Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:26:03.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Critical Period of Weed Control for Lentil in Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L. K. Fedoruk ,
E. N. Johnson  and
S. J. Shirtliffe
L. K. Fedoruk
Affiliation:
BASF Canada, 1-411 Downey Rd., Saskatoon, SK S7N 4L8, Canada
E. N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Scott Research Farm, P.O. Box 10, Scott, SK S0K 4A0, Canada
S. J. Shirtliffe*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed control in lentil is difficult because lentil is a poor competitor with weeds and few POST broadleaf herbicides are available. Imadazolinone-tolerant lentils have more herbicide options, but the optimum timing for herbicide application is not known. The critical period of weed control (CPWC) is the period in a crop's life cycle when weeds must be controlled in order to prevent yield loss. The objective of this research was to determine the CPWC for lentil. We made lentil remain weedy or weed-free from 0 to 11 aboveground nodes to investigate the durations of weed interference and weed-free period, respectively. It was found that lentil has a CPWC beginning at the five-node stage and continuing to the 10-node stage. There was an inverse relationship between weed biomass and lentil yield; that is, lentil yield was highest when weed biomass is minimal. We propose that the CPWC begins when weeds start to accumulate significant biomass and ends with crop canopy closure. Therefore, to maximize lentil yields, growers should consider using a POST residual herbicide that can control weeds during the CPWC.

Keywords

Lentil, Lens culinaris L. ‘CDC Impact’Competitioncritical weed-free periodduration of interferencecritical timing of weed removalimidazolinone tolerantherbicide tolerant
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 517 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Acton, D. F., Padbury, G. A., and Stushnoff, C. T. 1998. Moist Mixed Grassland ecoregion. Pages 125–156 in Saskatchewan Environment and Resource Management, ed. The Ecoregions of Saskatchewan. Regina, SK, Canada Canadian Plains Research Center.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., Yenish, J. P., and Alby, T. III. 2003. Effect of imazamox soil persistence on dryland rotational crops. Weed Technol. 17:161–165.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1998. Postemergence weed control in pea (Pisum sativum) with imazamox. Weed Technol. 12:64–68.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., O'Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., and Li, X. 2002. Beyond herbicides: new approaches to managing weeds. Pages 305–312 in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture for Dry Areas; Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. Lethbridge, AB, Canada Dobing Enterprises.Google Scholar
Cessna, A. J. 1997. Metribuzin residues in lentil following postemergence application. Can. J. Plant Sci. 78:167–169.Google Scholar
Chant, S. R. 2004. Imidazolinone Tolerance in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). . Saskatoon, SK, Canada University of Saskatchewan. 95 p.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Morrow, L. A., and Whitesides, R. E. 1987. Lentil (Lens culinaris) yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference. Weed Sci. 35:669–672.Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 2004. Canadian Climate Normals 1971 to 2000. Saskatoon Diefenbaker Airport. http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/climate_normals/stnselect_e.html. Accessed: December 18, 2008.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Arnold, R.L.B., Sanchez, R., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res. 67:123–139.Google Scholar
Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1986. Tolerance of early maturing soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:125–130.Google Scholar
Halford, C., Hamill, A. S., Zhang, J., and Doucet, C. 2001. Critical period of weed control in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:737–744.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., and Clayton, G. W. 2001. Timing of weed removal in field pea (Pisum sativum). Weed Technol. 15:277–283.Google Scholar
Hess, M., Barralis, G., Bleiholder, H., Buhrs, L., Eggers, T. H., Hack, H., and Stauss, R. 1997. Use of the extended BBCH scale-general for the descriptions of the growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous weed species. Weed Res. 37:433–441.Google Scholar
Kasasian, L. and Seeyave, J. 1969. Critical periods for weed competition. Int. J. Pest Manage. Part A. 15:208–212.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. J., Harker, K. N., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1989. Influence of metribuzin and cyanazine on the phytotoxicity of graminicides on wild oats and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 68:195–203.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blakenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50:773–786.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., and Mainz, M. 2003. Row spacing influences the critical timing of weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:666–673.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Streibig, J. C., and Ritz, C. 2007. Utilizing R software package for dose–response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol. 21:840–848.Google Scholar
Martin, S. G., Van Acker, R. C., and Friesen, L. F. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49:326–333.Google Scholar
Mohamed, E. S., Nourai, A. H., Mohamed, G. E., Mohamed, M. I., and Saxena, M. C. 1997. Weeds and weed management in irrigated lentil in northern Sudan. Weed Res. 37:211–218.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, G., Javanshir, A., Khooie, F. R., Mohammadi, S. A., and Zehtab, S. 2005. Critical period of weed interference in chickpea. Weed Res. 45:57–63.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliveira, M. J. 2004. Comparison of the critical period of weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Sci. 52:802–807.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Version 2.7.0. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed: March 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J. S., and Ghersa, C. M. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley. P. 205.Google Scholar
Rajcan, I., Chandler, K. J., and Swanton, C. J. 2004. Red–far-red ratio of reflected light: a hypothesis of why early-season weed control is important in corn. Weed Sci. 52:774–778.Google Scholar
Sarker, A. and Erskine, W. E. 2006. Recent progress in ancient lentil. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 144:19–29.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide 9.1. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
[SMA] Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. 2008. Guide to Crop Protection. Regina, SK. 418 p.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers. 2000. Lentils. Pulse Production Manual. 2nd ed. Saskatoon SK. 18 p.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. and Hornford, R. 2005. Soil interactions of imidazolinone herbicides used in Canada. Pages 23–30 in Van Acker, R. C., ed. Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management. Topics in Canadian Weed Science. 3. Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Quebec Canadian Weed Science Society–Societe Canadienne de Malherbologie.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Saxena, M. C., Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Al-Thahabi, S. A., and Haddad, N. I. 1996. Estimation of the critical period of weed control. Weed Sci. 44:273–283.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2010. Canada: Pulse and Special Crops Outlook. 2010-01-28. http://www.agr.gc.ca/pol/mad-dam/index_e.php?s1=pubs&s2=spec&page=intro. Accessed: March 5, 2010.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Harker, K. N., and Anderson, R. L. 1993. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada. Weed Technol. 7:537–542.Google Scholar
Wall, D. A. and McMullan, P. M. 1994. Effectiveness of several new selective herbicides in lentils (Lens culinaris). Crop Prot. 13:553–557.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II. 2006. Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn. Weed Sci. 54:928–933.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed–Crop Competition: A Review. Corvallis, OR Integrated Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University. 220 p.Google Scholar