Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:16:10.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproductive Variation in Naturally Occurring Populations of the Weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kunjithapatham Dhileepan
Kunjithapatham Dhileepan*
Affiliation:
Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Biosecurity Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 46, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parthenium weed, an annual herb native to tropical America, causes severe economic, human, and animal health and environmental impacts in Australia and in many countries in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific. There is little known about variation in reproductive output in naturally occurring populations of this weed. This information is vital to develop plant population models, devise management strategies to reduce seed output, and formulate parthenium weed pollen-induced human health (e.g., dermatitis and hay fever) risk assessment. Here, the variations in the number of capitula produced by the parthenium weed at two sites in Queensland, Australia, over a 4-yr period are reported. Under field conditions, parthenium weed produced up to 39,192 capitula per plant (> 156,768 seeds per plant), with majority of the plants (≈ 75%) producing between 11 and 1,000 capitula, and less than 0.3% of the plants producing more than 10,000 capitula (> 40,000 seeds per plant). The number of capitula per plant in the field (297 ± 22) was much lower than those reported from glasshouse and laboratory studies. Plant biomass contributed to 50 to 80% of the variation in capitulum production between plants within plots at each site, and weed density accounted for 62 to 73% of the variation in capitulum production between plots within each site. As plant size is directly correlated with reproductive output, plant size distributions in parthenium weed can be used to estimate effective population size. Information on variation in reproductive output will be used to implement management strategies to reduce parthenium weed seed output, resulting in reduced soil seed bank and weed seed spread.

Keywords

Parthenium weed, Parthenium hysterophorus LParthenium weedcapitulareproductionflowerseedAustralia
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 571 - 576
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Angiras, N. N. and Saine, J. P. 1997. Distribution, menace and management of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in Himachal Pradesh. Pages 13–15 in Mahadevappa, M. and Patil, V. C., eds. First International Conference on Parthenium Management. Dharwad, India University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Annapurna, C. and Singh, J. S. 2003. Variation of Parthenium hysterophorus in response to soil quality: implications for invasiveness. Weed Res. 43:190–198.Google Scholar
Auld, B. A., Hosking, J., and McFadyen, R. E. 1982–1983. Analysis of the spread of tiger pear and parthenium weed in Australia. Australian Weeds. 2:56–60.Google Scholar
Baker, G. A. and O'Dowd, D. J. 1982. Effects of parent plant density on the production of achene types in the annual Hypochoeris glabra . J. Ecol. 70:201–215.Google Scholar
Chippendale, J. F. and Panetta, F. D. 1994. The cost of parthenium weed to the Queensland cattle industry. Plant Prot. Q. 9:73–76.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. 2003. Seasonal variation in the effectiveness of leaf-feeding beetle Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and stem-galling moth Epiblema strenuana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) as biocontrol agents on the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 93:393–401.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. 2007. Biological control of Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) in Australian rangeland translates to improved grass production. Weed Sci. 55:497–501.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K., Madigan, B., Vitelli, M., McFadyen, R. E., Webster, K., and Trevino, M. 1996. An initiative in the biological control of parthenium. Pages 309–312 in Shepherd, R. C. H., ed. Proceeding of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference. Melbourne, Australia Weed Science Society of Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. and McFadyen, R. E. 2001. Effects of gall damage by the introduced biocontrol agent Epiblema strenuana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae). J. Appl. Entomol. 125:1–8.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K., Setter, S., and McFadyen, R. E. 2000. Response of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) to defoliation by the introduced biocontrol agent Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biol. Control. 19:9–16.Google Scholar
Dhileepan, K. and Strathie, L. 2009. Parthenium hysterophorus . Pages 272–316 in Muniappan, R., Reddy, D.V.P., and Raman, A., eds. Weed Biological Control with Arthropods in the Tropics: Towards Sustainability. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Espeland, E. K. and O'Farrell, M. R. 2010. Small variance in growth rates in annual plants has large effects on genetic drift. Am. J. Bot. 97:1407–1411.Google Scholar
Espeland, E. K. and Rice, K. J. 2010. Ecological effects on estimates of effective population size in an annual plant. Biol. Cons. 143:946–951.Google Scholar
Fauzi, M. T. 2009. Biocontrol ability of Puccinia abrupta var. partheniicola on different growth stages of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). HYATI. J. Biosciences. 16:83–87.Google Scholar
Firehun, Y. and Tamado, T. 2006. Weed flora in the Rift Valley sugarcane plantations of Ethiopia as influenced by soil types and agronomic practises. Weed Biol. Manag. 6:139–150.Google Scholar
Haseler, W. H. 1976. Parthenium hysterophorus L. in Australia. PANS. 22:515–580.Google Scholar
Kandasamy, O. S. and Sankaran, S. 1997. Management of parthenium using competitive crops and plants. Pages 33–36 in Mahadevappa, M. and Patil, V. C., eds. First International Conference on Parthenium Management. Dharwad, India University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
McFadyen, R. E. 1992. Biological control against parthenium weed in Australia. Crop Prot. 24:400–407.Google Scholar
McFadyen, R. E. 1995. Parthenium weed and human health in Queensland. Aust. Fam. Physician. 24:1455–1459.Google Scholar
Navie, S. C., McFadyen, R. E., Panetta, F. D., and Adkins, S. W. 1996a. The biology of Australian weeds 27. Parthenium hysterophorus L. Plant Prot. Q. 11:76–88.Google Scholar
Navie, S. C., McFadyen, R. E., Panetta, F. D., and Adkins, S. W. 1996b. A comparison of the growth and phenology of two introduced biotypes of Parthenium hysterophorus . Pages 313–316 in Shepherd, R.C.H., ed. Proceeding of the Eleventh Australian Weeds Conference. Melbourne, Australia Weed Science Society of Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Navie, S. C., Panetta, F. D., McFadyen, R. E., and Adkins, S. W. 1998. Behaviour of buried and surface-lying seeds of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Weed Res. 38:338–341.Google Scholar
Pandey, D. K., Palani, L. M. S., and Joshi, S. C. 2003. Growth, reproduction and photosynthesis of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus). Weed Sci. 51:191–201.Google Scholar
Pandey, H. N. and Dubey, S. K. 1989. Growth and population dynamics of an exotic weed Parthenium hysterophorus Linn. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.) 99:51–58.Google Scholar
Rice, K. J. 1990. Reproductive hierarchies in Erodium: effects of variation in plant density and rainfall distribution. Ecology. 71:1316–1322.Google Scholar
Sarukhán, J., Martinez-Ramoz, M., and PinẼro, D. 1984. The analysis of demographic variability at the individual level and its population consequences. Pages 83–106 in Dirzo, R. and Sarukhan, J., eds. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology. Sunderland, MA Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Schmitt, J., Eccleston, J., and Ehrhardt, D. W. 1987. Density-dependent flowering phenology, outcrossing, and reproduction in Impatiens capensis . Oecologia. 72:341–347.Google Scholar
Sharma, V. K. and Sethuraman, G. 2007. Parthenium dermatitis. Dermatitis. 18:183–190.Google Scholar
Singh, K. and Kour, J. 1997. Parthenium menace in Jammu and Kashmir and its possible control measures. Pages 16–19 in Mahadevappa, M. and Patil, V. C., eds. First International Conference on Parthenium Management. Dharwad, India University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Sridhara, S., Basavaraja, B. K., and Ganeshaiah, K. N. 2005. Temporal variation in relative dominance of Parthenium hysterophorus and its effect on native biodiversity. Pages 240–242 in Ramachandra Prasad, T. V., Nanjappa, H. V., Devendra, R., Manjunath Subramanya, A., Chandrashekar, S. C., Kiran Kumar, V. K., Jayaram, K. A., and Prabhakara Setty, T. K., eds. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Parthenium Management. Bangalore, India University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Tamado, T. and Milberg, P. 2000. Weed flora in arable fields of eastern Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus . Weed Res. 40:507–521.Google Scholar
Tamado, T., Ohlander, L., and Milberg, P. 2002. Interference by the weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: influence of weed density and duration of competition. Int. J. Pest Manag. 48:183–188.Google Scholar
Tremblay, R. L. and Ackerman, J. D. 2001. Gene flow and effective population size in Lepanthes (Orchidaceae): a case for genetic drift. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72:47–62.Google Scholar
Tudor, G. D., Ford, A. L., Armstrong, T. R., and Bromage, E. K. 1982. Taints in meat from sheep grazing Parthenium hysterophorus . Aust. J. Exp. Agr. Anim. Husb. 22:43–46.Google Scholar
Williams, J. D. and Groves, R. H. 1980. The influence of temperature and photoperiod on growth and development of Parthenium hysterophorus L. Weed Res. 20:47–52.Google Scholar