671675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zehhar, N., Ingouff, M., Bouya, D., and Fer, A. 2002. Possible involvement of gibberellins and ethylene in Orobanche ramosa germination. Weed Res. 42:464469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar