Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:02:23.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Effects of Three EPTC Antidotes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

F. Y. Chang ,
G. R. Stephenson  and
J. D. Bandeen
F. Y. Chang
Affiliation:
Dep. of Environmental Biology; Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
G. R. Stephenson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Environmental Biology; Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
J. D. Bandeen
Affiliation:
Dep. of Environmental Biology; Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In growth room studies, N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide (hereafter referred to as R-25788) was the most effective of three antidotes for the reduction of EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) injury to corn (Zea mays L. ‘United Hybrid 106’). R-25788 reduced EPTC injury to corn as a seed treatment, as an incorporated soil spray, or in nutrient solution in quartz sand nutrient culture. CDAA (N,N-diallyl-2-chloroacetamide) was also an EPTC antidote for corn when applied to the soil or in nutrient solution but was itself toxic to corn when applied as a seed treatment. The antidote 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (hereafter referred to as naphthalic anhydride) was less effective than R-25788 as a seed treatment and was ineffective when applied to the soil. Naphthalic anhydride was the only one of the three antidotes which also reduced EPTC toxicity to green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv.].

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , July 1973 , pp. 292 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1971. Protecting corn from herbicide injury by seed treatment. Weed Sci. 19:565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chang, F. Y., Bandeen, J. D., and Stephenson, G. R. 1972. A selective antidote for prevention of EPTC injury in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:707–714.Google Scholar
3. Ennis, W. B. Jr. 1964. Selective toxicity in herbicides. Weed Res. 4:93–104.Google Scholar
4. Hamm, P. C. and Speziale, A. J. 1956. Relation of herbicidal activity to the amide moiety of N-substituted alpha-chloroacetamides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 4:518–522.Google Scholar
5. Jaworski, E. G. 1956. Biochemical action of CDAA, a new herbicide. Science 123:847–848.Google Scholar
6. Nylund, R. E., Nelson, D. C., and Dinkel, D. H. 1958. Comparative costs of weeding onions by hand or with monuron, CIPC, and CDAA. Weeds 6:304–309.Google Scholar
7. Waldrep, T. W. and Freeman, J. F. 1964. EPTC injury to corn as affected by depth of incorporation in the soil. Weeds 12:315–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar